Dynaverse.net

Taldrenites => Dynaverse II Experiences => Topic started by: KAT J'inn on November 09, 2004, 05:20:42 pm

Title: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 09, 2004, 05:20:42 pm
SFC2Net 9.0:   The General War, Part IV

GAME PLAY THREAD


THE KLINGON EMPIRE

CAPITAL SHIPS


IKV Seawitch / Heavy Carrier (C8VK) / Skull-N-Bones, CO
IKV Admiral Kang / Dreadnought (C10K) / GreyWuf, CO
C10K to WarSears

IKV Plague / Heavy Battlecruiser (C7V) / Dib, CO
IKV Fear / Heavy Battlecruiser (C7V) / Trajen, CO
IKV Pain / Heavy Battlecruiser (C7V) / Kurok, CO
C7V to Krueg
C7V to Mazeppa

-K.I.A. 2280  IKV Pestilence / Heavy Battlecruiser (C7) : 2 VC
-K.I.A. 2282  IKV War / Heavy Battlecruiser (C7) : 2 VC
-K.I.A. 2282  IKV Fire / Heavy Battlecruiser (C7) : 2 VC
-K.I.A. 2282  IKV Death / Heavy Battlecruiser (C7V) : 2VC
-K.I.A. 2287  IKV Harbringer / Heavy Carrier (C8VK) : 4 VC
-K.I.A. 2287  IKV Vindicator / Heavy Carrier (C8VK) : 4 VC


SPECIAL MISSIONS SHIPS

IKV Ravager / New Drone Bombardment Cruiser (DWD) / KHH-MiniMe, CO
IKV Swift Slayer / New Fast Heavy Cruiser (FDW) / Shadowlord, CO
IKV Slinger / Drone Cruiser (D5D) / KBF-Nail, CO
IKV Trebuchet / Drone Cruiser (D5D) / Lear, CO
IKV Longbow / Drone Cruiser (D5D) / KDF-Duros, CO
 IKV Swift Reaver / New Fast Heavy Cruiser (FDW) / KBF-Frankk, CO
IKV Swift Berserker / New Fast Heavy Cruiser (FDW) / Boylinux, CO
 IKV Archer / Drone Cruiser (D5D) / Stardowner, CO
 IKV Swift Stalker / New Fast Heavy Cruiser (FDW) / WarSears, CO
IKV Unforgiving / Interdiction Carrier (D6U) / Crim, CO
Pardek get FDWF
KBF Lord Munro gets a FDW
KHH_Morgue gets a FDW



IN DOCK:

IKV Swift Axe / Fast Battlecruiser (FD7K)
IKV Swift Sword / Fast Battlecruiser (FD7K)
 IKV Swift Strike / New Fast Heavy Cruiser (FDW)
 IKV Swift Stealer / New Fast Heavy Cruiser (FDW)
IKV Thundersword / New Drone Bombardment Cruiser (DWD)
IKV Swift Killer / New Fast Heavy Cruiser (FDW)

-K.I.A. 2274  IKV Quill Beast / Drone Cruiser (D5D)
-K.I.A. 2276  IKV Swift Dagger / New Fast Heavy Cruiser (FDW)
-K.I.A. 2277  IKV Thunderlance / New Drone Bombardment Cruiser (DWD)
-K.I.A. 2281  IKV Catapult / Drone Cruiser (D5D)
-K.I.A. 2288  IKV Raider / Drone Cruiser (D5D)
-K.I.A. 2288  IKV Soulkiller / New Drone Bombardment Cruiser (DWD)
-K.I.A.  2288 IKV Thunderaxe / New Drone Bombardment Cruiser (DWD) ?-K.I.A. 2282  IKV Crossbow / Drone Cruiser (D5D)

Build Points

Intital Allotment = 6 BPs

First Round = 6 - 4 = 2 BP Balance
Second Round = 2 + 6 - 7 = 1 BP Balance
Third Round = 1 + 6 - 6 = 1 BP Balance
Fourth Round = 1 + 6 - 6 = 1 BP Balance
Fifth Round= 1 + 6 -6 = 1 BP Balance
Final Round = 1 + 6 ? 7 = 0

PvP VCs EARNED = 18


THE ROMULAN STAR EMPIRE

CAPITAL SHIPS

 RIS Senator / Praetor Heavy Dreadnought (PRA) / KBF-Nail


KillerHawk Super-Heavy Cruiser (KHK) / Reejr, CO
KHK to Ben

-K.I.A. 2277 RIS Imperial Standard / SuperHawk-B Heavy Carrier (SUB) : 2 VC
-K.I.A. 2277 RIS Shrike / Shrike Light Dreadnought (SHR) : 3 VC
-K.I.A. 2279 RIS Colossus / Condor-V Heavy Carrier (CNV) : 4 VC
-K.I.A. 2279 RIS Dictator / Condor-H Heavy Dreadnought (CNH) : 3 VC
-K.I.A. 2288 RIS Imperator / Praetor Heavy Dreadnought (PRA) : 3 VC
-K.I.A.  2287  KCRF : 2 VC
-K.I.A. 2287  KillerHawk Super-Heavy Cruiser (KHK) : 2 VC

SPECIAL MISSIONS SHIPS

RIS Rocky Horror / FlameHawk Heavy Cruiser (FHF) / Julin Eurthyr, CO
RIS Imperial Hawk / NovaHawk-F Command Cruiser (NHKF) / Raza
RIS Treachery / Kestral PF Tender (KDP) / Madelf, CO
 RIS Exchange / Kestral PF Tender (KDP) / Pardek, CO
RIS Green Hawk / Super Hawk Heavy Cruiser (SUK) / Sethan, CO
RIS Onager / Kestral PF Tender (KDP) / Firesoul, CO
 RIS Balista New Stike Carrier (KWV) / Likkerpig, CO
RIS Loyal Hawk / NovaHawk-F Command Cruiser (NHKF) / Farfarius, CO
ShadowLord KDP
Lear KDP
Pardek NHKF
NHKF to Reyam

IN DOCK:

RIS Star Hawk / Peregrine New Mauler (FHP)
RIS Deceit / Kestral PF Tender (KDP)
RIS Paulus / FastHawk-K Heavy Cruiser (FFHK)
RIS Imperial Hawk II / NovaHawk-F Command Cruiser (NHKF)

-K.I.A. 2275 RIS Andinius / FastHawk-K Heavy Cruiser (FFHK)
-K.I.A. 2277 RIS Eternal Guardian / Sparrowhawk-M Escort Cruiser (SPM)
-K.I.A. 2280 RIS Praetor Tacitus / SuperHawk-K Command Cruiser (SUK)
-K.I.A. 2280 RIS Praetorian / Kestral PF Tender (KDP)
-K.I.A. 2288 RIS Avion / Kestral-F  Command Cruiser (KRCSF)
-K.I.A.  2288 RIS Retaliation / Kestral PF Tender (KDP)

Build Points

Intital Allotment = 4 BPs

First Round = 4 - 3 = 1 BP Balance
Second Round = 1 + 4 - 4 = 1 BP Balance
Third Round = 1 + 4 - 3 = 2 BP Balance
Fourth Round = 2 + 4 - 6 = 0 BP Balance
Fifth Round = 0 + 4 - 4 = 0 BP Balance
Final Round = 0 + 4 ? 4 = 0

PvP VCs EARNED = 10


THE UNITED FEDERATION OF PLANETS

CAPITAL SHIPS

U.S.S. Napoleon / Heavy Carrier (CVA+) / 762, CO
 U.S.S. Entente / Heavy Dreadnought (DNH) /  FPF-TraceyG, CO
U.S.S. Trusteeship / Heavy Dreadnaught (DNH) / FPF-Diehard, CO
U.S.S. Unification / Heavy Dreadnought (DNH) / Myraid, CO

U.S.S. Ogarkov / Heavy Battle Cruiser (BCFF) / Thrain, CO
U.S.S. Kirov / Heavy Battle Cruiser (BCFF) / Nemo, CO
U.S.S. Cushing / Heavy Battle Cruiser (BCFF) / FPF-Jem, CO
U.S.S. Mitchell / Heavy Battle Cruiser (BCFF) / F9th-Icehawk, CO
1. F-DNH (FPF-DrAzteca)
2. F-BCV (F14s) (Hexx)
3. F-BCV (F14s) (KOTH-Green)
4. F-BCV (F14s) (Mistress_Kroma)
5. F-BCV (F14s) (Mounty)

-K.I.A.  2274  U.S.S. Star Tiger / Light Dreadnaught Carrier (DVL) : 3 VC
-K.I.A.  2278  U.S.S. Bismark / Heavy Battle Cruiser (BCF) : 2 VC
-K.I.A.  2280  U.S.S. Forrest / Heavy Battle Cruiser (BCF) : 2 VC
-K.I.A.  2280  U.S.S. Wallace / Heavy Battle Cruiser (BCFF) : 2 VC
-K.I.A.  2283  U.S.S. Canadia / Heavy Battle Cruiser (BCFF) : 2 VC
-K.I.A.  2288  U.S.S. MacArthur / Heavy Carrier (CVA+) : 4 VC
-K.I.A.  2288  U.S.S. Bolshoi / Heavy Battle Cruiser (BCFF) : 2 VC
-K.I.A.  2288 U.S.S. Alliance / Heavy Dreadnought (DNH) : 3 VC
-K.I.A.  2288 U.S.S. Solidarity / Heavy Dreadnought (DNH)  : 3 VC
-K.I.A.  2288 U.S.S. Star Leopard / Light Dreadnaught Carrier (DVL) : 3 VC
-K.I.A.  2288 U.S.S. Shangri-La / Heavy Battle Carrier (BCV : 2 VC


IN DOCK:

N/A

SPECIAL MISSIONS SHIPS

 U.S.S. Kadesh / Heavy Command Cruiser (CBF) /  FPF-BobG
 U.S.S. Gravelotte / Heavy Command Cruiser (CBF) /  SSCF-Leroy
U.S.S. Tannenburg / Heavy Command Cruiser (CBF) /  BlueByda
U.S.S. Toulouse / Heavy Drone Cruiser (CAD+R) /  DaveyE
U.S.S. Agincourt / Heavy Drone Cruiser (CAD+R) / FPF-AJTK, CO
U.S.S. Orleans / Heavy Drone Cruiser (CAD+R) / KOTH-Soreyes, CO
U.S.S. Avignon / Heavy Drone Cruiser (CAD+R) / F9th-Ryker, CO
U.S.S. Marseille / Heavy Drone Cruiser (CAD+R) / Davey-E, CO
U.S.S. Brazos / Interdiction Carrier (CVD) / EFF-Age, CO
U.S.S. Lagavulin / New Strike Carrier (NCV) / FPF-Bach
U.S.S. Vienne / New Escort Cruiser (NEC) / Surfal, CO
U.S.S. Galahad / New Heavy PF Tender (NHP) / FPF-Wanderer, CO
U.S.S. Dayton / New Heavy PF Tender (NHP) / Bearslayer, CO
U.S.S. Belleraphon / New Heavy PF Tender (NHP) /  Bos'n
U.S.S. Tacitus / New Light Command Cruiser (CLCF) /  Pookie, CO
U.S.S. Hermes / New Strike Carrier (NCV) / Green, CO
1. F-CBF (1AF Capt Jeff)
2. F-CAD+R (KAT-Lyrkiller)
4. F-CLCF (Mantis)
5. F-CAD+R (FPF-TobinDax)
7. F-CBF (FPF-Thrain)
8. F-CBF (SPACEDOCK)
9. F-CAD+R (ConfusedKitty)



IN DOCK:

U.S.S. Wolverine / Fast Cruiser (CFR)
U.S.S. Mahan / New Light Command Cruiser (CLCF)
 U.S.S. Alesia / Heavy Command Cruiser (CBF)
U.S.S. Cannae / Heavy Command Cruiser (CBF)


-K.I.A. 2273  U.S.S. Gromykii / Improved New Drone Cruiser (NCD+)
-K.I.A. 2274  U.S.S. Eagle / Fast Cruiser (CF)
-K.I.A. 2274  U.S.S. Nile / Interdiction Carrier (CVD)
-K.I.A. 2274  U.S.S. Groznyy / Improved New Drone Cruiser (NCD+)
-K.I.A. 2274  U.S.S. Mustang Sally / Fast Cruiser (CF)
-K.I.A. 2277  U.S.S. Stingray / Fast Cruiser (CF)
-K.I.A. 2277  U.S.S. Vikrant / New Strike Carrier (NCV)
-K.I.A. 2277  U.S.S. Billy Bong / New Strike Carrier (NCV)
-K.I.A. 2277  U.S.S. Poitiers / Heavy Drone Cruiser (CAD+)
-K.I.A. 2279  U.S.S. Clemenceau / New Strike Carrier (NCV)
-K.I.A. 2279  U.S.S. Cheshire / New Fast Cruiser (NCF)
-K.I.A. 2280  U.S.S. Beavis / New Fast Cruiser (NCF)
-K.I.A. 2280  U.S.S. Laffey / New Escort Cruiser (NEC)
-K.I.A. 2280  U.S.S. Clancy / New Light Command Cruiser (CLCF)
-K.I.A. 2280  U.S.S. Chicago / New Heavy PF Tender (NHP)
-K.I.A. 2280  U.S.S. Sverdlov / Improved New Drone Cruiser (NCD+)
-K.I.A. 2280  U.S.S. Garibaldi / New Strike Carrier (NCV)
-K.I.A. 2280  U.S.S. Manchester / New Fast Cruiser (NCFF)
-K.I.A. 2281  U.S.S. Jackson / Strike Carrier (CVSR)
-K.I.A. 2281  U.S.S. Manta Ray / New Fast Cruiser (NCF)
-K.I.A. 2281  U.S.S. Rickenbacker / New Strike Carrier (NCV)
-K.I.A. 2281  U.S.S. Calais / Heavy Drone Cruiser (CAD+R)
-K.I.A. 2285  U.S.S. Fitzwallace / New Escort Cruiser (NEC)
-K.I.A. 2288  U.S.S. Gettysburg / Heavy Command Cruiser (CBF)
-K.I.A. 2288  U.S.S. Devil Ray / New Fast Cruiser (NCF+PF)
-K.I.A. 2288  F-NCDR
-K.I.A. 2288  F-CBF


Build Points

Intital Allotment = 10 BPs

First Round = 10 - 10 = 0 BP Balance
Second Round = 0 + 10 - 10 = 0 BP Balance
Third Round = 0 + 10 - 9 = 1 BP Balance
Fourth Round = 1 + 10 - 11 = 0 BP Balance
Fifth Round = 1 + 10 - 9 = 2 BP Balance
Final Round = 2 + 10 ? 11 = 1 BP

PvP VCs Earned = 35



GRAND TOTALS

Alliance =  35 PvP VCs  +  4 Map VCs (2 border stations held by the Tholians) = 39 VCs

Coalition = 28 PvP VCs  + 8 Map VCs (4 Federation Border Stations Taken) = 36 VCs
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 10, 2004, 12:51:17 pm
Dear Admins:

I need a good bumping.  Followed by a good nailing . . .   of this thread to the top of the forum.

Thank you.

J'inn


P.S.   I'd like dinner, a show, and a kiss also.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Bob Graham on November 10, 2004, 01:08:33 pm
Dear Admins:

I need a good humping.  Followed by a good nailing . . .   
Thank you.

J'inn


P.S.   I'd like dinner, a show, and a kiss also.


Surely I'm reading this wrong...  ::)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC on November 10, 2004, 01:25:30 pm
Consider yourself nailed... to a cross <snicker>

Thread stickied.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 10, 2004, 01:28:26 pm
Consider yourself nailed


Oooooooooo  BABY!!!!!

Thank you Tracey.



Gentlemen & Tracey . . .  Start your ship assigning.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 10, 2004, 02:42:49 pm
Fed 2273 Builds are done, you want a post, a PM, or can your Flea-bag ass simply look in the Alliance Forum? 
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 10, 2004, 02:54:56 pm
or can your Flea-bag ass simply look in the Alliance Forum? 


Slave driver.


Okay.  Alliance builds are posted.   Two need clarification.   What exact ship type are Paladin and Leroy getting?
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Wanderer on November 10, 2004, 08:14:00 pm
Hey, J'inn...just for historical accuracy...Well, ok, almost...I had to leave Mustang Sally for Kroma, heheh...

U.S.S. MacArthur  (Sector Command Platform),  Heavy Carrier Class (CVA+), Admiral Die Hard, CO
U.S.S. Star Tiger, Light Dreadnaught Class (DNL/DVL : F14s), Commodore LeRoy, CO
U.S.S. Star Leopard, Light Dreadnaught Class (DNL/DVL : F14s), Commodore Paladin, CO

U.S.S. Nimitz, Strike Carrier Class (CVS+), Captain Green, CO
U.S.S. Nile, Interdiction Carrier Class (CVD), Captain DeadmanSix, CO
U.S.S. Brazos, Interdiction Carrier Class (CVD), Captain Phi Templar, CO
U.S.S. Wolverine, Fast Cruiser Class (CF), Captain Jem, CO
U.S.S. Stingray, Fast Cruiser Class (CF), Captain Dr. Azteca, CO
U.S.S. Eagle, Fast Cruiser Class (CF), Captain Wraith, CO
U.S.S. Mustang Sally, Fast Cruiser Class (CF), Mistress Kroma, CO
U.S.S. Groznyy, Improved New Drone Cruiser Class (NCD+), Captain Tobin Dax, CO
U.S.S. Gromykii, Improved New Drone Cruiser Class (NCD+), Captain Komodo, CO
U.S.S. Agincourt, Heavy Drone Cruiser Class (CAD), Captain Kirk (AJTK), CO

<snicker>  :P
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 10, 2004, 08:27:32 pm
Hey, J'inn...just for historical accuracy...Well, ok, almost...I had to leave Mustang Sally for Kroma, heheh...

U.S.S. MacArthur  (Sector Command Platform),  Heavy Carrier Class (CVA+), Admiral Die Hard, CO
U.S.S. Star Tiger, Light Dreadnaught Class (DNL/DVL : F14s), Commodore LeRoy, CO
U.S.S. Star Leopard, Light Dreadnaught Class (DNL/DVL : F14s), Commodore Paladin, CO

U.S.S. Nimitz, Strike Carrier Class (CVS+), Captain Green, CO
U.S.S. Nile, Interdiction Carrier Class (CVD), Captain DeadmanSix, CO
U.S.S. Brazos, Interdiction Carrier Class (CVD), Captain Phi Templar, CO
U.S.S. Wolverine, Fast Cruiser Class (CF), Captain Jem, CO
U.S.S. Stingray, Fast Cruiser Class (CF), Captain Dr. Azteca, CO
U.S.S. Eagle, Fast Cruiser Class (CF), Captain Wraith, CO
U.S.S. Mustang Sally, Fast Cruiser Class (CF), Mistress Kroma, CO
U.S.S. Groznyy, Improved New Drone Cruiser Class (NCD+), Captain Tobin Dax, CO
U.S.S. Gromykii, Improved New Drone Cruiser Class (NCD+), Captain Komodo, CO
U.S.S. Agincourt, Heavy Drone Cruiser Class (CAD), Captain Kirk (AJTK), CO

<snicker>  :P


Thanks
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 10, 2004, 09:00:06 pm
So Kroma's official Federeation rank is "Mistress?"  :o
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 11, 2004, 09:06:57 am
So Kroma's official Federeation rank is "Mistress?"  :o

I would prefer Dominatrix.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-AJTK on November 11, 2004, 09:31:57 am
How bout just "skank bitch" ?

<snicker>
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 11, 2004, 09:37:22 am
How bout just "skank bitch" ?

<snicker>


Hey DH, need a bit of Fed tactical advice. Which ship has the most transports and T-bomb storage capacity?

Kroma

PS, AJTK, will fly your wing any day. <snicker>
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 11, 2004, 10:20:21 am


Hey DH, need a bit of Fed tactical advice. Which ship has the most transports and T-bomb storage capacity?


F-DN+, but we ain't building one of those POSs
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-AJTK on November 11, 2004, 04:50:35 pm
Oh, you KNOW I love it when you play rough, Kroma.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Bach on November 11, 2004, 05:25:54 pm
How bout just "skank bitch" ?

<snicker>


Hey DH, need a bit of Fed tactical advice. Which ship has the most transports and T-bomb storage capacity?

Kroma

PS, AJTK, will fly your wing any day. <snicker>

GSC+  has 7 transporters.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 12, 2004, 09:52:04 pm
Klingon Builds:
1 C8V piloted by Kytarh 4 BP 2 BP banked

Specialty ships:
D5D to WarSears
D5D to Dib
D5D to Ktaqh jeH
D5D to Trajen
FD7K to Skull
FD7K to DoomStone

Romulan builds:
1 SHR piloted by Reejr 3 BP 1 BP banked
The SUB will be piloted by FierSoul

Specialty ships:
FFHK to Mog
FFHK to Soth
FFHK to Pardek
SUK to Emerald Edge

Monday is the next round more to come to those that missed out this time... ;)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 12, 2004, 10:13:16 pm
Wanna name em for me Wanderer?
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 12, 2004, 10:23:08 pm
Skull's is IKV Sea Witch
Ktaqh jeH is Quill Beast

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 12, 2004, 10:28:20 pm
WarSears    Chuckies Revenge
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Strafer on November 12, 2004, 10:32:12 pm
I would prefer Dominatrix.
Silly lizard, there are no Andros here.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 12, 2004, 10:51:13 pm

Specialty ships:
FFHK to Mog
FFHK to Soth
FFHK to Pardek
NHKF to Emerald Edge

Monday is the next round more to come to those that missed out this time... ;)



NHKF not out this cycle, try again in 10 years.  ;D  Pick something else as you cannot bank CPs

EIDT:  My fault, the shiplist has it out WAY too early.  I forget tha change the FYA when I added the Mech Links.   

Stick of few pins in the DH Voodoo doll that I know you have.   

PPS: THe casual Tenders are supposed to come out in 2280.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 12, 2004, 11:07:10 pm
Klingon Builds:
1 C8V piloted by Kytarh 4 BP 2 BP banked

I believe you can only bank 1 of those BPs, thus forfieting 1 if you so choose to build a C8V over 2 C5Ks, as the rules state:

Quote
Each race must build at least one 3 or 4 BP ship each round.

A minimum of 75% of all BP (if possible) must be spent in each round (rounding up) the balance may be banked. CPs may not be banked.


Since it is possible to spend a minimum of 75%.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 12, 2004, 11:37:54 pm

Specialty ships:
FFHK to Mog
FFHK to Soth
FFHK to Pardek
NHKF to Emerald Edge

Monday is the next round more to come to those that missed out this time... ;)


Hm, well, we were going by the shiplist listing of 2274


NHKF not out this cycle, try again in 10 years.  ;D  Pick something else as you cannot bank CPs

EIDT:  My fault, the shiplist has it out WAY too early.  I forget tha change the FYA when I added the Mech Links.   

Stick of few pins in the DH Voodoo doll that I know you have.   

PPS: THe casual Tenders are supposed to come out in 2280.
We were going by the listed year of 2274
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 12, 2004, 11:45:37 pm

Hm, well, we were going by the shiplist listing of 2274


You'll probably want to pick something else though as it is set to 2280 on the server side, so it won't be showing up in the shipyard anytime soon.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 12, 2004, 11:54:27 pm
Klingon Builds:
1 C8V piloted by Kytarh 4 BP 2 BP banked

I believe you can only bank 1 of those BPs, thus forfieting 1 if you so choose to build a C8V over 2 C5Ks, as the rules state:

Quote
Each race must build at least one 3 or 4 BP ship each round.

A minimum of 75% of all BP (if possible) must be spent in each round (rounding up) the balance may be banked. CPs may not be banked.


Since it is possible to spend a minimum of 75%.

So we can't build what we want unless we FORFIET BPs?\
4 BPs spent out of 6 is 2/3 and that's not close enough?
Now I see why the minimum build was raised from 50% to 75%
There's no way to for the Klingons to build a carrier unless we forfiet BPs, while the Feds can, since they have 10 BPs vs our 6, very clever.
Unless, of course, we take some planets, of course they have to be Fed planets because the Tholians can't be attacked, like the LDR in GW2.
But, that won't work on the first round, will it?
That's F@$%*&% B*%%@#%+!
Fine Whatever, we don't want 2 C5Ks, we want a C8V
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FireSoul on November 13, 2004, 12:06:26 am
Don't sweat it Krueg.. It'll be fine.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: EmeraldEdge on November 13, 2004, 12:10:48 am
Well, if I can't have the NHKF, I guess I'll take an SUK, that's still 2274 isn't it?
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 13, 2004, 12:28:07 am
Well, if I can't have the NHKF, I guess I'll take an SUK, that's still 2274 isn't it?

Yeah, the SUK is out (I love that ship to, good choice  :thumbsup: ).

Again, sorry for the screw up, I goofed when cutting and pasting. 
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Julin Eurthyr on November 13, 2004, 12:42:41 am
Don't sweat it Krueg.. It'll be fine.

It shouldn't be "fine".  It should be fair...

We've been effectively told that, unless the Klinks want to lose a build point, we have to build 2x3 BP ships, as building 1 4xBP ship is only 66.67% spent, and therefore not legal under the new build mandates.

Doesn't matter that they're posting 3 DN-carriers while the entire coalition is Mathematically / YIS service datedly prohibited from building even 1 before Monday?  What happened to the carriers that SFB OOBs say we should have available here?  Could I have an explanation please?

In this very post, the Federation has actually overspent their initial allotment of CPs.  If you count, they have 10 "specialty ships", and the fact that their DNL pilots are announced as being able to fly DVLs, there is 12 CPs spent in that post.

Fine and fair indeed.  When they said the Alliance would be "favored" in the second half, as they "historically" were, I expected the favoring to be done via VCs etc. instead of the use of New Math...  :screwloose:
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 13, 2004, 01:03:04 am
So we can't build what we want unless we FORFIET BPs?\
4 BPs spent out of 6 is 2/3 and that's not close enough?

Is this the only rule you would like to use the "close enough" yard stick for?

Quote
Now I see why the minimum build was raised from 50% to 75%
There's no way to for the Klingons to build a carrier unless we forfiet BPs, while the Feds can, since they have 10 BPs vs our 6, very clever.

Resisting the urge to tell you where to go, as it sure sounds like you just accused us of cheating again.

No one ever even considered particular ship options, least of all you. You had weeks to consider the rule and implications. Yet you never brought up this concern. The rule was changed simply because it was felt 50% felt like to much, and not as some conspiracy to screw the Klingons. I didn't even know when the C8V came out, nor did Jinn I imagine and this was a rule he wrote. But sure it was all a big conspiracy.

Quote
Unless, of course, we take some planets,

Or use the banked point next round.

Quote
of course they have to be Fed planets because the Tholians can't be attacked, like the LDR in GW2.

Only the Tholian homeworld can't be attacked and you know that. It was explained to you that this was to make sure they could at least survive minimully throughout the server given all their other limitations.

What the F does GW2 LDR have to do with it anyway? Each server has had different conditions to favor one side or the other inorder to add historical flavor and overall campaign balance. So in your mind does the Allaince have to maintain every disadvantage they once had placed on them? Christ the Tholians aren't even allowed more than 5 players on at a time, how the hell could they defend their homeworld if you choose to take it. Do you have to have every advantage even though you are already up by 220 pts?

Quote
But, that won't work on the first round, will it?
That's F@$%*&% B*%%@#%+!
Fine Whatever, we don't want 2 C5Ks, we want a C8V

Whatever. You were supposed to be an admin too, and could have figured this out ahead of time and before accusing us of cheating, if you weren't to lazy to bother.

Helll you could have PM'ed us to discuss too, instead of the public accusation. Instead it the same ol crap about how it is all a big plan to screw the Klingons. Christ if we really wanted to screw the Klingons or Coalition for that matter would DH have bumped up your FYAs, added AMD to the C10, and given the Roms a free SUB? What the F is with you anyway Krueg? Christ every single comment you ever made pre-server as an admin was with the obvious intention of improving the Klingon side, not one single consideration outside seeking an advantage for your team. I never saw DH or Jinn do that for the coaliton. Quiet the opposite in fact.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 13, 2004, 01:21:09 am

It shouldn't be "fine".  It should be fair...


So we should take back the advantages and free ship you were given, or is "fair" a one way street where you are from.

Quote
We've been effectively told that, unless the Klinks want to lose a build point, we have to build 2x3 BP ships, as building 1 4xBP ship is only 66.67% spent, and therefore not legal under the new build mandates.

The rules and shiplist have been there to test and play with for a week, and once again the no shows start bitch a day late and a dollar short.

Quote
Doesn't matter that they're posting 3 DN-carriers while the entire coalition is Mathematically / YIS service datedly prohibited from building even 1 before Monday?  What happened to the carriers that SFB OOBs say we should have available here?  Could I have an explanation please?

If their are shiplist omissions or errors why haven't you posted about them during testing? Could I have an explaination please?

Quote
In this very post, the Federation has actually overspent their initial allotment of CPs.  If you count, they have 10 "specialty ships", and the fact that their DNL pilots are announced as being able to fly DVLs, there is 12 CPs spent in that post.

Your math is either off or you still haven't bothered to read the rules. A DVL (as well as any DN upgrade) is free if the upgrade was available when ship is initially built. the DVL was available in 2273.


Note on upgrades, there is no upgrade cost if the upgraded version of the ship is available when ship is initially being built. Thus a CP is only charged if you are upgrading and existing/surviving DN/BCH to a newer refit/version.


These rules haven't been changed in a week.

Quote
Fine and fair indeed.  When they said the Alliance would be "favored" in the second half, as they "historically" were, I expected the favoring to be done via VCs etc. instead of the use of New Math...  :screwloose:

The coalition got all the extras, as I have listed above, but once again it is the same ol whiners. So you have one unintended "possible" (yes possible as you can still use all your points legally) disadvantage, and everything is considered balanced in the favor of the Alliance. Hell they don't even have an unrestricted allied race. You got a FREE OOB ship for Christ sake. What a bunch of frigin babies.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 13, 2004, 01:21:23 am
Okay . . . traded notes with DH.

The 75% rule had unintended consequences.  I think the fairest way to do it is to say that 75% must be used each round (rounded down in the case of fractions)

Thus 4 out of 6 hits the mark and the remaining two can be banked

Feds would have to spend 7 out of 10

Roms 3 out of 4

Seems better that way.

Kroma please make the change.


Oh and Krueg . . .  what will it take to get you to send me a note with your concerns instead of flaming away here and getting everyone all riled up?    Cash?  Women?   Subscription to PlayKlink Magazine?  Name it.  <sigh>



P.S.   NOW LOOK WHAT YOU BONEHEADS HAVE DONE!!!  KROMA HAS HER PANTIES IN A BUNCH!!  LORD HELP US ALL.




Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 13, 2004, 01:27:10 am


Oh and Krueg . . .  what will it take to get you to send me a note with your concerns instead of flaming away here and getting everyone all riled up?    Cash?  Women?   Subscription to PlayKlink Magazine?  Name it.  <sigh>



Nothing, Krueg is being a tool. Plain and simple. To lazy to bother fullfilling his responsibility as an admin and to ready to start pointing fingers publically instead of trying to work it out. Hell I wouldn't have minded If he posted his concern publically, but is caling us cheaters really necessary?

PS, I'll make the change you requested. Wouldn't want it to be to balanced against the Klingons.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Julin Eurthyr on November 13, 2004, 07:59:16 am
Doesn't matter that they're posting 3 DN-carriers while the entire coalition is Mathematically / YIS service datedly prohibited from building even 1 before Monday?  What happened to the carriers that SFB OOBs say we should have available here?  Could I have an explanation please?
If their are shiplist omissions or errors why haven't you posted about them during testing? Could I have an explaination please?

"Mathematical elimination": To reach 5 (the minimum 75% spend) in 2273 requires the puruchase of a 3 BP and 2 BP ship.  Not a single (for anyone) 2 BP ship is out till Monday.  To reach 6 requires the purchase of 2x3 BP or a 4 and 2 BP ship.  Obviously we can't buy a 2 BP ship till Monday... :(
"YIS elimination": No "direct build from BP" carriers are available to the Klingons for 3 BP in 2273.  This is a SFB-design, and cannot be argued.  There is no omission here.

So, due to ADB and mathematical reasons, we were prohibited from building a carrier.  J'inn's ruling has cleared this point up.  I'm just explaining what I was saying... ;)

Quote
In this very post, the Federation has actually overspent their initial allotment of CPs.  If you count, they have 10 "specialty ships", and the fact that their DNL pilots are announced as being able to fly DVLs, there is 12 CPs spent in that post.
Quote
Your math is either off or you still haven't bothered to read the rules. A DVL (as well as any DN upgrade) is free if the upgrade was available when ship is initially built. the DVL was available in 2273.

Okay.  DVL is out on start date.  Blame me for not knowing all shiplists by heart.  Why did you list the pilots as ever touching DNLs?  I though the whole OOB threads were intended to avoid confusion???  ;)

Quote
Fine and fair indeed.  When they said the Alliance would be "favored" in the second half, as they "historically" were, I expected the favoring to be done via VCs etc. instead of the use of New Math...  :screwloose:

The coalition got all the extras, as I have listed above, but once again it is the same ol whiners. So you have one unintended "possible" (yes possible as you can still use all your points legally) disadvantage, and everything is considered balanced in the favor of the Alliance. Hell they don't even have an unrestricted allied race. You got a FREE OOB ship for Christ sake. What a bunch of frigin babies.
Quote
I haven't been whining all series.  Also, do I need to remind you how I played GW3?  Did you read the ending of my post?  I expect things to start getting rough for the Coalition in this half.  It is a given that carriers, with nifty SFB-fighters, and those especially-nifty F-14s are designed to whip the daylights out of anything outside the B-10 (which is still mired in Kzinti space... :() that doesn't have "5 magic G-racks".  And our "by the rules" counter is to leave the entire Carrier force in Kzinti space in favor of a pair of "Light" Dreadnoughts?  Sorry if I'm still stuck in a "strategic" thinking mode, and that my strategic thinking isn't limited to the "RTS" mold of outnumber / outtech the enemy...
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 13, 2004, 09:43:48 am

"Mathematical elimination": To reach 5 (the minimum 75% spend) in 2273 requires the puruchase of a 3 BP and 2 BP ship.  Not a single (for anyone) 2 BP ship is out till Monday.  To reach 6 requires the purchase of 2x3 BP or a 4 and 2 BP ship.  Obviously we can't buy a 2 BP ship till Monday... :(
"YIS elimination": No "direct build from BP" carriers are available to the Klingons for 3 BP in 2273.  This is a SFB-design, and cannot be argued.  There is no omission here.

So, due to ADB and mathematical reasons, we were prohibited from building a carrier.  J'inn's ruling has cleared this point up.  I'm just explaining what I was saying... ;)

Yeah to reach 6 required you to build to ships appropriate for the year, so sh*t. But your explaination still falls short of explaining the implied delibrate nerfing of your shiplist. I asked to to explain why you didn't bring up the issue earlier, and why you are arguing at all if you admit it is an SFB-design issue and not something we did delibrately.

Quote
Okay.  DVL is out on start date.  Blame me for not knowing all shiplists by heart.  Why did you list the pilots as ever touching DNLs?  I though the whole OOB threads were intended to avoid confusion???  ;)

No Julin, I blame you for shooting your mouth off implying one side is playing loose with the rules while forcing the other to adhere to them, and before even taking the time to get your facts straight. Because that is what you did. I imagine DH listed it that way for clarification that the DVL is built on the DNL hull. But no your right it is probably our fault that you are confused, since we should have known you guys would be to lazy to read the rules and test stuff out before the server and then bitch. I believe this makes 4 in a row, we should have known better.

Quote

I haven't been whining all series.  Also, do I need to remind you how I played GW3?  Did you read the ending of my post?  I expect things to start getting rough for the Coalition in this half.

I don't care about you equivacations. You expect it to get rough, but you bitch about it when it happens. The Coalition is the side getting the positive balance bumps on all fronts again yet you still whine the loudest. You guys should be ashamed of yourselves. Apparently winning is all that matters to you.

Quote
It is a given that carriers, with nifty SFB-fighters, and those especially-nifty F-14s are designed to whip the daylights out of anything outside the B-10 (which is still mired in Kzinti space... :() that doesn't have "5 magic G-racks".  And our "by the rules" counter is to leave the entire Carrier force in Kzinti space in favor of a pair of "Light" Dreadnoughts?  Sorry if I'm still stuck in a "strategic" thinking mode, and that my strategic thinking isn't limited to the "RTS" mold of outnumber / outtech the enemy...

There are no givens, and Rom plasma D fighters can wipe the floor with ANY fed fighter. Funny how you weren't bitching about how unfair it was for the Allaince when they had no counter to the B10, instead you imply here how unfair it is that you no longer have it, then go on to bitch about "magic G-racks" whaaaaaa.

Jeez, how much do you have to win by, your side has still been given all the non-SFB bumps in extra ships and shiplist tweaks, yet you still accuse us of making it un-fair for your side. I can't beleive what a bunch of whinning little brats you guys are.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 13, 2004, 10:01:29 am


Oh and Krueg . . .  what will it take to get you to send me a note with your concerns instead of flaming away here and getting everyone all riled up?    Cash?  Women?   Subscription to PlayKlink Magazine?  Name it.  <sigh>



Nothing, Krueg is being a tool. Plain and simple. To lazy to bother fullfilling his responsibility as an admin and to ready to start pointing fingers publically instead of trying to work it out. Hell I wouldn't have minded If he posted his concern publically, but is caling us cheaters really necessary?

PS, I'll make the change you requested. Wouldn't want it to be to balanced against the Klingons.

Hm, as an Admin, should I have been notified of planned meetings to discuss these and other rule and set-up issues when they were being decided, rather than simply reading in the forums or emails that "rules updated per our conversation last".
Yeah, I blew up last night when I read that...if I got someone panties tied in a knot, I apologize. And I never called anyone a "cheater". If I really thought that was going on, I would not hesitate to do so.
As far as sending a PM or email to you guys for an answer, quite frankly, I doubt I would have recieved an answer before the server started. Took a week to get an answer about the B-10 after asking twice.
I'm not even going to get into a Pi****g contest over this. It will stand where it is, I will not even spend the 1 BP forfieted. 
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Julin Eurthyr on November 13, 2004, 10:19:13 am
Perhaps you forgot my appointment as SAC under Bach in GW3.  That explains why I wasn't complaining about the K-B10, I was attempting to devise legitimate strategies to properly kill it, with the players / builds provided by my RM...

Colorblindness made me fly Alliance for 1 GW server.  I flew it with all the gusto, skill and planning I throw into every server I get that involved in, and can actually fly.  I fought Fed under the restrictions presented, as they were "proper" for the server simulation.

Before I explain myself any further, I'll say this.  Next time an Alliance officer "suggests" a build schedule for a Coalition race, especially if that officer has ties to Administration / Alliance High Command, and that build is obviously disadvantageous, (IIRC, C5s are "light" dreads, being squared off against 3 carriers) perhaps one should expect the perception of rule fixing, even in the case of an 100% honest mistake.   As this situation is cleared (we're allowed to build the carrier), I would rather not debate it anymore.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 13, 2004, 10:20:26 am


Oh and Krueg . . .  what will it take to get you to send me a note with your concerns instead of flaming away here and getting everyone all riled up?    Cash?  Women?   Subscription to PlayKlink Magazine?  Name it.  <sigh>



Nothing, Krueg is being a tool. Plain and simple. To lazy to bother fullfilling his responsibility as an admin and to ready to start pointing fingers publically instead of trying to work it out. Hell I wouldn't have minded If he posted his concern publically, but is caling us cheaters really necessary?

PS, I'll make the change you requested. Wouldn't want it to be to balanced against the Klingons.

Hm, as an Admin, should I have been notified of planned meetings to discuss these and other rule and set-up issues when they were being decided, rather than simply reading in the forums or emails that "rules updated per our conversation last".
Yeah, I blew up last night when I read that...if I got someone panties tied in a knot, I apologize. And I never called anyone a "cheater". If I really thought that was going on, I would not hesitate to do so.
As far as sending a PM or email to you guys for an answer, quite frankly, I doubt I would have recieved an answer before the server started. Took a week to get an answer about the B-10 after asking twice.
I'm not even going to get into a Pi****g contest over this. It will stand where it is, I will not even spend the 1 BP forfieted. 


I think you missed my post.   I changed the rule.   It was unfair to the Klingons as it was worded.     As for the meetings.   I wrote all of the rules except for certain parts such as the Romulan ships and the build cycles as I didn't have enough info on that.   So the meetings were basically on those issues AFAIR.

I didn't put tons opf thought into it as I just really don't have the time to do so.   I figure there are logic mistakes.  I also figure you guys will catch them.

The rule needed to be changed as 75% of 6 just plain screws the Klingons.   So you guys get to bank 2 this round
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 13, 2004, 10:22:50 am
planned meetings


BWHAHHAHHAHAHHA!!!!!    I don't think there ever was one.  At least not one I went to.   This is basically a J'inn's stream of consciousness server with poor Die Hard trying to pick up the pieces.

I really don't have the time to make plans like that.   I wish I did but I don't

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 13, 2004, 10:27:45 am
Ok, it's done and settled. Jinn has made the final ruling on it. The matter is closed as far as I'm concerened then.
Much as some may disagree, I'm really not here to argue, I'm here trying to have fun with my toys, let's all get back to that, ok?
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 13, 2004, 10:34:31 am


Oh and Krueg . . .  what will it take to get you to send me a note with your concerns instead of flaming away here and getting everyone all riled up?    Cash?  Women?   Subscription to PlayKlink Magazine?  Name it.  <sigh>



Nothing, Krueg is being a tool. Plain and simple. To lazy to bother fullfilling his responsibility as an admin and to ready to start pointing fingers publically instead of trying to work it out. Hell I wouldn't have minded If he posted his concern publically, but is caling us cheaters really necessary?

PS, I'll make the change you requested. Wouldn't want it to be to balanced against the Klingons.

Hm, as an Admin, should I have been notified of planned meetings to discuss these and other rule and set-up issues when they were being decided, rather than simply reading in the forums or emails that "rules updated per our conversation last".

As an Admin you were invited to as many "meeting" as we had. Our conversations occured either when we happened to catch each other on TS or through email. We copied you on every decision and answered every question you had. You never once offerred up a suggestion or backed up a question with any rational or arguement as to why you thought it shold be different. So when you asked a question we answered with our rational, in the absence of any other feedback we took your silence as agreement.

But honestly Krueg, did you make one single "admin" inquirory or suggestion that was just lobbying for your team? That wsn't what an admin was supposed to be there for.

Quote
Yeah, I blew up last night when I read that...if I got someone panties tied in a knot, I apologize. And I never called anyone a "cheater". If I really thought that was going on, I would not hesitate to do so.

F you Krueg, anyone that can read english can see you did. Here I'll remind you:

Quote
Now I see why the minimum build was raised from 50% to 75%
There's no way to for the Klingons to build a carrier unless we forfiet BPs, while the Feds can, since they have 10 BPs vs our 6, very clever.

You imply that this was done delibrately to screw the Klingons, which would be cheating. That was an apology, it was a backpedal. It take a person with Honor to apologize, how ironic that a player whose RP is supposed to deal with honor should be so lacking.

Quote
As far as sending a PM or email to you guys for an answer, quite frankly, I doubt I would have recieved an answer before the server started.

How about just posting a non-accusitory question, or request for clarification publically. Guess that just ain't your style.

Quote
Took a week to get an answer about the B-10 after asking twice.

So one of your questions about getting more for the Klingons got lost in the shuffle. It was answered though, I went to great lenghts to explain every one of your question when asked, but once again a slam.

Quote
I'm not even going to get into a Pi****g contest over this.

To late, you already pissed on everyone that worked so hard to create a server for you and the community to play on, while offerring nothing but petty gamesmanship in return.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 13, 2004, 10:36:36 am
KROMA!!!

grrr


Okay I'm making a GW4 Flamers Thread.

Everyone go there for fun. LEt's leave this for OoB stuff



Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 13, 2004, 10:39:25 am

Before I explain myself any further, I'll say this.  Next time an Alliance officer "suggests" a build schedule for a Coalition race, especially if that officer has ties to Administration / Alliance High Command, and that build is obviously disadvantageous, (IIRC, C5s are "light" dreads, being squared off against 3 carriers) perhaps one should expect the perception of rule fixing, even in the case of an 100% honest mistake.   As this situation is cleared (we're allowed to build the carrier), I would rather not debate it anymore.

You are a complete idiot, the Coalition admin and everyone of you had an opportunity to review this. No one suggested a build schedule with an "obvious" disadvantage. 

And you have yet to explain why you are such a tool.

You start by saying you expected the second half to be rough for the Coalition, but then go on to whine when it is.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FireSoul on November 13, 2004, 10:41:47 am
Kroma, please stop now. Issue's settled.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 13, 2004, 10:42:56 am
Ok, it's done and settled. Jinn has made the final ruling on it. The matter is closed as far as I'm concerened then.
Much as some may disagree, I'm really not here to argue, I'm here trying to have fun with my toys, let's all get back to that, ok?

What utter bullsh*t, you are just here to have fun, and NOT here to argue, you started it by accussing us of cheating. You are a F'ing tool. Of course you are through, you whined and accussed us of cheating, then got your way and are happy. Your to concerned about winning at any cost and without any honor to care about anything else or take responsibility for your action.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 13, 2004, 10:44:09 am
Kroma, please stop now. Issue's settled.

No the rules question is settled, the fact that Krueg is an arse is still out there.

I could have cared less about the rule, I simply posted it clearly with the potential ramification as a favor to Krueg so that he had time to change his build before the start and not lose a BP, and was responded to with an accusation.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 13, 2004, 10:44:28 am

planned meetings


Planned meetings?   :rofl:
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FireSoul on November 13, 2004, 10:46:20 am
Kroma, please stop now. Issue's settled.
No the rules question is settled, the fact that Krueg is an arse is still out there.


I'll try to be as sweet yet honest as I can here..
*ahem*. Kroma, STFU.   :(
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC on November 13, 2004, 10:47:04 am
Chill pill please gentleman, I have responsibilities as an admin on this forum and this thread is getting out of hand.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 13, 2004, 10:47:09 am
Kroma, please stop now. Issue's settled.
No the rules question is settled, the fact that Krueg is an arse is still out there.


I'll try to be as sweet yet honest as I can here..
*ahem*. Kroma, STFU.   :(

Why don't you get your team mate to take responsibility for his actions instead.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FireSoul on November 13, 2004, 10:49:42 am
Kroma, please stop now. Issue's settled.
No the rules question is settled, the fact that Krueg is an arse is still out there.


I'll try to be as sweet yet honest as I can here..
*ahem*. Kroma, STFU.   :(

Why don't you get your team mate to take responsibility for his actions instead.


I did. I was there last night. Please note that I initially disagreed with his take on things and told him that it was a written rule for a while. However, since the rule has been since updated that settled that.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 13, 2004, 10:51:24 am
Kroma, please stop now. Issue's settled.
No the rules question is settled, the fact that Krueg is an arse is still out there.


I'll try to be as sweet yet honest as I can here..
*ahem*. Kroma, STFU.   :(

Why don't you get your team mate to take responsibility for his actions instead.


I did. I was there last night. Please note that I initially disagreed with his take on things and told him that it was a written rule for a while. However, since the rule has been since updated that settled that.

Right, so all that is left is for Krueg to be a man and offer a real apology.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FireSoul on November 13, 2004, 10:54:16 am
Kroma, please stop now. Issue's settled.
No the rules question is settled, the fact that Krueg is an arse is still out there.


I'll try to be as sweet yet honest as I can here..
*ahem*. Kroma, STFU.   :(

Why don't you get your team mate to take responsibility for his actions instead.


I did. I was there last night. Please note that I initially disagreed with his take on things and told him that it was a written rule for a while. However, since the rule has been since updated that settled that.

Right, so all that is left is for Krueg to be a man and offer a real apology.


From earlier:

Quote
Yeah, I blew up last night when I read that...if I got someone panties tied in a knot, I apologize. And I never called anyone a "cheater". If I really thought that was going on, I would not hesitate to do so.

He did not call anyone a cheater. I witness to that.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 13, 2004, 10:57:17 am
Kroma, please stop now. Issue's settled.
No the rules question is settled, the fact that Krueg is an arse is still out there.


I'll try to be as sweet yet honest as I can here..
*ahem*. Kroma, STFU.   :(

Why don't you get your team mate to take responsibility for his actions instead.


I did. I was there last night. Please note that I initially disagreed with his take on things and told him that it was a written rule for a while. However, since the rule has been since updated that settled that.

Right, so all that is left is for Krueg to be a man and offer a real apology.


From earlier:

Quote
Yeah, I blew up last night when I read that...if I got someone panties tied in a knot, I apologize. And I never called anyone a "cheater". If I really thought that was going on, I would not hesitate to do so.

He did not call anyone a cheater. I witness to that.

Yes he did, already answered above. That ain't an apology for the accusation, it is an apology that his accusation might have pissed someone off. There is a big difference.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 13, 2004, 11:00:25 am
Basically, I am just sick of every single serve, after spending countless hour preparing and testing it so that everyone can have a place to have a little fun on, then having some ahole (an admin/RM no less) pull this sh*t again. I have never seen a bigger baby and poor winner in my life.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FireSoul on November 13, 2004, 11:01:31 am
Basically, I am just sick of every single serve, after spending countless hour preparing and testing it so that everyone can have a place to have a little fun on, then having some ahole (an admin/RM no less) pull this sh*t again. I have never seen a bigger baby and poor winner in my life.

You should imagine how I feel at times about the mod.
But Seriously, we gotta take it and just go have fun.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 13, 2004, 11:05:08 am
Basically, I am just sick of every single serve, after spending countless hour preparing and testing it so that everyone can have a place to have a little fun on, then having some ahole (an admin/RM no less) pull this sh*t again. I have never seen a bigger baby and poor winner in my life.

You should imagine how I feel at times about the mod.
But Seriously, we gotta take it and just go have fun.

Yeah I know you are right. The world is full of ungrateful a-hole. Shouldn't let them piss me off.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Paladin on November 13, 2004, 05:06:15 pm
I realize this topic (or where it's been going) is largely settled, but I'd like to take heat directed at DH for listing the DNL/DVLs on the build.  It's partially my fault.

I've always been a line pilot, so I was whaffling on deciding between a) DNL: something pretty cool that is based on things I'm used to flying; or b) DVL: one of those bl**dy carriers that usually blows me apart, expanding my playing horizon a bit hopefully.  I didn't want to overextend myself without flying both more, more importantly I didn't want to be given something worth VCs I'd only lose the first day or two in because of stupidity on my part.  It took me until this week to decide for sure.. I'm sorry it added to the chaos.

That said.. hope to see you ingame, all of you.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 14, 2004, 01:22:05 am
+1 CP for the Coalition for the capture of a Specialty ship. Pardek and I got Komodo in his NCD(+?)
Screenshot below just before it eneded.
GG to Nemo and Komodo, Nemo escaped in his CC+
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 14, 2004, 01:27:02 am
Hmm, well, just relooked over the rules and see there is actually no bonus for the capture of a specialty ship, only BP ships...my bad, thought we still got the CPs for such..bummer, wasted all those marines... :P
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 14, 2004, 01:42:34 am
Hmm, well, just relooked over the rules and see there is actually no bonus for the capture of a specialty ship, only BP ships...my bad, thought we still got the CPs for such..bummer, wasted all those marines... :P

Ain't hindsight a bitch?   it's actually a good idea.   Remind us for GW5.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 14, 2004, 01:50:05 am
Need to pass the word around to the Alliance, seems replacement ships for the CC+ is an NEC, saw 3 players running missions in them. They do need to understand they can't keep their replacement ship if is a specialty ship. Some players said they were not even aware what was considered a specialty ship and what wasn't. One player was spooted in 3 missions in a couple hr period, each time with a different specialty ship.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 14, 2004, 01:56:43 am
Need to pass the word around to the Alliance, seems replacement ships for the CC+ is an NEC, saw 3 players running missions in them. They do need to understand they can't keep their replacement ship if is a specialty ship. Some players said they were not even aware what was considered a specialty ship and what wasn't. One player was spooted in 3 missions in a couple hr period, each time with a different specialty ship.

If somebody in unaware of a rule, politely inform them in generally chat.   If they do no comply, flame their ass into oblivion.

You figure the fricking "s" would be obvious enough  ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC on November 14, 2004, 06:04:06 am
First page needs updating, Jinn?
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Green on November 14, 2004, 06:48:04 am
You figure the fricking "s" would be obvious enough  ;D

True.  Problem is almost all of the ships in the yard have a C or an S prefix.  Very few and very limited types of ships for non-OOB players to play.

What about the idea of opening-up some of the S ships after they become a bit more obsolete?  Some something like YFA +5 years for some of the ships?
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 14, 2004, 09:01:39 am
You figure the fricking "s" would be obvious enough  ;D

True.  Problem is almost all of the ships in the yard have a C or an S prefix.  Very few and very limited types of ships for non-OOB players to play.

What about the idea of opening-up some of the S ships after they become a bit more obsolete?  Some something like YFA +5 years for some of the ships?

In the Klingon yards it's the same story. But it needs to work the same for both sides. Our yard was full of almost nothing but specialty ships, Capitol ships and completely useless ships like frieghters (we really should just restrict those to keep them out of the yards completely)
Seems the Tholian yards are working nice, almost every Tholian player I've seen on has a BCH. At one time, 3 out of 4 Tholian players were flying BCHs at once.  Until I pointed out that Tholians were only allowed 1 at a time. Strange, Jinn was even flying one and didn't inform the rest.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Paladin on November 14, 2004, 09:14:55 am
Hmm... maybe it's some newer Alliance players (the CC+ to NEC bit).. I'll try to keep an eye out and point them in the right direction for the proper CnC rules.  I haven't encountered any Coalition who aren't aware of the s or c designations... I doubt it's intentional really.  Fairs' fair though.

I like the idea of getting VCs for capturing VC ships too, it can be a pretty difficult thing to pull off.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 14, 2004, 09:28:53 am
Strange, Jinn was even flying one and didn't inform the rest.

Actually, yes we were talking about it.  The Tholian ships aren't marked with c's and I didn't even realize that BCP was considered a BCH until someone asked.   WHOOPS.   

The T-BCP (the BCH) is screwed up anyways.   3 PH-1 come in as PH-3s  :(   so I doubt we'll see too many of them.  I'm not sure if there are other BCHs.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 14, 2004, 09:34:43 am
Updated.   I only saw 1 update to make and that was Krueg and Pardek's kill.

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC on November 14, 2004, 09:40:01 am
Thankyou J'inn, I was interested to know if there had been any more kills other than Komodo being captured, that was the only one I could find as well.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 14, 2004, 09:44:49 am
I'll start R'ing out the usels specialty ships so their is less spam in the yards.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBF-Crim on November 14, 2004, 12:11:40 pm

 I didn't even realize that BCP was considered a BCH until someone asked.   WHOOPS.   


Nothing personel...please dont take it so.....I appreciate the time and effort it takes to put up a server....and this isnt directed at anyone in particular...and not meant to be a flame of anykind......but this is another signpost that we have gone too far with the rules and restrictions....

As a casual player...I dont play enough to request a special ship....I dont play enough to warrant one....and I dont feel that I should have to request a damn frigate or destroyer or even a CL when they are fodder in real time , and that I might only fly for 5 or 6 hours a frickin week......

It's no longer worth the grief of fighting for gaming time at all...I'm lucky to get an hour day to play undisturbed between work and family and I'm not going to spend that hour being glorified AI for a bunch of nutters...

I'm sorry...but we have now stooped to restricting not only light cruisers, but frigates and destroyers as well?......are frieghters next?...command varients?....refitted ships?...any varients at all?

How bout we just can the entire list and only allow tourney ships?....why bother using OP+ as a base at all?

Why bother to play at all?...just flip a coin and see who won... :-\

It's just no fun anymore....it's more bother than thrill.... :(

I can no longer justify trying to schedual playing time....or shaving time from my sleep hours to play....or the hassle of fighting two teenagers for PC time.....or the dirty looks from the wife when other more important things need done...

Where will this maddness end?.....well...for me...it ends now....I will no longer be playing under these current restrictions...the restrictions have become a farce....and for me....it's no longer worth the time or effort to game under the current trend....

A sad day indeed.... :'(

Time to clean the garage I think...










Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 14, 2004, 12:14:05 pm
Strange, Jinn was even flying one and didn't inform the rest.

Actually, yes we were talking about it.  The Tholian ships aren't marked with c's and I didn't even realize that BCP was considered a BCH until someone asked.   WHOOPS.   

The T-BCP (the BCH) is screwed up anyways.   3 PH-1 come in as PH-3s  :(   so I doubt we'll see too many of them.  I'm not sure if there are other BCHs.

And just so ya know, was jestamessing with ya on this, wasn't a huge deal.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Grim on November 14, 2004, 12:40:31 pm

I think the arguments in this thread and arguments on the past few dynas sum up why a lot of people choose to not play annymore.

There needs to be some change or the playerbase will continue to decrease as a result.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 14, 2004, 12:49:17 pm
As i posted in another thread,  the GW (SFB) type server should not be the only server.

We are in real need of a much more open server SOON!!!

I'd like to see a unrestricted server myself.   Hell I'd even go for multi ship fleets again just for fun.

Slave Girls coming soon I hope????


Here's the problem . . .  for some reason or another certain servers are seen as big deals and others are not.   Maybe GW and SG get a draw because Dizzy and I have big mouths and advertise like crazy.   But we need to veiw all servers as serious game play opportunities.  There are not that many opportunities left, sad to say.

   

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 14, 2004, 01:14:26 pm

I think the arguments in this thread and arguments on the past few dynas sum up why a lot of people choose to not play annymore.

There needs to be some change or the playerbase will continue to decrease as a result.

There is room for all types, some Dynas need to be less restrictive than others.  I think the next one we do should be a lot more open.

Until then, is it really that bad to have to fly line/command ships?   For christ sake, CWL and CCH ships are available for all.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Dizzy on November 14, 2004, 01:26:52 pm
deleted
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 14, 2004, 01:43:28 pm
BACK ON TOPIC!!!!   ;D

IKV Quill Beast, Drone Cruiser (D5D), Captain Ktaqh jeH  KIA against FPF-DennyCrane (whoever that might be . . . ) and 1AF-Father Ted.   A D5C died valliently in the battle as well.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: madelf on November 14, 2004, 01:56:06 pm
SSCF-LeRoy's DNLhas been laid down by my KRCS.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Lepton on November 14, 2004, 03:10:53 pm
I understand Crim's frustration, but if he has so little time to play, I am not sure he could earn the pp for one of the currently restricted ships on this server on some other type of server.  I basically find the D2 crappy.  What people want are interesting scenarios within a strategic context.  There's too much AI fluf in the D2, not enough substance.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 14, 2004, 03:34:18 pm
There's too much AI fluf in the D2, not enough substance.

Fluf is AI?   That explains the billion hours of playtime . . .

Strategy in D2 is an lillusion.  The fun comes from ignoring that fact, BSing with your buddiers on TS, and hunting down live players. 

There is no spoon . . .
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 14, 2004, 03:34:32 pm
SSCF-LeRoy's DNLhas been laid down by my KRCS.

WELL DONE MADELF!!  ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Ronin on November 14, 2004, 04:57:07 pm
Last night (Saturday) in a 30-minute shootout I defeated deadmansix in his F-sCVD (with A-10 fighters according to deadmansix) with my R-KRCS. I have the game film and an end-game screen shot if it is required for anything. Deadmansix flew well and used his fighters to great effect. I landed some lucky shots on his hull and slowed him down enough to eventually drag him down. <S> to Deadmansix for a game well played. Was an honor, my friend!

Jolan'tru
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Ronin on November 14, 2004, 05:01:29 pm
There's too much AI fluf in the D2, not enough substance.

Fluf is AI?   That explains the billion hours of playtime . . .

Strategy in D2 is an lillusion.  The fun comes from ignoring that fact, BSing with your buddiers on TS, and hunting down live players. 

There is no spoon . . .

I could not agree more. Well said.

Jolan'tru
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: 762_XC on November 14, 2004, 09:02:10 pm
It Ronin season!

Smithers! Release the hounds!
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 15, 2004, 12:52:57 am
Scratch another Specialty ship...Tobin's NCD+. He was doing OK until he failed to notice the wave of drones form his now captured CAD helper.  ;)
GG, sir.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Tobin Dax on November 15, 2004, 05:57:55 am
Yeah, I failed to notice the capture and was going to form up with the CAD+ when reality took a nasty turn. At least I was able to destroy Reyam's RGK with my NCD before you nialed my poor little ship. GG.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC on November 15, 2004, 02:06:53 pm
2275 Alliance builds

New Builds:
1. F-CVA+ (Bearslayer)
2. F-DNG (OPEN - Most likely Father Ted)
3. F-DNG (FPF-TraceyG)

Specialty ships:

1. F-NCV (Corbomite)
2. F-NCV (76t00l)
3. F-NEC (KOTH-Soreyes)
4. F-NEC (FPF-BobGraham)
5. F-NEC (Surfal)
6. F-NCV (Hexx)
7. F-NCV (KAT-Ajax)
8. F-CAD+ (9th IceHawk)
9. F-CAD+ (FPF-TobinDax)
10. F-NCV (Kroma)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Ronin on November 15, 2004, 02:46:40 pm
It Ronin season!

Smithers! Release the hounds!

But 762... I was agreeing with DieHard, brother. hehe (Of course, it can still be "Ronin Season" as me and Bugs Bunny always enjoy that game.)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 15, 2004, 02:51:11 pm
2275 Alliance builds

New Builds:
1. F-CVA+ (Bearslayer)
2. F-DNG (OPEN - Most likely Father Ted)
3. F-DNG (FPF-TraceyG)

Specialty ships:

1. F-NCV (Corbomite)
2. F-NCV (76t00l)
3. F-NEC (KOTH-Soreyes)
4. F-NEC (FPF-BobGraham)
5. F-NEC (Surfal)
6. F-NCV (Hexx)
7. F-NCV (KAT-Ajax)
8. F-CAD+ (9th IceHawk)
9. F-CAD+ (FPF-TobinDax)
10. F-NCV (Kroma)


Note, these may not be bought until 8PM EDT tonight when cycle begins, even if they are available in the yards before then. Just an FYI.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC on November 15, 2004, 04:34:17 pm
Its a bit late to tell us this now, half the Alliance are already in their new ships.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 15, 2004, 05:06:54 pm
Its a bit late to tell us this now, half the Alliance are already in their new ships.

DH's listing in the allaince forum by the year was a bit confusing. His purpose for that was just so folks new what ship would be available to choose from that cycle. The actual build/conversions, however, occur on the dates and times (8PM EDT) listed on the site.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 15, 2004, 05:10:38 pm
I too noticed this, But, since it has been done, let them go ahead this time and I'll tell my pilots to go ahead as well. But next time we'll make sure everyone knows to wait until after 8 pm, OK?  ;)

And the Klingons will build another C8V(flown by Skull) and a C8K(flown by GreyWuf). The Roms build a CNV (flown by Pardek) and bank 1 point.
Doomstone is getting a FDW, so is KHH_Mrogue, Ktaqh jeH, and Indy Shark. I'm taking a DWD.
More updates on this to follow later this evening.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 15, 2004, 06:15:58 pm

DH's listing in the allaince forum by the year was a bit confusing.

Not it wasn't.   READ THE FRICKING RULES PEOPLE!!!!!   :P

My CVA+ USS MacArthur is being transfered to FPF-Bach.   I'll be in a line ship for the next couple of days.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 15, 2004, 06:22:51 pm

Not it wasn't.   READ THE FRICKING RULES PEOPLE!!!!!   :P


Rules are for suckers.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT Chuut-Ritt on November 16, 2004, 07:26:28 am

Not it wasn't.   READ THE FRICKING RULES PEOPLE!!!!!   :P


Rules are for suckers.

Not to mention the server site is down at present...... ;)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Evil Kraven on November 16, 2004, 10:11:41 am
SSCF-LeRoy's DNLhas been laid down by my KRCS.

 :o ??? :-\ :rofl:
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 16, 2004, 01:19:47 pm
Updated.

Hey Wanderer!  How about some names for the new ships?



P.S.  I am taking lots of high quality pharmaceuticals.  You guys had better double check everything I do.

Drugs Good.  Ouchy throat bad.

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 16, 2004, 03:02:54 pm
Well, it was just ponited out to me (rubs sore eye) that I missed posting Farfarer taking a SPM and Julian taking an FHF. I am sorry, they did post Monday afternoon and I just missed it admist the other posts.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 16, 2004, 03:17:58 pm
Well, it was just ponited out to me (rubs sore eye) that I missed posting Farfarer taking a SPM and Julian taking an FHF. I am sorry, they did post Monday afternoon and I just missed it admist the other posts.

no biggie, LOTS of slack will be cut do to the confusing nature of this system.  ;D

Unassigned F-DNG is going to 1AF-FatherTed
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: madelf on November 16, 2004, 04:09:08 pm
Well, it was just ponited out to me (rubs sore eye) that I missed posting Farfarer taking a SPM and Julian taking an FHF. I am sorry, they did post Monday afternoon and I just missed it admist the other posts.

no biggie, LOTS of slack will be cut do to the confusing nature of this system.  ;D

Unassigned F-DNG is going to 1AF-FatherTed

Thanks DH.  Alot of problems we're having with the system, is the current rom ARM sucks at his job, we should fire his pointy eared butt.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Hexx on November 16, 2004, 04:14:08 pm
Well, it was just ponited out to me (rubs sore eye) that I missed posting Farfarer taking a SPM and Julian taking an FHF. I am sorry, they did post Monday afternoon and I just missed it admist the other posts.

no biggie, LOTS of slack will be cut do to the confusing nature of this system.  ;D

Unassigned F-DNG is going to 1AF-FatherTed

Thanks DH.  Alot of problems we're having with the system, is the current rom ARM sucks at his job, we should fire his pointy eared butt.

Yeah, but he can't fly either so what are you going to give him to do?
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 16, 2004, 06:34:37 pm
Killed Mog's R-FFH-K in my F-CB in an epic battle.   AI was involved, I had to run off the map from the AI as I was too beat up  ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Julin Eurthyr on November 16, 2004, 07:37:34 pm
Well, it was just ponited out to me (rubs sore eye) that I missed posting Farfarer taking a SPM and Julian taking an FHF. I am sorry, they did post Monday afternoon and I just missed it admist the other posts.

Please add to the list under Romulan ships:

RIS Rocky Horror, FlameHawk Heavy Cruiser (FHF), Ambassador Julin, CO
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: 762_XC on November 17, 2004, 12:29:16 am
KBF-MRogue's K-FDW destroyed by the USS Lagavulin (F-NCV).

gg
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Father Ted on November 17, 2004, 07:37:30 am
Reejr's SHR KIA by ButtheadTheFed in NAL and Father Ted in DNG.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KHH_Mrogue on November 17, 2004, 11:13:21 am
GG FRA_762_XC  thought that mine field might open ya up a bit and didn't realize you still had all those A10s left... :o  those bees were buzzing.  Thoroughly enjoyable game... thanks  ;D

KHH_Mrogue
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Farfarer on November 17, 2004, 12:42:52 pm
Bach and Tracey ( not sure who fired the kill shot) destroyed my Rom specialty ship, an s-SPHM.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 17, 2004, 07:54:03 pm
Updated.

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Capt_Bearslayer_XC on November 17, 2004, 08:01:48 pm
After a wild goose chase around the sun, Kroma got a tractor on FireSoul's  Imperial Standard.  Our fighters & drones did the rest in short order.

Scratch one flat top. (R-cSUB IIRC)

GG FireSoul
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 17, 2004, 10:59:23 pm
Kroma's specialty ship, an NCV, fell after a fearsome battle with my DWD, VGG, sir! <S>
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 17, 2004, 11:02:36 pm
Updated.

Thanks to Wanderer for making it look good.

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 17, 2004, 11:14:22 pm
Kroma's specialty ship, an NCV, fell after a fearsome battle with my DWD, VGG, sir! <S>

DWD!!!! I thought it was a DWL, oops. Guess I better look closer next time LOL, I kept waiting for you to fire all those disrupters. I really should have saved some of those phasers for PD or drank on less celebratory beer after getting the SUB. Ouch. But hey this way I get to try out all those cool Fed ships.

VGG BTW!!!
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FireSoul on November 17, 2004, 11:47:13 pm
After a wild goose chase around the sun, Kroma got a tractor on FireSoul's  Imperial Standard.  Our fighters & drones did the rest in short order.

Scratch one flat top. (R-cSUB IIRC)

GG FireSoul




However!.. I was able to capture DrAzteca's F-CF later on.
GG Azteca. ;)
http://pet.dhs.org/~firesoul/sfc2/gw4/scr00028.jpg

Do I get to keep it? Huh? Huh? :)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Sethan on November 18, 2004, 04:02:54 am
KAT-Ajax's F-NCV went down tonight to my KWR.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT Chuut-Ritt on November 18, 2004, 05:34:59 am


Do I get to keep it? Huh? Huh? :)

Sure just fly Fed!    ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Julin Eurthyr on November 18, 2004, 07:20:42 am
When I saw this:
RIS Rocky Horror / FastHawk-K Heavy Cruiser (FFHK) / Julin Eurthyr, CO

I figured I'd need to remind everyone of this post.
Well, it was just ponited out to me (rubs sore eye) that I missed posting Farfarer taking a SPM and Julian taking an FHF. I am sorry, they did post Monday afternoon and I just missed it admist the other posts.

Please add to the list under Romulan ships:

RIS Rocky Horror, FlameHawk Heavy Cruiser (FHF), Ambassador Julin, CO

I don't want any confusion, I am flying the FlameHawk.  I tried to do my post in a manner that would result in a quick copy/paste for the updater, but I see I goofed... :(

So, to make it easy for the cut/paste crowd...
Code: [Select]
[i]RIS Rocky Horror[/i] / FlameHawk Heavy Cruiser ([b]FHF[/b]) / Julin Eurthyr, CO
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: madelf on November 18, 2004, 11:35:30 am
IceHawk's F-CAD+ overcome in a 2v1 with me and WarSears.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 18, 2004, 11:43:14 am
Updated
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 18, 2004, 03:58:35 pm
Kroma's specialty ship, an NCV, fell after a fearsome battle with my DWD, VGG, sir! <S>

DWD!!!! I thought it was a DWL, oops. Guess I better look closer next time LOL, I kept waiting for you to fire all those disrupters. I really should have saved some of those phasers for PD or drank on less celebratory beer after getting the SUB. Ouch. But hey this way I get to try out all those cool Fed ships.

VGG BTW!!!

Ah, then it worked. I was careful to fire only 2 drones at a time until I got close hoping you'd think I was still in a DWL. That's also why I got so close at the end, to get a drone wave under your PD. Worked, but, you hammered me in return fire, was down to only 19 power in the end.  ;)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 18, 2004, 06:30:02 pm
2278 Federation builds effective 8 PM EST

Assignment will be posted later, ALL DNs have been recalled for re-assignment

Capital SHips:

New Builds (Banks 1 point)
1. F-DNH (Unassigned)
2. BCF (Unassigned)
3. BCF (Unassigned)
4. BCF (KAT-J'inn)

Old ships

1. F-CVAR
2. F-CVAR
3. F-DNH (Upgraded DNG) FPF-TraceyG
4. F-DNH (Upgraded DNG)
5. F-DVL

Specialty ships:

1. Conversion point to upgrade 2275 F-DNG to F-DNH
2. Conversion point to upgrade 2275 F-DNG to F-DNH
3. F-NCF (Hexx)
4. F-NCD+ (Age)
5. F-NCF (Chuut)
6. F-NCF (9th-Ryker)
7. F-NCF(SSCF-Leroy)
8. F-CAD+
9. F-NCV
10. F-NCF


Transfers:

1. F-NCV (Holocat) (From Corbomite)
2. F-CFR (FPF-Myriad ) (From FPF-Jem)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 18, 2004, 07:02:03 pm
Klingon builds for round 3:
C-7 Ktaqh jeH
C-7 Indy Shark
C-7 Dib

Dibs D5D transferred to  KDF Duros
DWD to WarSears
DWD to MiniMe
FDW to Trajen
FDW to Shadowlord
FDW to KHH_Mrogue
And The C8K will be upgraded to a C10K

4 BP
3 BP for a CNH going to Pardek. Pardek's CNV+ going to Firesoul. 1 BP of 4 unspent, banked with the other previously banked BP, leaving 2 in the bank. 
4 CP
One SUK going to Emerald Edge.
One Peregrine Mauler going to FarFarer.

Waiting for confirmation on last 2  CPs, will update later this evening.

*edited*
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 18, 2004, 07:04:31 pm
Jinn's getting a BCF?
Hunting Season is now OPEN!
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 18, 2004, 07:15:25 pm
The F-DVL will stay with SSCF-Paladin
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 18, 2004, 07:26:28 pm
One of the F-CVAR has been assigned to Frey.

Always tip your bar tenders . . .
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: madelf on November 18, 2004, 08:54:15 pm
Klingon builds for round 3:
C-7 Ktaqh jeH
C-7 Indy Shark
C-7 Dib

Dibs D5D transferred to  KDF Duros
DWD to WarSears
DWD to MiniMe
FDW to Trajen
FDW to Shadowlord
FDW to KHH_Mrogue
And The C8K will be upgraded to a C10K

4 BP
3 BP for a CNH going to Pardek. Pardek's CNV+ going to Firesoul. 1 BP of 4 unspent, banked with the other previously banked BP, leaving 2 in the bank. 
4 CP
One SUK going to Emerald Edge.
One Peregrine Mauler going to FarFarer.

Waiting for confirmation on last 2  CPs, will update later this evening.

*edited*

To conclude Krueg's post, this is the Romulan build

Romulan round 3 builds
One CNH (condor heavy DN, not sure of letter designation) goes to pardek
Pardek's CNV+ goes to firesoul
One more BP banked.

SUK to Emerald Edge
Peregrine Mauleler to FarFarer
KDP to MadElf
KDP to Sethan
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 18, 2004, 09:44:26 pm
FPF-Bach is keeping his CVAR
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC on November 18, 2004, 10:07:50 pm
Agave R-NKK + LordKriug K-DWD vs. TraceyG F-DNH + 762 F-NCV

LordKreug's DWD destroyed, Agave limps across the border.

Very good game.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 18, 2004, 10:23:26 pm
I'm almost glad, I hate flying droners...lol.
Got me all excited when I did that 106 internals on Tracey, tho. Can't do that with the run-of-the-mill Klingon ship.
Was a GG.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 19, 2004, 12:22:38 am
One of the Un-assigned BCFs goes to Corbomite.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 19, 2004, 08:48:19 am
Father Ted is Reclaiming his DNH
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 19, 2004, 12:55:30 pm
Updated.

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 19, 2004, 01:09:59 pm
Updated.



Grumble.   Killed by War Sears,
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: WarSears on November 19, 2004, 01:24:53 pm
Updated.



Grumble.   Killed by War Sears,

GG game Jinn could have went eather way I took a big chance and it paid off.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 19, 2004, 01:28:27 pm
Updated.



Grumble.   Killed by War Sears,

GG game Jinn could have went eather way I took a big chance and it paid off.

Either way??   ROFL!!!   I died in about 45 seconds.  What was the other way?  Me dying in 30 seconds??

I have zero clue how to fight a drone boat in a Feddie ship.

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 19, 2004, 02:15:47 pm
The Un-claimed Federation DNH goes to me  ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: GDA-Agave on November 19, 2004, 03:55:26 pm
Agave R-NKK + LordKriug K-DWD vs. TraceyG F-DNH + 762 F-NCV

LordKreug's DWD destroyed, Agave limps across the border.

Very good game.  :thumbsup:

Yes, very good game.

I think you might owe 762 and his crew a free round, he really performed his escort duty well.   I couldn't get back to hit you after you had sustained all that damage.    His long range sniping and my lack of rear shielding seemed an obstacle I couldn't get past.

Wonderful match!   :)


Agave
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Hexx on November 19, 2004, 04:13:12 pm
Updated.



Grumble.   Killed by War Sears,

GG game Jinn could have went eather way I took a big chance and it paid off.

Either way??   ROFL!!!   I died in about 45 seconds.  What was the other way?  Me dying in 30 seconds??

I have zero clue how to fight a drone boat in a Feddie ship.



Well apparently you should do the opposite of what you did...
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 19, 2004, 06:41:48 pm
SPQR-Pardeks R-CNH was destroyed in an epic 2 hour battle.  GG  :thumbsup:

http://69.115.120.11:9000/images/Pardek_CNH.rec
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 19, 2004, 07:10:29 pm
TobinDax gets the CAD+
Bosn gets the NCV
Kroma gets the NCF
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: SPQRPardek on November 19, 2004, 08:23:24 pm
GG DH !! man i was about to bail out and wanted to make one more pass !!
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 19, 2004, 09:10:29 pm
Unclaimed F-BCF is being claimed by FPF-DrAzteca
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: 762_XC on November 20, 2004, 12:35:30 am
Bearslayer (F-CB)
762 (F-NCV)

vs

Emerald Edge (R-SUK)

Superhawk goes down!
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: 762_XC on November 20, 2004, 12:36:17 am
Bearslayer (F-CB)
762 (F-NCV)

vs

Firesoul (R-CNV)

Scratch one flattop!
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Potemkyn on November 20, 2004, 01:04:07 am
Um, what's left out there?

Po~
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 20, 2004, 01:05:14 am
Um, what's left out there?

Po~

What race you flying?   new build cycle is tommorow.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Potemkyn on November 20, 2004, 01:10:40 am
As soon as I can get logged back in,     >:(

Okay, I'm logged back in.

Andromedans!  Oh, they ain't there.   ::)

Lyrans!!  Not included.  Bummer.   :o

Well then KLINGONS!!!  Unless there are too many Klingons, or not enough ships. 

Last choice would be Feds.

So, where can I fit in here?


Po~
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Wanderer on November 20, 2004, 02:36:55 am
Considering I'm the one that PM'd you about GW4, and I'm the one that got Tracey to fix your account at sfc2.net forums, and the fact you have a Fed ship in your avatar, you should most definately fly Fed.  ;D  Besides, we're the frickin' good guys.  8)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Corbomite on November 20, 2004, 08:29:58 am
I just lost my BCF to a 92% HET breakdown. I am done with this server as I have no more time to spare the rest of the month.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Dizzy on November 20, 2004, 09:00:28 am
I just lost my BCF to a 92% HET breakdown. I am done with this server as I have no more time to spare the rest of the month.

Well then I beat ya. I lost my NHK to Chuut's TBC with a 95% HET Breakdown... hehe. Sucks ASS doesnt it.

Too bad u cant be on the rest of the server. Our matches are always exciting. G/L and see ya next server corbo.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Potemkyn on November 20, 2004, 10:07:38 am
Considering I'm the one that PM'd you about GW4, and I'm the one that got Tracey to fix your account at sfc2.net forums, and the fact you have a Fed ship in your avatar, you should most definately fly Fed.  ;D  Besides, we're the frickin' good guys.  8)

Works for me.

What ship is left, a Police cruiser?   ;D

Po~
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 20, 2004, 11:20:20 am
Updated.

It was unclear which race killed Corbo.  So I gave the VCs to the Klingons for now.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: EmeraldEdge on November 20, 2004, 12:41:44 pm
It was the Romulans. ;)
Title: HELP!!! GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Potemkyn on November 20, 2004, 01:46:49 pm
Okay, I'm going to try and relaod OP and start from the beginning as something isn't working for me  ::)

I get the message "OP+ 3.4" found when running the GW4.exe...  And this, when following directions.  I must have missed something somewhere. 

And it was on a fresh OP load, with the 252r update.   ;)

Any and all suggestions appreciated
 :)

Po~
Title: Re: HELP!!! GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Strafer on November 20, 2004, 02:25:08 pm
Okay, I'm going to try and relaod OP and start from the beginning as something isn't working for me  ::)

I get the message "OP+ 3.4" found when running the GW4.exe...  And this, when following directions.  I must have missed something somewhere. 

And it was on a fresh OP load, with the 252r update.   ;)

Any and all suggestions appreciated
 :)

Po~

"Found"? or "Not found"?
If it's Not, then you need to DL and install OP+ 3.4 from klingon.stasis.ca. Either the model or no-model version will do, but you're better off with with...
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: madelf on November 20, 2004, 02:37:17 pm
Ok, Romulan builds for Saturday, round 4
Cashing in our 2 banked BP and making
PRA to farFarer
PRA to NAIL (why o why do we let him have nukes?)

KDP to Lear
KDP to Dizzy
KDP to Pardek
NHKF to Raza (or whatever you like, just post on dynaverse.net if you wanted a different specialty)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 20, 2004, 03:02:34 pm
 Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 8:50 am    Post subject: 2280 FINAL Ship Builds (tonight 8 PM EDT) 
   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Capital SHips:

New Builds (Spending our one Banked point)
1. F-DNH (Bearslayer)
2. BCFF (FPF-Myriad)
3. BCFF (Nemo)
4. BCFF (FPF-Jem)
5. BCFF (FPF-Bach)

Old ships

1. F-CVAR (Transfer from FPF-Bach) (t00l)
2. F-CVAR (Frey)
3. F-DNH (TraceyG)
4. F-DNH (DH123)
5. F-DNH (Father Ted)
6. F-DVL (SSCF-Paladin)
7. F-BCFF (FPF-DrAzteca)


Specialty ships:

1. PF refit for BCF
2. PF refit for Kroma's NCF
3. F-CLCF (Hexx)
4. F-NCV (Green)
5. F-NCV (SSCF-Ternado)
6. F-CAD+R (Deadman)
7. F-CAD+R (KOTH-SoreEyes)
8. F-NHP (FPF-Wanderer)
9. F-NHP (Lyrkiller)
10. F-NHP


Transfers:

1. F-NCF (From Hexx)
2. F-CVSR (From Green) To FPF-BobG
3. F-NEC (From FPF-BobG)
4. F-CF (From FPF-Myriad)
5. F-NEC (From KOTH-Soreeyes)
 
Title: ARG!!! GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Potemkyn on November 20, 2004, 03:31:37 pm
Okay, I'm going to try and relaod OP and start from the beginning as something isn't working for me  ::)

I get the message "OP+ 3.4" found when running the GW4.exe...  And this, when following directions.  I must have missed something somewhere. 

And it was on a fresh OP load, with the 252r update.   ;)

Any and all suggestions appreciated
 :)

Po~

"Found"? or "Not found"?
If it's Not, then you need to DL and install OP+ 3.4 from klingon.stasis.ca. Either the model or no-model version will do, but you're better off with with...


Um, that'd be NOT found.

User errors...

Po~
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 20, 2004, 05:09:34 pm
Un-assigned F-sNHP is going to BydaBlue
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Corbomite on November 20, 2004, 06:42:20 pm
It was the Romulans. ;)


Not true. There was a Klingon in the mission too. And to be clear I self destructed when I broke, knowing it was over.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 20, 2004, 07:41:12 pm
Klingon Round 4 Builds, etc.


OK, so far:
C-7 to Trajan
C-7 to KHH Mrogue
C-7 to KHH Devil40

D6U to KDF-Duros
D5D to Crim
D5D for Nail
DWD to Krueg
D5D to Lear
DWD to KHH MiniMe

Also have an FDW that will be transferred from Mrogue, waiting for answer now for confirmation.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Capt_Bearslayer_XC on November 20, 2004, 07:55:32 pm
AUGH!!!!!!

House sitting for a friend.... figured I'd save myself some trouble and copy all the SFC files I need to CD and just copy them on.... guess what?  I screwed up!!!

DL'ing presently....... ::)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: WarSears on November 20, 2004, 08:02:04 pm
I got Confused Kitty's NECR today. It was a great match a lot of Internals on both sides. :gg:
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Wanderer on November 20, 2004, 08:56:42 pm
Klingon Round 4 Builds, etc.


OK, so far:
C-7 to Trajan
C-7 to KHH Mrogue
C-7 to KHH Devil40

D6U to KDF-Duros
D5D to Crim
D5D for Nail
DWD to Krueg
D5D to Lear
DWD to KHH MiniMe

Also have an FDW that will be transferred from Mrogue, waiting for answer now for confirmation.

Krueg, I've been keeping a list of updates, shipnames, etc for J'inn, and from reading your new builds, I had a few questions for ya.

Duros had a D5D (IKV Longbow) -Destroyed or in dock?
MiniMe had a DWD -Presumably destroyed since he's getting another
Trajen had a FDW(IKV Swift Stealer) -Destroyed or in dock?

Near as I can tell, the following are in dock...

IN DOCK:

IKV Swift Axe / Fast Battlecruiser (FD7K)
IKV Crossbow / Drone Cruiser (D5D)
IKV Archer / Drone Cruiser (D5D)
IKV Longbow / Drone Cruiser (D5D)
IKV Swift Strike / New Fast Heavy Cruiser (FDW)
IKV Swift Killer / New Fast Heavy Cruiser (FDW)
IKV Swift Stalker / New Fast Heavy Cruiser (FDW)

...is this correct?  Or were any of these destroyed?

Both sides have had ships that were KIA and not reported, just trying to make sense of it all for J'inn.

Thanks.

Edit - I just noticed that Lear is getting both a R-KDP and a K-D5D?
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Wanderer on November 20, 2004, 09:15:40 pm
Ok, Romulan builds for Saturday, round 4
Cashing in our 2 banked BP and making
PRA to farFarer
PRA to NAIL (why o why do we let him have nukes?)

KDP to Lear
KDP to Dizzy
KDP to Pardek
NHKF to Raza (or whatever you like, just post on dynaverse.net if you wanted a different specialty)

Had a question for you as well, MadElf.  Was Fararius' FHP destroyed, or is it in dock, or transfered, or is he keeping it in case their are too many DN's on the board?

Thanks.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: EmeraldEdge on November 20, 2004, 09:50:03 pm
It was the Romulans. ;)


Not true. There was a Klingon in the mission too. And to be clear I self destructed when I broke, knowing it was over.

Ok, that's true, but you don't think you wouldn't won even if you hadn't broken down do you?  You'd tried that HET things already and it didn't work. :P
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Strafer on November 20, 2004, 10:28:20 pm
Testy's NCD go poof on a surprise reverse by TacoBell, Duros and myself. Not-so-little Miss Kroma was too far ahead/behind to help.  ::)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 20, 2004, 10:29:53 pm
Klingon Round 4 Builds, etc.


OK, so far:
C-7 to Trajan
C-7 to KHH Mrogue
C-7 to KHH Devil40

D6U to KDF-Duros
D5D to Crim
D5D for Nail
DWD to Krueg
D5D to Lear
DWD to KHH MiniMe

Also have an FDW that will be transferred from Mrogue, waiting for answer now for confirmation.

Krueg, I've been keeping a list of updates, shipnames, etc for J'inn, and from reading your new builds, I had a few questions for ya.

Duros had a D5D (IKV Longbow) -Destroyed or in dock?
MiniMe had a DWD -Presumably destroyed since he's getting another
Trajen had a FDW(IKV Swift Stealer) -Destroyed or in dock?

Near as I can tell, the following are in dock...

IN DOCK:

IKV Swift Axe / Fast Battlecruiser (FD7K)
IKV Crossbow / Drone Cruiser (D5D)
IKV Archer / Drone Cruiser (D5D)
IKV Longbow / Drone Cruiser (D5D)
IKV Swift Strike / New Fast Heavy Cruiser (FDW)
IKV Swift Killer / New Fast Heavy Cruiser (FDW)
IKV Swift Stalker / New Fast Heavy Cruiser (FDW)

...is this correct?  Or were any of these destroyed?

Both sides have had ships that were KIA and not reported, just trying to make sense of it all for J'inn.

Thanks.

Edit - I just noticed that Lear is getting both a R-KDP and a K-D5D?

Duros, still in service..
MiniMe... I actually somehow over looked I assigned it twice, seems so did he. He never bought one! Ok, I'll review the request for specialty ships and see who didn't get one this round to fix that. Thanks.
And Trajen's is being kept aside for the Xtra DN thing.
And yes, I also have discovered that some of the specialty ships were not being reported. I did remind my pilots to do so, and to be honest, I'm not 100% sure anymore, either. Don't care about the FD7K, tho. The FDW is far superior.
And yes, Lear is getting one for each of his Coalition accounts. Isn't he lucky!  ;D

*Edited* KBFKrotz is getting an FDW, so that's fixes the MiniMe thing...
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 20, 2004, 10:32:39 pm
I also don't see Trinity isn't listed for having a NCV, is that correct? Or did I miss it somewhere? Is so, NP. Oterwise, can we get someone to let him know?
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Potemkyn on November 20, 2004, 10:37:50 pm
Okay, figured it out.  Somehow I installed the OP+ 3.1 - don't ask as I have no idea how I clicked on that one...

GW4.exe installing as we speak - er type.   ;D

Next step is to either go around the router, or configure the beast.  It's an SMC...

Thanks, all!

 ;)
Po~
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 21, 2004, 12:23:01 am
I also don't see Trinity isn't listed for having a NCV, is that correct? Or did I miss it somewhere? Is so, NP. Oterwise, can we get someone to let her know?

Trinity is SSCF-Ternado.   My bad
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 21, 2004, 02:04:43 am
I also don't see Trinity isn't listed for having a NCV, is that correct? Or did I miss it somewhere? Is so, NP. Oterwise, can we get someone to let him know?

Trinity is SSCF-Ternado.   My bad

Ok, np. He died tonight in it anyway.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: EmeraldEdge on November 21, 2004, 03:20:21 am
Firesoul, Reejr and myself had a battle with Jem, Confusedkitty, and Deadmansix.

We killed Confusedkitty's CAD+R (or whatever suffixes that thing has) and Deadman's CB.   Unfortunately Jem got away, but not after hounding me out of the hex (I actually broke down on a HET right at the corner, but my speed carried me out of the hex).  Good stuff.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FireSoul on November 21, 2004, 03:36:19 am
Firesoul, Reejr and myself had a battle with Jem, Confusedkitty, and Deadmansix.

We killed Confusedkitty's CAD+R (or whatever suffixes that thing has) and Deadman's CB.   Unfortunately Jem got away, but not after hounding me out of the hex (I actually broke down on a HET right at the corner, but my speed carried me out of the hex).  Good stuff.

The players were:

Jem's F-BCFF
Deadman's F-CB
ConfusedKitty's (Soreyes?) F-CAD 

My (FireSoul)'s R-SPJ
Reejr's R-NHK
EmeraldEdge's R-NHK

Terrain: BlackHole.


GG guys. ;)
-- Luc
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: madelf on November 21, 2004, 05:07:49 am
Ok, Romulan builds for Saturday, round 4
Cashing in our 2 banked BP and making
PRA to farFarer
PRA to NAIL (why o why do we let him have nukes?)

KDP to Lear
KDP to Dizzy
KDP to Pardek
NHKF to Raza (or whatever you like, just post on dynaverse.net if you wanted a different specialty)

Had a question for you as well, MadElf.  Was Fararius' FHP destroyed, or is it in dock, or transfered, or is he keeping it in case their are too many DN's on the board?

Thanks.

I'd forgotten about that mauler.  I'll try and transfer it to someone posthaste
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Davey-E on November 21, 2004, 06:05:48 am
ermm

Can i have a s ship please  ;D  if pos
Any will do, but like very much the BCFF    ;D ;D but any OK

Davey
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: RazalYllib on November 21, 2004, 09:18:28 am
Ok, Romulan builds for Saturday, round 4
Cashing in our 2 banked BP and making
PRA to farFarer
PRA to NAIL (why o why do we let him have nukes?)

KDP to Lear
KDP to Dizzy
KDP to Pardek
NHKF to Raza (or whatever you like, just post on dynaverse.net if you wanted a different specialty)


I went w/ KDP...
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 21, 2004, 11:47:37 am
ermm

Can i have a s ship please  ;D  if pos
Any will do, but like very much the BCFF    ;D ;D but any OK

Davey

Ask in the Allaince forums.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Corbomite on November 21, 2004, 12:27:00 pm
It was the Romulans. ;)


Not true. There was a Klingon in the mission too. And to be clear I self destructed when I broke, knowing it was over.

Ok, that's true, but you don't think you wouldn't won even if you hadn't broken down do you?  You'd tried that HET things already and it didn't work. :P






Oh, not a chance in hell did I have of winning. My job was to keep you two busy long enough to have the players running missions under us retake the base. I had no intention of getting destroyed though. I could have flown off at any time, just some bad luck caught up with me first. GG anyway. I always enjoy battling you EE.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Age on November 21, 2004, 12:30:03 pm
Testy's NCD go poof on a surprise reverse by TacoBell, Duros and myself. Not-so-little Miss Kroma was too far ahead/behind to help.  ::)
Yep but then server went poof and I still have my NCD after I went poof  lucky breaks  oh well I was told to get rid of it  which I will .I will try never never to get close to a Rom ship agian .Let see now 2 from Tacobell 1 from Firesoul I from Likkerpig 1 From Sethan .They are all Rom and got me with the exception of Krueg and Spardek ganging up on me .They never use Tractor beams in SFC2 at Admiral level why? They get used in SFC3 . What does GG mean Good Game or Goodie Goodie I would assume the first.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC on November 21, 2004, 01:29:40 pm
GG = Good Game
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 21, 2004, 01:31:16 pm
TacoBell found nemo and died.   I think he was in a KDP
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Hexx on November 21, 2004, 03:35:20 pm
CLCF was lost due to a combination of catastrophic structural failure and typical Federation engineering department incompetence.
Believe it was Doomstone who administered the coup-de-grace.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 21, 2004, 05:30:13 pm
Bearslayer Killed Devil40's K-C7
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Capt_Bearslayer_XC on November 21, 2004, 07:09:19 pm
Killed Pardek's KDP also.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 21, 2004, 07:48:30 pm
WS and I toasted Byda's NCP.
GG.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: [KBF]MuadDib on November 21, 2004, 08:02:41 pm
gg myriad

scratch 1 bcff
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 21, 2004, 08:36:01 pm
UGH!  Updated but it's becoming hard to keep track of.  I guess the PvP VCs is the real important stuff.   Feel free to double check me.

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Potemkyn on November 21, 2004, 10:16:32 pm
ermm

Can i have a s ship please  ;D  if pos
Any will do, but like very much the BCFF    ;D ;D but any OK

Davey

Ask in the Allaince forums.

Any CADs or NCDs left?

Po~
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 21, 2004, 10:46:37 pm
UGH!  Updated but it's becoming hard to keep track of.  I guess the PvP VCs is the real important stuff.   Feel free to double check me.



Well, at a glance, see a couple things:
Doomstone is in a FDW, has been. I think his FD7K is the one you have listed "in yards"
The D6U to KDF Duros has been KIA
And I'm kinda surprised that you have so many listed "in yards"
A) I think a couple of those got killed.
B) I thought if I had no pilot for a left over specialty ship, it was "lost"
We get to keep them in reserve after the original pilot upgrades to a diffrerent ship?
If so, I've pilots to fly them, but I thought by the wording of the rules that we couldn't.
Jinn? You're the boss here, what say ye?
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 21, 2004, 10:47:59 pm
Also, might re-interate to make sure everyone is reporting specialty ship kill. It'll make it easier to keep track of. I think many don't bother since they are worth no VCs of any kind.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 21, 2004, 11:21:40 pm
UGH!  Updated but it's becoming hard to keep track of.  I guess the PvP VCs is the real important stuff.   Feel free to double check me.



Well, at a glance, see a couple things:
Doomstone is in a FDW, has been. I think his FD7K is the one you have listed "in yards"
The D6U to KDF Duros has been KIA
And I'm kinda surprised that you have so many listed "in yards"
A) I think a couple of those got killed.
B) I thought if I had no pilot for a left over specialty ship, it was "lost"
We get to keep them in reserve after the original pilot upgrades to a diffrerent ship?
If so, I've pilots to fly them, but I thought by the wording of the rules that we couldn't.
Jinn? You're the boss here, what say ye?


Once built, the Empire has the ship until it goes boom.  I'm trying my best (with tons of help from Wanderer) to keep track of them all.

Assign them out.

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Brezgonne on November 22, 2004, 10:00:56 am
*snickers at the thought of assigning out the Tholian 312th Battle Fleet if it was actually used here*

 ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBF-Kurok on November 22, 2004, 12:50:38 pm
FPFBobG SVSR goes boom
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 22, 2004, 02:15:13 pm
FPF-Myriad's F-CB killed KBF-Kurok's D5D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 22, 2004, 02:54:50 pm
Capital SHips:

New Builds (Banks a point)
1. F-DNH (FPF-Bach)
2. F-BCFF (Kroma)
3. F-BCFF (FPF-TobinDax)
4. F-BCV (F14s) (Deadmansix)

Old ships

1. F-CVAR (t00l)
2. F-CVAR (Frey)
3. F-DNH (TraceyG)
4. F-DNH (Dh123)
5. F-DNH (Father Ted)
6. F-DVL (SSCF-Paladin)
7. F-DNH (Bearslayer)

8. BCFF (FPF-Myriad)
9. BCFF (Nemo)
10. BCFF (FPF-Jem)
11. BCFF (FPF-Bach) TRANSFERED to (9th IceHawk)
12. F-BCFF (FPF-DrAzteca)


Specialty ships:

1. F-CBF (FPF-Thrain)
2. F-NHP (Bosn)
3. F-CBF (FPF-DennyCrane, I want something to fly when my DN is in the shop   :police:)
4. F-CBF (FPF-Myriad)
5. F-CBF (SSCF-Leroy)
6. F-CBF (BlueByda)
7. F-CLCF (Hexx, remember it can't HET   ;D)
8. F-CLCF (Hexx, for when he forgets he can't HET   ;D)
9. F-CBF (FPF-BobG)
10. F-CAD+R (DaveyE)


Transfers:

1. F-CAD+R (From FPR-TobinDax) to (9th Ryker)
2. BCFF from (FPF-Bach) to (9th Icehawk)
3. F-CVDR form (FPF-PhiTemplar) to (Age)


CURRENTLY IN DOCK:

U.S.S. Manta Ray / New Fast Cruiser (NCF)
U.S.S. Avignon / Heavy Drone Cruiser (CAD+R)
U.S.S. Lagavulin / New Strike Carrier (NCV)
U.S.S. Wolverine / Fast Cruiser (CFR)
U.S.S. Fitzwallace / New Escort Cruiser (NECR)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 22, 2004, 07:18:56 pm
Ok, for Monday's build for the Klingons:
C-7 to Doomstone
C-7 to Kurok
C-7 to GhostElf

Upgrades @ 1 CP each:
Dib C-7 to C-7V
Trajan C-7 to C-7V
KHH_Mrogue C-7 to C-7F

New Specialty ships:
KBF Frankk gets FDW
Boylinux gets FDW
Azoz gets D5D

From Drydock:
Kaz gets DWD
Rock gets D5D

And for the Roms, Soth is getting a KHK, the others will be posted shortly, waiting for confirmations.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC on November 22, 2004, 07:32:36 pm
FPF-TraceyG (F-DNH) + FPF-Bach (F-CLC) vs. K'tejh-Jeh(something, not sure of spelling) K-C7

C7 destroyed. gg.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 22, 2004, 09:14:57 pm
In the bar at Battlestation 24,7 poor IndyShark and his C7 had the misfortune of getting cornered by Kroma and his BCFF. Needless to say Indy got sucked into Kroma's Blackhole. Scratch Indy's C7 and his virginity.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: madelf on November 22, 2004, 11:33:55 pm
Romulan Builds for round 4
KHK to Soth
KHK to Reejr

Transfer PRA to TacoBell

KDP to Firesoul
KRCSF to Firehwawk
KWV to Likkerpig
NHKF(OR suk, he's undecided) to Farfarer

SUK from the drydocks to Sethan
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: madelf on November 22, 2004, 11:47:40 pm
Ok, for Monday's build for the Klingons:
C-7 to Doomstone
C-7 to Kurok
C-7 to GhostElf

Upgrades @ 1 CP each:
Dib C-7 to C-7V
Trajan C-7 to C-7V
KHH_Mrogue C-7 to C-7F

New Specialty ships:
KBF Frankk gets FDW
Boylinux gets FDW
Azoz gets D5D

From Drydock:
Kaz gets DWD
Rock gets D5D

And for the Roms, Soth is getting a KHK, the others will be posted shortly, waiting for confirmations.
Unfortunatley, due to the rules, we have to have a DN made from one of the 2 races every round.  Change the klingon capital ship builds to C7 to Doomstone, C8VK to Kurok, scrap GhostedElf's C7
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 23, 2004, 12:02:49 am
Details, details...
Ok, Doom has offered to give up his C-7 instead and will fly the C8VK. Kurok will keep his C-7.
Still have the rolling point then.
Everybody happy?
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 23, 2004, 12:06:18 am
Crim's D5D died.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FireSoul on November 23, 2004, 01:35:12 am
Crim's D5D died.

That's fine. Pookie's FNCF died as well.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: RazalYllib on November 23, 2004, 07:22:45 am
Holocats sNVC is gone (last nite), could find enough pieces left to make a full accounting, or recycling even.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 23, 2004, 09:09:04 am
Almost forgot, last night Dib, WarSears and myself engaged Paladin, Trinity and Rykker.
Rykker's CAD go boom (along with Trinity's NAL) Paladin got away.
GGA
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: SSCF-LeRoy on November 23, 2004, 11:09:14 am
I also don't see Trinity isn't listed for having a NCV, is that correct? Or did I miss it somewhere? Is so, NP. Oterwise, can we get someone to let him know?

Trinity is SSCF-Ternado.   My bad

Ok, np. He died tonight in it anyway.

Correction: he was flying an F-NAL during that incident. The matchup was F-CAD+R (Rhyker), F-NAL (Ternado aka Trinity), and F-CBF (myself) vs K-C7v (Dib), K-DWD (WarSears), and K-DWD (LordKrueg). The NAL and CAD were destroyed while the CBF escaped.

GG to the Klinks. For us that battle was a complete and utter tactical fiasco. Talk about fog of war. I could write up a million things we did wrong on that one. Of course, me not being able to see names attached to ships didn't exactly help...
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Wanderer on November 23, 2004, 12:10:48 pm
Krueg and MadElf:

I just sent J'inn the latest updated lists for all three races.  When he gets it posted, could you look it over and make sure I got all your stuff correctly listed?

Thanks.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 23, 2004, 12:23:20 pm
I also don't see Trinity isn't listed for having a NCV, is that correct? Or did I miss it somewhere? Is so, NP. Oterwise, can we get someone to let him know?

Trinity is SSCF-Ternado.   My bad

Ok, np. He died tonight in it anyway.

Correction: he was flying an F-NAL during that incident. The matchup was F-CAD+R (Rhyker), F-NAL (Ternado aka Trinity), and F-CBF (myself) vs K-C7v (Dib), K-DWD (WarSears), and K-DWD (LordKrueg). The NAL and CAD were destroyed while the CBF escaped.

GG to the Klinks. For us that battle was a complete and utter tactical fiasco. Talk about fog of war. I could write up a million things we did wrong on that one. Of course, me not being able to see names attached to ships didn't exactly help...

I was refering to another day, sir. See the date of that post. I also posted about last night's battle long after that first one.  ;)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: SSCF-LeRoy on November 23, 2004, 12:30:01 pm
I also don't see Trinity isn't listed for having a NCV, is that correct? Or did I miss it somewhere? Is so, NP. Oterwise, can we get someone to let him know?

Trinity is SSCF-Ternado.   My bad

Ok, np. He died tonight in it anyway.

Correction: he was flying an F-NAL during that incident. The matchup was F-CAD+R (Rhyker), F-NAL (Ternado aka Trinity), and F-CBF (myself) vs K-C7v (Dib), K-DWD (WarSears), and K-DWD (LordKrueg). The NAL and CAD were destroyed while the CBF escaped.

GG to the Klinks. For us that battle was a complete and utter tactical fiasco. Talk about fog of war. I could write up a million things we did wrong on that one. Of course, me not being able to see names attached to ships didn't exactly help...

I was refering to another day, sir. See the date of that post. I also posted about last night's battle long after that first one.  ;)

Sorry. My bad.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Age on November 23, 2004, 05:27:48 pm
   I heard that Jem and Testy got Reejir last night in a not sure of the ship but cl or ca with ds on it,Jem was in a BCFF and Testy in a DWC.Testy says it was great flying with Jem just quote him on it.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBF-Kurok on November 23, 2004, 06:11:17 pm
Blue Byda  CBF goes boom.
GG Byda
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: SPQRPardek on November 23, 2004, 06:32:29 pm
TobinDax BCFF lost to the Klingon Defence Force's Duros ;D    GG
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: madelf on November 23, 2004, 07:10:19 pm
TobinDax BCFF lost to the Klingon Defence Force's Duros ;D    GG
Yay Pardek!  Hero to MuadDib!
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 23, 2004, 07:11:25 pm
Updated!!

And super duper thnaks to Wanderer for formatting and naming help.   If it weren't for that beard I'd have to sleep with him.

<snicker>  That should put him into therapy.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: IndyShark on November 23, 2004, 07:34:53 pm
In the bar at Battlestation 24,7 poor IndyShark and his C7 had the misfortune of getting cornered by Kroma and his BCFF. Needless to say Indy got sucked into Kroma's Blackhole. Scratch Indy's C7 and his virginity.

Hey, at least I won the mission! LOL True 400 pp for my C7 was a bad trade....
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 23, 2004, 08:12:41 pm
UGH!  Updated but it's becoming hard to keep track of.  I guess the PvP VCs is the real important stuff.   Feel free to double check me.



Well, at a glance, see a couple things:
Doomstone is in a FDW, has been. I think his FD7K is the one you have listed "in yards"
The D6U to KDF Duros has been KIA
And I'm kinda surprised that you have so many listed "in yards"
A) I think a couple of those got killed.
B) I thought if I had no pilot for a left over specialty ship, it was "lost"
We get to keep them in reserve after the original pilot upgrades to a diffrerent ship?
If so, I've pilots to fly them, but I thought by the wording of the rules that we couldn't.
Jinn? You're the boss here, what say ye?


Once built, the Empire has the ship until it goes boom.  I'm trying my best (with tons of help from Wanderer) to keep track of them all.

Assign them out.



Well, I don't know wtf I was thinking here...
Duros has NOT lost the D6U yet. Hadn't seen him again until tonight when he was most preturbed to find out I thought he had been KIA.
My bad, sir.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 23, 2004, 08:27:54 pm
Nail and StarDowner are taking D5Ds out of drydock. And IndyShark and WarSears are taking  FDW's also.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 23, 2004, 08:42:05 pm
I see also Ryker has taken another CAD out of drydock, any others that have not been posted?
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: 762_XC on November 23, 2004, 10:10:40 pm
The MacArthur went down in flames tonight. Someone made the stupid mistake of thinking a CVA+ had any prayer against a PRA.

gg Dizzy.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Dizzy on November 23, 2004, 10:21:18 pm
It's not the ship, it's the Captain. That being said, it is truly a glorious night for the Romulan Empire as the destruction of the MacArthur could not have been any sweeter than at the hands of 762, one of the best Captains in the game. Well played 7oo|. You just ALMOST made it to the border. And yes, the PRA does slightly edge the CVA+. But you are the kind of Captain who makes up for that deficit.

On a personal note, it hurt to kill a fleetmate. ;) gg bro.

EDIT: For excellent gallantry and courage in battle, the MacArthur's lifepods have been collected and returned to Federation space unharmed. I very much look forward to future engagements. ;)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Wanderer on November 24, 2004, 12:08:57 am
I see also Ryker has taken another CAD out of drydock, any others that have not been posted?

The last CAD we had in dock, U.S.S. Marseille, has been taken by Davey-E.

The NCV U.S.S. Hermes is being picked up by Green.
The NCF U.S.S. Devil Ray has been picked up by Pookie.

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FireSoul on November 24, 2004, 12:40:33 am
I see also Ryker has taken another CAD out of drydock, any others that have not been posted?

The last CAD we had in dock, U.S.S. Marseille, has been taken by Davey-E.

The NCV U.S.S. Hermes is being picked up by Green.
The NCF U.S.S. Devil Ray has been picked up by Pookie.

Don't forget to mark Green's previous ship, a F-NEC, as expired.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBF-Soth on November 24, 2004, 12:57:41 am
Soth KHK & Kaz DWD vs  DennyCrane DNH and Mistress Kroma BCFF : BCFF  toasted in a hail of plasma and drones while tractoring the DWD. GG guys
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Paladin on November 24, 2004, 01:03:41 am
Gah...

Haven't been posting battles here... sorry :/

So,

* However many times I drafted (usually two :P) coalition to be driven off the map (lost count)

* A few kills I stopped short and tractored the foe off the map, a few kills I meant to tractor because they fought hard... darn.

* Killed Toten earlier in his K7DR.. his name goes on the list of those I meant to tractor, valiantly fought...


<S> To all the captains I have faced, even when outgunned most fought hard.  Hope to meet you all again.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DrAzteca on November 24, 2004, 01:11:01 am
WarSears´s DWD did not made it this time to the border. Destroy it by FPF-DrAzteca´s F-BCFF.
GG
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Potemkyn on November 24, 2004, 01:26:54 am
Well, heck!  I missed all the action!

Finally got in to see that there were no seervers - just a few minutes ago. 

Is there some setting I need to adjust?  I did not see any servers.


Po~
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Dizzy on November 24, 2004, 03:09:58 am
There are 4-5 servers running most of the time u login to the dynaverse. 2x always show up... But for some reason the others... they show up when u Refresh the list. Hit that refresh button, and there is like a 5 sec delay b4 the list updates and u can do it again.

It freaking took my 5x Refreshes to see the ***GW4 Server***. That server doesnt show up onm the list, but its always there if u refresh enough. DH, is thios fixable?

As for you not seeing ANY... perhaps you did not patch ur server login addy thing. There's a sticky about it on this forum. Ck it out. Otherwise, dunno.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC on November 24, 2004, 05:33:39 am
FPF-TraceyG (F-DNH) + FPF-Jem (F-BCFF) + ButtheadtheFed (F-HDWC2) vs. TacoBell (R-PRA) + Agoz (K-D5DR)

D5DR destroyed. PRA tacobelled.

Vgg.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Wanderer on November 24, 2004, 05:58:43 am
Don't forget to mark Green's previous ship, a F-NEC, as expired.
Since it hasn't been posted as KIA by whomever might have killed it, it'll be in dock.

Updated!!

And super duper thanks to Wanderer for formatting and naming help.   If it weren't for that beard I'd have to sleep with him.

<snicker>  That should put him into therapy.
Too late, already there from all the mooks not posting their kills...and just what's wrong with my beard?  It's warm and fuzzy, you should relate.  ;)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Dizzy on November 24, 2004, 07:01:25 am
FPF-TraceyG (F-DNH) + FPF-Jem (F-BCFF) + ButtheadtheFed (F-HDWC2) vs. TacoBell (R-PRA) + Agoz (K-D5DR)

D5DR destroyed. PRA tacobelled.

Vgg.

Oh, that tells a horrid story! Let's be a bit more descriptive... ;) Tracey ate all my plasma like a good little girl and got real sick. So sick that she could barely walk... Butthead... he was comatose. I dont know why he didnt die, honestly...he sure should have. Jem saved your life Tracey, that and a corner. I do agree it was a vgg.

Oh, but we need to straighten out one minor problem here... I didnt tacobell. When I have a battlecruiser tractored trying to spin him off the map so he flies off leaving your rotting carcass for me to devour, only getting pushed off myself, is not tacobelling. No. Let me tell you what tacobelling is so you know. Doing a 'TacoBell' is to flee off the map w/o having given any fight whatsoever. It is when you feel you are outclassed so severely that any attempt to engage will be fraught with self fear and death. Kinda like what you did when i engaged you in a 1 on 1. ;)



Ok! Hope that clears it up. ::hugs and kisses::

Diz
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: GDA-Agave on November 24, 2004, 08:10:47 am
FPF-TraceyG (F-DNH) + FPF-Jem (F-BCFF) + ButtheadtheFed (F-HDWC2) vs. TacoBell (R-PRA) + Azog (K-D5DR)

D5DR destroyed. PRA tacobelled.

Vgg.

Yes, once again I lose my ship in battle with Dizzy.   Hmmmmm, I'm starting to see a theme here. ( ;D j/k)

ButtheadtheFed, I don't know HOW you survived!!?   Must be that hard head of yours.

VGG to all.   The small map made this battle very interesting.   There were some big ships that we had to fit into a little map.   :o

Agave


Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: WarSears on November 24, 2004, 09:29:58 am
WarSears´s DWD did not made it this time to the border. Destroy it by FPF-DrAzteca´s F-BCFF.
GG

That was a very very good game DrAzteca You played that just like you should fight a droner.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBF-Nail on November 24, 2004, 10:42:48 am
U mean he tractored u and used u as a shield vs a SBX? ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Doomstone on November 24, 2004, 02:21:55 pm
Don't forget to mark Green's previous ship, a F-NEC, as expired.
Since it hasn't been posted as KIA by whomever might have killed it, it'll be in dock.


So you're saying you can't keep track of your own ships. Green never mentioned it to you?

If that's how the Federation handles their administrative ops, fine. I killed all your specialty ships. Please remove them all from drydock.

[/well-deserved sarcasm OFF]

KOTHGreen's NEC destroyed by Doomstone and Firesoul. Green valiantly sacrificed his ship to allow Die Hard to limp his burning hulk of what used to be a DNH over the border.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Green on November 24, 2004, 02:32:16 pm

KOTHGreen's NEC destroyed by Doomstone and Firesoul.

What doomstone said.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 24, 2004, 02:35:18 pm



If that's how the Federation handles their administrative ops, fine.


Administration is work fit only for women and cowards, not warriers. Hmph, Klingons.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Wanderer on November 24, 2004, 06:10:48 pm
Don't forget to mark Green's previous ship, a F-NEC, as expired.
Since it hasn't been posted as KIA by whomever might have killed it, it'll be in dock.


So you're saying you can't keep track of your own ships. Green never mentioned it to you?

If that's how the Federation handles their administrative ops, fine. I killed all your specialty ships. Please remove them all from drydock.

[/well-deserved sarcasm OFF]

KOTHGreen's NEC destroyed by Doomstone and Firesoul. Green valiantly sacrificed his ship to allow Die Hard to limp his burning hulk of what used to be a DNH over the border.


It's not my responsibility to keep track of our ships, it's YOURS to post any kills.  I'm doing this out of courtesy for J'inn, trying to keep track of Alliance AND Coalition ships.  Well deserved sarcasm my a**.  What's well deserved is your nickname amongst the Alliance.

Oh, and Frylock is 10 times cooler than you will ever be.  ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: madelf on November 24, 2004, 06:17:54 pm



If that's how the Federation handles their administrative ops, fine.


Administration is work fit only for women and cowards, not warriers. Hmph, Klingons.
Biggot :P
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Dizzy on November 24, 2004, 06:29:52 pm
Was it pookie kroma and bonk?

I tractored one of them at the border... I was suppposed to have it on repel... lol. That's what makes the game so intense. One little mistake can be death. GG.

Madelf, I bought a freighter. I figure I'll spend a long time delivering goods to pay for that thing. ::sniff::
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: drb on November 24, 2004, 06:42:01 pm
Hoi Folks,

Pookie is pleased to report that Tacobell was disgraced on the field of battle this day. The Romulan Empire has been relieved of their "Big Nasty" PRA. Green (NCV) , Bonk (CCR) and drb (NCF) used "Dizzy-ing tactics" to much success. Pookie SLAPPED a tractor on him after brushing aside the Roms ineffective plasma, and Bonk and Green feed Tacobell his meds, right on the boarder.
 You were looking a little under the weather there Tacobell we were only trying to comfort you, really. hehe

Take care

drb (aka pookie the comfort wing)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Bonk on November 24, 2004, 06:48:15 pm
Sorry bout that Diz... hehe...  ;D

http://www.dynaverse.net/downloads/repository/Film_Room/General/GW4-Dizzy-loses-R-PRA-Bonks-Film.rec

http://www.dynaverse.net/downloads/repository/Images/OP%20Screenshots/GW4-Dizzy-loses-R-PRA-01.jpg
http://www.dynaverse.net/downloads/repository/Images/OP%20Screenshots/GW4-Dizzy-loses-R-PRA-02.jpg

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Green on November 24, 2004, 07:49:44 pm
Was it pookie kroma and bonk?

Ack ... confusing me with Kroma ... do you have any idea the number of years of therapy I'll now have to endure?

3v1, one sided. GG.

PS - Pookie had a very high level tractor on you when he grabbed ya.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Dizzy on November 24, 2004, 07:51:21 pm
Apologies, Green.

Edit, yeah, I caught Pookie in a LvL 3 myself... <Real Smart>
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: [KBF]MuadDib on November 24, 2004, 08:33:37 pm
ok so for the record here...any of you that have died by my hand that went unreported...

you know who you are...

but ur ship wasnt worth the post here in this thread...well...that i can remember...and hell if i can find that post listed "fun kills" after about a page and a half searching through this darn thing...bah theres a server to play on...and if did indeed forgot anyone...you should be happy huh? but for the all that is sacred would you please post now if i did forget?!  thx  :screwloose:
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Capt_Bearslayer_XC on November 24, 2004, 09:40:11 pm
Ummm.... in English now?
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DrAzteca on November 24, 2004, 11:50:58 pm
LordKrueg´s DWD caught me behind enemy lines. Too bad for him. Destroy it by FPF-DrAzteca´s F-BCFF.
GG.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Doomstone on November 25, 2004, 02:21:13 am

It's not my responsibility to keep track of our ships, it's YOURS to post any kills. 

As an RM it IS your obvious responsibility to keep track of your own ships. And the fact that Green died in mission with Die Hard makes your feeble attempt at a pseudo-rules-lawyering cheat even more absurd.

I might have got around to posting it when I was tired of playing - if FireSoul hadn't already said he was going to post. Kudos to Green for stepping in to confirm the battle for his bumbling RM.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Wanderer on November 25, 2004, 04:02:36 am

It's not my responsibility to keep track of our ships, it's YOURS to post any kills. 

As an RM it IS your obvious responsibility to keep track of your own ships. And the fact that Green died in mission with Die Hard makes your feeble attempt at a pseudo-rules-lawyering cheat even more absurd.

I might have got around to posting it when I was tired of playing - if FireSoul hadn't already said he was going to post. Kudos to Green for stepping in to confirm the battle for his bumbling RM.


Well, gosh, thanks for promoting me, but if you had been paying attention, you might have noticed that I don't have "RM" at the end of my name in game.  Gee, and why do you think that is?  Could it be that I'm not the RM? Wow, what a revalation!  And, as I stated originally, I've been doing this as a courtesy to J'inn, to help out with the overall campaign.  What have you ever bothered to do to help out with the community?

And I certainly wouldn't be making any "bumbling RM" comments, considering Krueg has had just as hard a time keeping track of a difficult OoB system, even reporting one of his players as KIA when he wasn't.  So, is he bumbling as well?  Personally, I think he's done a commendable job with, as I said, a difficult OoB system, compounded by people on both sides not bothering to post their kills or if they were killed.  Not that it's the job of those killed to post, IT'S THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THOSE THAT MAKE THE KILL TO POST IT.  That's the only way the RM's can possibly try to keep track of the ships.

So, the next time you want to try to lay some smack down, make sure you have your facts straight (and that you're not insulting your own RM by inference) so you don't make yourself look like a dork again.


Cheers.  ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT Chuut-Ritt on November 25, 2004, 06:13:48 am
Was it pookie kroma and bonk?

I tractored one of them at the border... I was suppposed to have it on repel... lol. That's what makes the game so intense. One little mistake can be death. GG.

Madelf, I bought a freighter. I figure I'll spend a long time delivering goods to pay for that thing. ::sniff::


I think this is Dizzy in his freighter

(http://www.wtv-zone.com/ljsmeenge/FunnyAnimalPics/Dog_Driving_TacoBell.jpg)

<Snicker>
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Dizzy on November 25, 2004, 06:50:38 am
Cute, Chuut. I'm more of a German Shepard.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT Chuut-Ritt on November 25, 2004, 07:02:11 am
Cute, Chuut. I'm more of a German Shepard.


(http://www.fordogtrainer.com/pics/muzzles/m5/leather-dog-muzzle-m5-3d-on-dog-1.jpg)

 ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FireSoul on November 25, 2004, 08:06:30 am
Why is this an issue? On page 8, I posted:


I see also Ryker has taken another CAD out of drydock, any others that have not been posted?

The last CAD we had in dock, U.S.S. Marseille, has been taken by Davey-E.

The NCV U.S.S. Hermes is being picked up by Green.
The NCF U.S.S. Devil Ray has been picked up by Pookie.

Don't forget to mark Green's previous ship, a F-NEC, as expired.

Isn't that enough, or are you trying to tick admins off just because if gives you an opportunity? You know as well as I that he died against us protecting DieHard's badly damaged ship. Just remove that NEC from thedrydock, unless of course it has been killed, AGAIN.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 25, 2004, 08:15:24 am
Who is updating the first page, where all the ships are listed? I see several pilots who are no longer in their respective ships, as well as KIA VCs not added, etc.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Green on November 25, 2004, 08:58:24 am
... remove that NEC from thedrydock, unless of course it has been killed, AGAIN.

Nope, it was only killed once. ;)

And in a pre-emptive posting, Mrogue took the NCV I was flying this morning.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FireSoul on November 25, 2004, 09:30:14 am
... remove that NEC from thedrydock, unless of course it has been killed, AGAIN.

Nope, it was only killed once. ;)

And in a pre-emptive posting, Mrogue took the NCV I was flying this morning.

BTW Green, what you did in that missions was quite admirable.I respect that action as it saved your side's DN. Kudos. ;)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 25, 2004, 10:38:27 am
Who is updating the first page, where all the ships are listed? I see several pilots who are no longer in their respective ships, as well as KIA VCs not added, etc.

J'inn is.   I think he's trapped in a mall someplace.   ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Doomstone on November 25, 2004, 11:23:50 am
Well, gosh, thanks for promoting me, but if you had been paying attention, you might have noticed that I don't have "RM" at the end of my name in game.  Gee, and why do you think that is?  Could it be that I'm not the RM? Wow, what a revalation!  And, as I stated originally, I've been doing this as a courtesy to J'inn, to help out with the overall campaign.  What have you ever bothered to do to help out with the community?

And I certainly wouldn't be making any "bumbling RM" comments, considering Krueg has had just as hard a time keeping track of a difficult OoB system, even reporting one of his players as KIA when he wasn't.  So, is he bumbling as well?  Personally, I think he's done a commendable job with, as I said, a difficult OoB system, compounded by people on both sides not bothering to post their kills or if they were killed.  Not that it's the job of those killed to post, IT'S THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THOSE THAT MAKE THE KILL TO POST IT.  That's the only way the RM's can possibly try to keep track of the ships.

So, the next time you want to try to lay some smack down, make sure you have your facts straight (and that you're not insulting your own RM by inference) so you don't make yourself look like a dork again.


Cheers.  ;D

If you're not an RM, where do you get off dictating Alliance policy regarding what's in drydock? In that case just mind your own business and STFU.

Krueg is doing a good job and in fact is very careful to keep accurate records of what is in/out of drydock.

As for your ending every post with a personal attack (implied or otherwise), it reveals a lot about your character and intelligence level. I believe it also may be a violation of the T & C of this board.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 25, 2004, 12:10:51 pm
Well, gosh, thanks for promoting me, but if you had been paying attention, you might have noticed that I don't have "RM" at the end of my name in game.  Gee, and why do you think that is?  Could it be that I'm not the RM? Wow, what a revalation!  And, as I stated originally, I've been doing this as a courtesy to J'inn, to help out with the overall campaign.  What have you ever bothered to do to help out with the community?

And I certainly wouldn't be making any "bumbling RM" comments, considering Krueg has had just as hard a time keeping track of a difficult OoB system, even reporting one of his players as KIA when he wasn't.  So, is he bumbling as well?  Personally, I think he's done a commendable job with, as I said, a difficult OoB system, compounded by people on both sides not bothering to post their kills or if they were killed.  Not that it's the job of those killed to post, IT'S THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THOSE THAT MAKE THE KILL TO POST IT.  That's the only way the RM's can possibly try to keep track of the ships.

So, the next time you want to try to lay some smack down, make sure you have your facts straight (and that you're not insulting your own RM by inference) so you don't make yourself look like a dork again.


Cheers.  ;D

If you're not an RM, where do you get off dictating Alliance policy regarding what's in drydock? In that case just mind your own business and STFU.

Krueg is doing a good job and in fact is very careful to keep accurate records of what is in/out of drydock.

As for your ending every post with a personal attack (implied or otherwise), it reveals a lot about your character and intelligence level. I believe it also may be a violation of the T & C of this board.


Ok, Ok...let's ease up here Doom. PLEASE.
Both of you guys go to your room right now!  :P
It's being tracked and it'll all work out in the end.
The key to keeping all this stuff straight is having players, from BOTH sides posting the kill of a specialty ship and/or VC ships. Until very recently, many players didn't even bother to report anything unless it was worth VC points. I KNOW one of the ships listed earlier was KIA, even though it was listed in spacedock.
I struck it from the list when I handed them out.  ;)
And now, neither side has anymore in spacedock, so it's done.
Now, let's all sit back, crack open a beer, fire up a fatty and get back to killing each other like Gentlemen.  ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Jem on November 25, 2004, 12:26:58 pm
FPF-TraceyG (F-DNH) + FPF-Jem (F-BCFF) + ButtheadtheFed (F-HDWC2) vs. TacoBell (R-PRA) + Agoz (K-D5DR)

D5DR destroyed. PRA tacobelled.

Vgg.

Oh, that tells a horrid story! Let's be a bit more descriptive... ;) Tracey ate all my plasma like a good little girl and got real sick. So sick that she could barely walk... Butthead... he was comatose. I dont know why he didnt die, honestly...he sure should have. Jem saved your life Tracey, that and a corner. I do agree it was a vgg.

Oh, but we need to straighten out one minor problem here... I didnt tacobell. When I have a battlecruiser tractored trying to spin him off the map so he flies off leaving your rotting carcass for me to devour, only getting pushed off myself, is not tacobelling. No. Let me tell you what tacobelling is so you know. Doing a 'TacoBell' is to flee off the map w/o having given any fight whatsoever. It is when you feel you are outclassed so severely that any attempt to engage will be fraught with self fear and death. Kinda like what you did when i engaged you in a 1 on 1. ;)

    Now there are exceptions of course... Like when you do engage but then due to a bad situation, severe damage or something drastically similar, you must quickly run off the map to save your ship. This is a lesser type of TacoBell. Unfortunately, this exception didnt apply during our 1 on 1... sad to say...


Ok! Hope that clears it up. ::hugs and kisses::

Diz

Hey! I was trying to turn you back on the map to face my scatter and plasma at the same time! what a coincidence   ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 25, 2004, 12:33:22 pm
Well, gosh, thanks for promoting me, but if you had been paying attention, you might have noticed that I don't have "RM" at the end of my name in game.  Gee, and why do you think that is?  Could it be that I'm not the RM? Wow, what a revalation!  And, as I stated originally, I've been doing this as a courtesy to J'inn, to help out with the overall campaign.  What have you ever bothered to do to help out with the community?

And I certainly wouldn't be making any "bumbling RM" comments, considering Krueg has had just as hard a time keeping track of a difficult OoB system, even reporting one of his players as KIA when he wasn't.  So, is he bumbling as well?  Personally, I think he's done a commendable job with, as I said, a difficult OoB system, compounded by people on both sides not bothering to post their kills or if they were killed.  Not that it's the job of those killed to post, IT'S THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THOSE THAT MAKE THE KILL TO POST IT.  That's the only way the RM's can possibly try to keep track of the ships.

So, the next time you want to try to lay some smack down, make sure you have your facts straight (and that you're not insulting your own RM by inference) so you don't make yourself look like a dork again.


Cheers.  ;D

If you're not an RM, where do you get off dictating Alliance policy regarding what's in drydock? In that case just mind your own business and STFU.

Krueg is doing a good job and in fact is very careful to keep accurate records of what is in/out of drydock.

As for your ending every post with a personal attack (implied or otherwise), it reveals a lot about your character and intelligence level. I believe it also may be a violation of the T & C of this board.


Ok, Ok...let's ease up here Doom. PLEASE.
Both of you guys go to your room right now!  :P
It's being tracked and it'll all work out in the end.
The key to keeping all this stuff straight is having players, from BOTH sides posting the kill of a specialty ship and/or VC ships. Until very recently, many players didn't even bother to report anything unless it was worth VC points. I KNOW one of the ships listed earlier was KIA, even though it was listed in spacedock.
I struck it from the list when I handed them out.  ;)
And now, neither side has anymore in spacedock, so it's done.
Now, let's all sit back, crack open a beer, fire up a fatty and get back to killing each other like Gentlemen.  ;D

What Krueg said.   I find it amazing that things didn't get more confused with this jumbled OOB.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Dizzy on November 25, 2004, 01:05:21 pm
In a see-saw 45 minute fight that went down to the wire, Thrain's CBF finally succumbed to withering plasma fire. Thrain and his gallant crew were allowed to abandon ship before I destroyed it and all remaining crew have been rescued and returned to Federation space... Except for one or two human very cute females that are now my personal playthings...

Always fun when it's all about strategy, tactics and patience. ;) You are a worthy opponent. Oh, and that PF Pilot... I am torturing him atm...

  :gg:
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Capt_Bearslayer_XC on November 25, 2004, 04:36:45 pm
Scratch Mrouge's C7V.

Well fought but he came a little too close before trying to head over the border.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Doomstone on November 25, 2004, 04:51:17 pm
Scratch FPF-BachRM's F-DNH.

GG Bach! It took 55 minutes and change, but that was the most enjoyable 1v1 match I've had this server.

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Wanderer on November 25, 2004, 05:27:34 pm
Ok, Ok...let's ease up here Doom. PLEASE.
Both of you guys go to your room right now!  :P
It's being tracked and it'll all work out in the end.
The key to keeping all this stuff straight is having players, from BOTH sides posting the kill of a specialty ship and/or VC ships. Until very recently, many players didn't even bother to report anything unless it was worth VC points. I KNOW one of the ships listed earlier was KIA, even though it was listed in spacedock.
I struck it from the list when I handed them out.  ;)
And now, neither side has anymore in spacedock, so it's done.
Now, let's all sit back, crack open a beer, fire up a fatty and get back to killing each other like Gentlemen.  ;D

Alright, Krueg, I'll take the high road here instead of posting the scathing rebuttal I was writing.  But please make it known to your players how much I've busted my a** over the years for the good of the team and the community, how well you and I got along as opposite numbers during RDSL, and the fact that I've garnered a reputation for being an honest and stand-up guy.  Thanks.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 25, 2004, 05:43:09 pm
Wanderer, your reputation is known to me as well. That wasn't an issue with me at all, sir. The only reason I knew about the one error was because I already had it strached off form VT conersations. Probably just wasn't reported, like many others. Wasn't a problem.
It's all good... ;)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 25, 2004, 06:48:35 pm
Klingon Builds For Thurs:

C10K to WarSears
C7V to Krueg
C7V to Mazeppa (The great one returns!)

CPs:
Kurok get upgrade for his C7 to C7V
Pardek get FDWF
KBF Lord Munro gets a FDW
KHH_Morgue gets a DWD
IndyShark gets a DWD
Waiting for confirmation about remaining CP, will update ASAP.

Crim getsthe D6U (from Pardek)
WarSear's FDW will go into SpaceDock

Of the Romulan Builds:
KCRF to FireHawk
KHK to Sthan

CPs will be posted by MadElf when he get's back from Thanksgiving Dinner.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Capt_Bearslayer_XC on November 25, 2004, 06:52:33 pm
Lost my DNH to Warsears & Mazeppa

The Exeter's reign of terror is over.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Mazeppa on November 25, 2004, 06:56:56 pm
Lost my DNH to Warsears & Mazeppa

The Exeter's reign of terror is over.

I had only been on the Dynaverse 30 minutes, and get in on a Big Battle.  Pookie was your wing?    GG, Bearslayer.  Oh, and Doomstone was a Major Theme in the battle.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 25, 2004, 06:59:23 pm
A lot if stuff has been assigned to Spacedock and will given to pilots ASAP.  The holiday kinda F'd stuff up.


Capital SHips:

New Builds (Spends our 1 banked point)
1. F-DNH (FPF-DrAzteca)
2. F-BCV (F14s) (Hexx)
3. F-BCV (F14s) (KOTH-Green)
4. F-BCV (F14s) (Mistress_Kroma)
5. F-BCV (F14s) (Mounty)


Old Capital Ships

3. F-DNH (TraceyG)
4. F-DNH (Dh123)
6. F-DVL (SSCF-Paladin)
7. BCFF (Nemo)
10. BCFF (FPF-Jem)
11. BCFF (9th IceHawk)
12. F-BCFF (FPF-DrAzteca)
15. F-BCV (F14s) (Deadmansix)


Specialty ships:

1. F-CBF (1AF Capt Jeff)
2. F-CAD+R (KAT-Lyrkiller)
3. +PF Refits for Pookie's F-NCF
4. F-CLCF (Mantis)
5. F-CAD+R (FPF-TobinDax)
6. F-NCDR (KAT-Chutt)
7. F-CBF (FPF-Thrain)
8. F-CBF (SPACEDOCK)
9. F-CAD+R (ConfusedKitty)
10. F-CBF (Testy)


Transfers:

1. F-BCFF (From FPF-DrAzteca) FPF-Thrain
2. F-NHP (From KAT-Lyrkiller) to (Bearslayer)
3. F-CLCF (Hexx) Pookie
4. F-CLCF (Hexx's spare for when he got killed) SPACEDOCK
5. F-CBF (From FPF-DennyCrane) SPACEDOCK
6. F-CVDR (From Testy) SPACEDOCK

7. F-DNH (From Father Ted) FPF-Myriad
8. F-CVAR (From Frey) SPACEDOCK
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Hexx on November 25, 2004, 07:00:12 pm
Lost my DNH to Warsears & Mazeppa

The Exeter's reign of terror is over.

I had only been on the Dynaverse 30 minutes, and get in on a Big Battle.  Pookie was your wing?    GG, Bearslayer.  Oh, and Doomstone was a Major Theme in the battle.

HEY!!
YOU RETIRED!!!

NO BLOWIN UP OUR (well their technically I guess) STUFF!!


Glad you're back Maz.

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC on November 25, 2004, 07:00:30 pm
Glad to see you flying again Mazeppa  ;)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Doomstone on November 25, 2004, 07:01:09 pm
Bearslayer (F-DNH) and pookie (F-NCF) met Doomstone (K-C8VK IKV Clandestine Blaze), WarSears (K-FDW), and KBF-Mazeppa (K-G6) over the Romulan base in the 0 column.

It would be extremely funny to think Bearslayer fell to Mazeppa's G6. ;D

As the flatheads tried to run the border, War Sears made excellent use of his tractors and the DNH succumbed to the many drones from my ZYC fighters. Pookie escaped as the DNH exploded. All escape pods were terminated with extreme prejudice.  
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 25, 2004, 07:04:42 pm

C10K to WarSears


 ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KHH_Mrogue on November 25, 2004, 07:09:25 pm
GG Bearslayer, your right...   I tried getting a T-bomb between you my PFs and forgot you were coming up beside me...   LOL  Thanks for the game...   KHH_Mrogue
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 25, 2004, 07:18:30 pm
Kaz's DWD died.   GG  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 25, 2004, 07:22:16 pm
Un-assigned F-BCV has been Claimed (not assigned, but have you ever tried to say no to Kroma?) to Mistress_Kroma
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 25, 2004, 08:08:57 pm
Un-assigned F-BCV given to Mounty
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Mazeppa on November 25, 2004, 09:09:33 pm
FPF_Myriad's F-CBF goes down to my C7V.  GG Myriad!
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 25, 2004, 09:20:05 pm
Firehawk's sKRCSF goes down to Kroma's BCV CB #10
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: drb on November 25, 2004, 10:04:47 pm
Hoi Folks,

Duros took out pookie's NCFF.  :'(

GG

Take care

drb
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: madelf on November 25, 2004, 10:22:06 pm
Firehawk's SUK transferred to Dizzy
Firehawk to a KCRF
Sethan to a KHK

Ben NHKF
ShadowLord KDP
JadeFalcon KDP
Pardek NHKF

<Edit>
sigh, transfer Ben's NHKF to Reyam
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: WarSears on November 25, 2004, 11:05:36 pm
SSCF-Paladin goes down to a big mean rock good luck for me.  ;D <S> bud
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 25, 2004, 11:11:24 pm
F-CLCF from Dock is going to Pookie.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DrAzteca on November 26, 2004, 01:40:27 am
Dizzy's R-SUK SD before FPF-DrAzteca´s F-DNH destroy it.
GG


( It was not a fair match, I really hate the result, in any other circunstance I would tractor u to the border, U know it )

GG
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Dizzy on November 26, 2004, 02:52:19 am
The map... there was no border. I couldnt ever find one, no matter where I went. After those two really lucky alpha strikes... (yeah, lucky cuz I had a 1 and then a 2 shift and ur photons didnt miss which really, really really sucked...) I was kaput. No way I was gonna make it off... I mean, to where?

It was kinda a gg. I mean, there were a few interesting moves now and then, but honestly, I never thought those 2x alpha strikes would deal out such extensive damage. I mean... u really gutted my ship both times. I really thought the way I was landing plasma on you I'd give you a better fight than I did... but you had DH's luck tonight. He hardly ever misses with his photons... u both are bastards...
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DrAzteca on November 26, 2004, 03:34:27 am
both alpha strikes were with overloads ( first 6 overloads, then 12 phasers at range 7-8; 62 then 66 internals ). I was eating ur plasma with pleasure, all I need was a couple of shots  ;)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: deadmansix on November 26, 2004, 05:04:14 am

Lost my BCV to Dizzy in a hard fought match he flew well and with honor. just couldn't out run that last spread of Plasma.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Dizzy on November 26, 2004, 06:27:15 am
Yes, it was an historical fight. You proved to be a tough and worthy opponent. Full write up in (EDIT:) Romulan Peaceful Observatory Base about to fall to Federation Assault Force (RP)   (Narrative story.)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Capt_Bearslayer_XC on November 26, 2004, 03:31:24 pm
Mutt's C7 fell to the mighty PF's of the USS Cheese Burger (F-NHP)

Note:  Just figured out he was not supposed to have a C7...  ;D

RM's & Admin, handle it as you see fit.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 26, 2004, 05:27:53 pm
*sigh* No, he's NOT supposed to have a C-7. Mutt is a D2 n00b.
I will make sure he is aware of the assigned ships rules. ...Grrrr
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 26, 2004, 05:28:41 pm
*sigh* No, he's NOT supposed to have a C-7. Mutt is a D2 n00b.
I will make sure he is aware of the assigned ships rules. ...Grrrr

It is all good.   ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 26, 2004, 05:42:03 pm
F-CBF transefered from Spacedock to FPF-Thrain
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Sethan on November 26, 2004, 05:46:04 pm
Put the KHK RIS Honor's Guard in spacedock.

I got a huge load of work dumped on me last night, and have been up working on it since.  I have also been informed that I am going to be out of town for most of the weekend, so the earliest I will be able to fly again is Monday.  No sense in letting the ship sit idle in the mean time.

I just went up on the server and sold Honor's Guard back and bought a NHK - so the ship is ready for reassignment.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Green on November 26, 2004, 06:06:10 pm
*sigh* No, he's NOT supposed to have a C-7. Mutt is a D2 n00b.
I will make sure he is aware of the assigned ships rules. ...Grrrr

Don't be down on him bro.  Had a chance to talk to him on springer and he really didn't know.  No harm, no foul imo.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 26, 2004, 06:23:01 pm
SPACEDOCK CAD+R goes to ConfusedKitty
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 26, 2004, 06:44:38 pm
*sigh* No, he's NOT supposed to have a C-7. Mutt is a D2 n00b.
I will make sure he is aware of the assigned ships rules. ...Grrrr

Don't be down on him bro.  Had a chance to talk to him on springer and he really didn't know.  No harm, no foul imo.

Awww...I was so looking forward to trying out the newest model of my Agony Booth... :P
Thanks, Green.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Wanderer on November 26, 2004, 08:36:06 pm
Myriad is picking up the DNH in dock.
Thrain is picking up the BCFF in dock.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: 762_XC on November 26, 2004, 09:41:24 pm
*sigh* No, he's NOT supposed to have a C-7. Mutt is a D2 n00b.
I will make sure he is aware of the assigned ships rules. ...Grrrr

Don't be down on him bro.  Had a chance to talk to him on springer and he really didn't know.  No harm, no foul imo.

Awww...I was so looking forward to trying out the newest model of my Agony Booth... :P
Thanks, Green.

Don't let us take away from your recreation Krueg.  ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT Chuut-Ritt on November 26, 2004, 09:58:51 pm
*sigh* No, he's NOT supposed to have a C-7. Mutt is a D2 n00b.
I will make sure he is aware of the assigned ships rules. ...Grrrr

Don't be down on him bro.  Had a chance to talk to him on springer and he really didn't know.  No harm, no foul imo.

Awww...I was so looking forward to trying out the newest model of my Agony Booth... :P
Thanks, Green.

Ummm.... I think Nail would be the proper test subject for it after failing to stay on the map and finishing off an all but dead  Federation BCH....... :P

<Snicker>
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Wanderer on November 26, 2004, 10:43:46 pm
Indy Shark's FDW destroyed by Bearslayer's NHP.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT Chuut-Ritt on November 27, 2004, 12:21:58 am
Lears KDP was destroyed in an epic battle at 1, 4 by my NCDR
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFLordKrueg on November 27, 2004, 01:12:38 am
FDW in DryDock to KHH_Mrogue
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: madelf on November 27, 2004, 01:45:20 am
Lears KDP was destroyed in an epic battle at 1, 4 by my NCDR

Jade Falcon's KDP transferred to Lear.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: IAF Lyrkiller on November 27, 2004, 02:41:34 am
My CAD+R took out Mrogues K-DWD. (and i did save the film).
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT Chuut-Ritt on November 27, 2004, 05:04:24 am
The Evil One's R-KDP destroyed by me aka ButtheadtheFed in my F-NCDR.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: madelf on November 27, 2004, 06:56:28 am
Put the KHK RIS Honor's Guard in spacedock.

I got a huge load of work dumped on me last night, and have been up working on it since.  I have also been informed that I am going to be out of town for most of the weekend, so the earliest I will be able to fly again is Monday.  No sense in letting the ship sit idle in the mean time.

I just went up on the server and sold Honor's Guard back and bought a NHK - so the ship is ready for reassignment.

Transfer Sethan's KHK to Ben, assuming he gets his tail on the server.   ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT Chuut-Ritt on November 27, 2004, 07:56:24 am
Die Hard feel free to transfer my F-NCDR to another pilot for Saturday's finale as I wont be on again due to work till 11PM EST at earliest, but I'll be on as soon as I get home and check here to see if you reassigned.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Capt_Bearslayer_XC on November 27, 2004, 08:48:56 am
Just wanted to let everyone know the past week I have been playing mostly from a dial up connection since I am house sitting.

That is why I have others with better connections posting my kills for me.


Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Dizzy on November 27, 2004, 10:12:05 am


That is why I have others with better connections posting my kills for me.




You killed something? :P
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: madelf on November 27, 2004, 02:20:36 pm


That is why I have others with better connections posting my kills for me.




You killed something? :P

I wonder if the loss of a ship, or having the whole community know you were killed by Bearslayer, is worse?
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Capt_Bearslayer_XC on November 27, 2004, 03:45:37 pm


That is why I have others with better connections posting my kills for me.




You killed something? :P

Apparently, I killed nothing of note...  ;)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 27, 2004, 04:23:49 pm
I took no joy in killing Rock's K-D5D.

(J'inn made me do it)
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: WarSears on November 27, 2004, 06:57:54 pm
I took no joy in killing Rock's K-D5D.

(J'inn made me do it)

That BASTARD Jinn
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 27, 2004, 08:35:07 pm
t00l is getting assinged the last CVAR from Spacedock.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 27, 2004, 09:01:11 pm
<faints>

UGH

Updated.

Sorry Wanderer but I got so confused that I did it from scratch so it doesn't look so purty.

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KBFKrotz on November 27, 2004, 09:16:23 pm
<faints>

UGH

Updated.

Sorry Wanderer but I got so confused that I did it from scratch so it doesn't look so purty.



Hmmm, you missed my FDW from last Sat....
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Jem on November 27, 2004, 11:07:51 pm
Kytarh's CV8K fell to me and Green
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 27, 2004, 11:08:45 pm
KBF-Soth's R-KHK Fell to Davey and Ryker
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Firehawk on November 27, 2004, 11:11:27 pm
Testy's F-sCBF fell to the R-KCRF Divine Wind
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-DieHard on November 27, 2004, 11:12:02 pm
Firehawk's R-KCRS died versus J'inn and t00L
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 27, 2004, 11:12:23 pm
Good Game everyone!!

I'll wait for the final kill reports for a while and then post the scores
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Firehawk on November 27, 2004, 11:13:06 pm
Firehawk's R-KCRS died versus J'inn and t00L

It was a KCRF
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Capt_Bearslayer_XC on November 27, 2004, 11:14:05 pm
Even better
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: 762_XC on November 27, 2004, 11:15:24 pm
F9th-Komodo (F-CLC)
J'inn (F-HDWsomethinorother)
t00l (F-CVAR)

-vs-

Firehawk (R-KCRF)
TacoBell (R-KRCS)

Both Rommies (and the CLC) killed, gg!

2 points for da freakin good guys.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Villa64 on November 27, 2004, 11:16:40 pm
Glad you got that SOB.  My crew is floating around the nebula. <sniff>

 :D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on November 27, 2004, 11:17:10 pm
Doomstone's C8VK fell to Kroma and Green's BCVs. VVVVGG game Doomstone. You got balls. Damn that's what keeps me coming back, win or lose.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Firehawk on November 27, 2004, 11:20:07 pm
Glad you got that SOB.  My crew is floating around the nebula. <sniff>

 :D

Teach you to mess with a romulan in a nebula  ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Doomstone on November 27, 2004, 11:28:15 pm
Doomstone's C8VK fell to Kroma and Green's BCVs. VVVVGG game Doomstone. You got balls. Damn that's what keeps me coming back, win or lose.

Right on. The first ship I lost on the whole server was in the last mission... and I didn't think it would count because everyone on voice chat was screaming about the server being over!!! I still almost made it... took 2 BCV's to take me down. GG guys!
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Green on November 27, 2004, 11:41:13 pm
Doomstone's C8VK fell to Kroma and Green's BCVs. VVVVGG game Doomstone. You got balls. Damn that's what keeps me coming back, win or lose.

Right on. The first ship I lost on the whole server was in the last mission... and I didn't think it would count because everyone on voice chat was screaming about the server being over!!! I still almost made it... took 2 BCV's to take me down. GG guys!


GG Doomstone.

Only because "he who shall not be named ... but is still a bastich ... J'inn" says I have to, I'll also post that KYTARAH lost his DN in a battle that he was outnumbered 2v1 against Jem and I.

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on November 28, 2004, 12:03:16 am
FINAL UPDATE DONE!!!

I may have made some boo boos so double check me.


And  . . . .


The Alliance wins in a squeaker!!!!!!

See first post for details.

Man, that was ugly.   Good thing old J'inn invested heavily in the Deep Space Coffin Company, Inc.   Who sez war isn't profitable?

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Villa64 on November 28, 2004, 12:39:10 am
OPERATION MOSQUITO MAKES THE DIFFERENCE!

from CNN.com

Babel>  In the final round of negotiations here, Federation diplomats are pointing to advantages gained during the now revealed "Operation Mosquito".  One diplomat was quoted as saying, " Its as if we were down to the wire at the cease fire, and the edge we needed to gain peace was percieved "points" gained in the Tholian Theater of Operations (TTO)".  In a secret operation, now revealed to CNN reporters, Operation Mosquito was launched from Tholian space to gain advantages from a stretched thin Klingon fleet.  "The Klingons are not sleeping soundly tonight, knowing that Romulan warships patrol its shipping lanes", one negotiator said.

The fight edged back and forth, especially in the past few days.  Negotiators, speaking on the condition of anonymity, pointed to perceived 'points' that negotiators used during negotiations.  Four such points made the difference.  The days were dark over the Thanksgiving Holiday, but Starfleet ships were there, defending freedom, despite pushes by the heathens when they knew that we were chowing on turkey.  Despite the controversy over the meal at DS2 ('the chow here sucks, troops say'), Starfleet fought on, knowing they were supported by their brothers down south.

Tholian ambassador (name cannot be pronounced by humans), said that their fleet 'enjoyed making big Klink rocks into little Klink rocks.'  When asked about the rumor of Federation captains providing assistance, Ambassador N.C.B.P.B.H. replied, 'no comment'.

The campaign has been marred, however.  Admission of a Federation admirals 'apology for being a pr#ck', and subspace pleas regarding 'needing numbers', and west 'crumbling', were dismissed by Federation authorities as <transmission garbled>.

Authorities do point to the near future.  "The Roms are stretched thin now.  With the necessity of peacekeeping in the Klingon Home Sector, and losses taken during GW4, we see the possbility of a breakthrough soon.  And I aint selling you lizard oil", one diplomat said.



------------------------------

...Do you want to know more?  Become a CNN member by clicking here
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FireSoul on November 28, 2004, 02:38:55 am
Well, if anything is to be said about the final score, it's that the coalition certainly did far better than expected. We felt overwhelmed, guys, and I'm sure many alliance pilots didn't know that. Many continuous days and nights were hard fought just to maintain what we had in hopes that we could improve our numbers, and that actually eventually came!
Example: Thanksgiving day: blue! (http://home.satx.rr.com/arachne/Holy_Blue_Balls_Batman!.gif)

Overview:
Most of the campaign has been fought defensively by the coalition, after the initial opening weekend where the 'bridge' was established. The losses of  0,4 , 2,5 ,  4,7 , 5,8  were only mitigated through the placement of bases and battlestations in the hopes to slow down the advanced. 3,8(FireSoul) was placed first *right at the front* and it semi-miraculously created the wanted and needed trench warfare necessary to slow down the advance of the alliance multitude.

BS 0,9(Pardek) and the BATS of 4,10(Doomstone) were later on placed as further protective locations, covering the valuable Klingon inner planets and starbases. Thanks to these additional bases, we held. Just look at the link above for proof. Placing the BATS actually had the side effect of increasing the max DV of the hex to 20, unlike placing a BS which had no effect!. That worked out for us.

0,6?(Pardek) and 1,7(Warsears) were placed later during the great charge to 0,4, as resupply and reinforcement jumppoints for both Romulan and Klingon pilots. It worked out extremely well as 0,4 was retaken as Klingon, and it was close to the last evening's 2,2 arena. It also served as a resupply point in the retaking of 2,5 overnight.

While 2,5 was being contested during that same night, the alliance proceeded down the 27 and 29 column relatively unchallenged, taking 2 Romulan bases as well as retaking what was previously theirs at 28,6..  BS 27,11 (MadElf) was placed at around 8am EST on the last day, before retiring to bed, as a simple insurance that "it'll slow them down if they continue". By the time that I, myself, came back on at around 1pm, the coalition numbers were actually good and that territory was being retaken starting with the 27,9 base as Klingon. Another Romulan base was placed in 28,7 (FireSoul) column right at that front to ease in mission times and prevent possible numbers turn around. The end result was that front was retaken too and that base didn't do all that much.. but it was a thought.


Analysis:
This campaign was very hard and well fought.. and to be honest the coalition is calling this final result a resounding success considering how the campaign went. Kudos to all!! it was hell.
It's my personal opinion that the bases actually performed as desired, and allowed the final recovery of the coalition. Those bases didn't win the server, but they sure prevented the loss. *7* coalition bases were placed at the cost of 75K PP for BSs and 135K PP for BATSes. I mean, wow. Really.


EDIT: Please let me know if I missed ANY of the bases placed.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT Chuut-Ritt on November 28, 2004, 04:21:56 am
And Kudos to the Alliance pilots as well for overcoming the weekend Red and Green Plagues to earn a humble victory.  Things often looked Grim as a few dedicated pilots would stand in the face of overwhelming odds.  Same could be said for several Coalition pilots who did the same on those occasions when the situation was reversed.

I would especially like to commend one Coalition player for this as he was often faced with superior odds in the early morning hours but strived to be as much of a pain as he could and do what he could for his cause.  So everyone congratulate Reejr, he symbolised what this game is about.  Never did he complain about being outnumbered but strove to do his best and always provided great matches and utmost sportsmanship. 

This server was a blast and the level of sportsmanship is far superior to that of ANY other server it has been my pleasure to be involved in, I think we can all pat ourselves on the back.  Well done all!!!

However, rather than let the admins get a big head about their tremendous success I propose that we need to form a new "Bitching Committee" to bring us up to our normal par and give J'inn and Co. their normal levels of stress.  I think Dizzy should lead this group as his particular talents would be put to maximun effect.  After all when you need a bitch who else are you gonna call........ ;D
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-Wanderer on November 28, 2004, 06:35:02 am
Wow, what a campaign!  Hard fought, well played, ultimately the numbers were fairly even (I'd be willing to bet w/ a statistical analysis, missions flown would be within +/- 5-10%), and the best part of all was that GW4 was as civilized a server as I have ever been a part of.  Kudos to all.

Overview:

The initial day and a half of the server was a bit of a blow to Alliance morale, as the Coalition ran unopposed across the southern part of the map to create their "bridge" and separate Federation and Tholian territory.  An unfortunate side effect of this was that the starting postion for Feds was at the very bottom of Fed space and once the bridge was in place, new Feds joining the server found themselves deep in enemy territory (J'inn you bastard! lol).

Things turned for us starting late the first Sunday night when we finally got some numbers on (the Coalition must have been watching the football game on ESPN, or "Touched by an Angel", not sure which) and we took the first Klingon base.  The next two nights were also good to us, and we managed to continue south and capture two more bases.

From there, things devolved into a stalemate of trench warfare.  Yes, the bases that were placed in the area (3,8 and 4,10 which changed hands more times than I can count, lol) by the Coalition did slow us down a bit, but the 40 dv hexes directly behind them is what truly stopped any further Alliance gains.  We never did have the numbers to push forward any further, and when we did manage to take one of those high dv hexes on the overnight, the Coalition numbers advantage during the morning took it right back (although this had the advantage of keeping the Coalition forces occupied and from hitting elsewhere).

The rest of the server was pretty much the Coalition re-taking the 3,8 area during their high times and the Alliance taking them back during theirs.  We made a few valiant attempts to break the "bridge" over Tholian space, but never could sustain it for more than an evening before it was taken back the next morning. 

Analysis:

It's a funny thing about "the numbers".  I'll bet each side has just as many "We're horribly outnumbered!" threads as the other in their respective forums.

Alliance high times were Sunday thru Tuesday and the overnight shift.  Coalition superiority was on Fridays and Saturdays and the mornings/afternoons (other than Thanksgiving morning, heheh).  The rest of the week during primetime the numbers were relatively even.  As I said above, I'd put money on the number of missions run at pretty darn even.  Heck, just looking at the starting and ending maps attests to the eveness of the server.

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KDS-KYTARH on November 28, 2004, 10:08:57 am
15 minutes left to go on the server, Captain Kytarh on the bridge of the D'Ktagh for his 13th hour of battle on the final day. Working to flip a base on the eastern front to try and grant some relief to the warriors battling on the north west corner. Suddenly we are jumped by two Fed BCFFs or something. Green and Jem are attacking my flagship! I try to put up a fight and in a last minute try to ward at least one ship off run to get them in behind me. I start to launch my fighters intending to at least cause some damage before I leave the map. For some reason two of my fighter wings wont leave the bay,, I take a few seconds to look down and see what the problem is and when I look back up I am tractored! The Flagship D'Ktagh, Long a thorn in the side of the Federation was finally destroyed at the border. Good game Green and Jem.
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Vorcha on November 28, 2004, 03:44:55 pm
Sounded like fun...sorry I was away and couldn't be there.  GW5 will be different.

V
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: FPF-SCM_TraceyG_XC on November 28, 2004, 10:12:04 pm
Unstickied
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Dizzy on November 28, 2004, 11:57:35 pm
After all when you need a bitch who else are you gonna call........ ;D
Chuut-Busters!
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT Chuut-Ritt on November 29, 2004, 12:46:34 am
After all when you need a bitch who else are you gonna call........ ;D
Chuut-Busters!


LMAO good one Dizzy,

and here is our business card

(http://www.boomspeed.com/chuutritt/mercy.JPG)

<Snicker>
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: KAT J'inn on March 01, 2005, 03:11:42 pm
Bump for diabolical reasons.

Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Father Ted on March 01, 2005, 04:11:24 pm
Isn't GW4 like, over?

I've already got my lizard boots ready for GW5. My yeowoman is modeling a slinky gown covered with scales. What's the holdup on GW5?!  :carmen:
Title: Re: GW 4 - DAY OF THE EAGLE - OFFICIAL GAME PLAY THREAD
Post by: Kroma BaSyl on March 01, 2005, 04:14:44 pm
Isn't GW4 like, over?

I've already got my lizard boots ready for GW5. My yeowoman is modeling a slinky gown covered with scales. What's the holdup on GW5?!  :carmen:

J'inn is still waiting for all the checks to clear. <snicker>