SFC OP > Orion Pirates Patrol Battles Arena
Patrol Battle Rule Links
KHH Jakle:
I emailed that thing to you a month ago.
You just now want to chime in on your ruling?
And then you want to bump this as if I am not responding fast enough?
For the record, maybe Support is a better place for it - so long as it's restricted.
But I've got a piece of news for you TT:
v 4.0 is it, and the current Matrix versions are it.
Any further modifications will have to go through Kroma or DH, it's theirs now - should it actually need sheparding (if this gig's dead, what's the point)
TraumaTech:
--- Quote from: Jakle on June 10, 2005, 10:20:02 pm ---I emailed that thing to you a month ago.
You just now want to chime in on your ruling?
And then you want to bump this as if I am not responding fast enough?
For the record, maybe Support is a better place for it - so long as it's restricted.
But I've got a piece of news for you TT:
v 4.0 is it, and the current Matrix versions are it.
Any further modifications will have to go through Kroma or DH, it's theirs now - should it actually need sheparding (if this gig's dead, what's the point)
--- End quote ---
Jakle pull your head out of your - - - and smell the free air this all started when you erroneously placed the L-DND into a command varient class. I simply asked why you placed it there,when there was nothing showing in the ship description to explain why it was placed there.I SIMPLY ASKED???You for some reason(as usual) when i ask a question, answered it rudely or at least flippantly and stated it was command varient,because i described it as an "awsome ship",and all "awsome ships",get a designation of command varient.I accepted this but asked for your source material for your reasoning,simply to understand.U don't seem to have a problem answering other peoples concerns ,about why a certain ship gets placed in a particular category.Why do you have probs with my questions?
As for the "bump" that was not to speed you up ,but as you had posted a new thread after i had given a response,i figured you didn't get the indication showing when a new response had been posted to a thread,so i bumped it,PLAIN AND SIMPLE,not as "YOU" supposed to speed up your reply.SOOOOOO,grow up and get over whatever you feel it is,that i offended you in the past.Near as i can remember,both publicly and by private message i have tried to bury the hatchet with you,apparently....... to no avail.If PBR doesn't continue on in the future,that would be ashame,as it was a great idea you came up with,and those in the sfc community that like it or some form of ladder league will miss it.
KHH Jakle:
'Erroneously' in your opinion....which doesn't go too far with me.
It seems to me that the ulterior motive is to have the ship placed in support, where it can be used along side another command variant, thus bringing into play two strong ships, where currently you couldn't with the DND as a command variant.
However, in the end, it's all subjective. Hell, I can admit the possibility of me being wrong. It would seem PBR has been a 2 year exercise in that.
The bottom line is I am no longer maintaining PBR. I carried through to where it is, and now I am done with it. I gave you an oppurtunity to get a final resolution on this - you neglected to follow up on it till now. You missed the boat with me.
You can take it up with Kroma (who had offered to host PBR on his own website - at which point I'll take it off mine). If he opts to not pick it up, then it will remain up on mine indefinitely - but it will not be updated.
You may want to consider copying and pasting the ship description into a seperate thread and getting the rest of the PBR playing community's opinion - that's what I would have ended up doing.
Good Luck.
TraumaTech:
--- Quote from: Jakle on June 13, 2005, 07:55:46 am ---'Erroneously' in your opinion....which doesn't go too far with me.
i didn't base my last response on my opinion,but on the material you sent me,which i have started a new thread in which i typed out that same material verbatim.........
It seems to me that the ulterior motive is to have the ship placed in support, where it can be used along side another command variant, thus bringing into play two strong ships, where currently you couldn't with the DND as a command variant.
prior to finding out it had been placed in command varient,i had it placed as a unrestricted ship,because there was no description decribing it as a command varient or escort.As such i only wanted to know why this particular ship which didn't have an "L" or "E" as part of it designatiom was now a command varient.No ulterior motive at all;after having read your material,i agree that it should be restricted,as a support vessel,not command varient.Would i like to have it as an unrestricted ship.....YES,who wouldn't??I am only doing ,as one of FSD leaders what is best for the lyran fleet/race,and according to SFB source material,it was used as a support vessel
However, in the end, it's all subjective. Hell, I can admit the possibility of me being wrong. It would seem PBR has been a 2 year exercise in that.
PBR has been a two year exercise in learning ships and tactics.Any errors/mistakes i am fairly certain are more in your mind than in the SFC/OP community ..........job well done :notworthy:
--- End quote ---
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version