Dynaverse.net
Taldrenites => Starfleet Command Models => Final Products => Topic started by: GotAFarmYet? on June 07, 2005, 01:47:49 am
-
Hello well here are the new ships at BattleClinic that got finished.
Thanks to MP for the Claymore Class write up.
Claymore Class (http://www.battleclinic.com/docks/dock.php?id=2524)
Ascension Class (http://www.battleclinic.com/docks/dock.php?id=2525)
Belknap Class Mk I & II (http://www.battleclinic.com/docks/dock.php?id=2526)
Belisarius Class (http://www.battleclinic.com/docks/dock.php?id=2527)
Excelsior Class Carrier (http://www.battleclinic.com/docks/dock.php?id=2528)
-
Texturing is great on all of them, as per your usual work G.A.F.Y. I especially like the Belknap design. Thanks for all of these. 8) :thumbsup:
-
Oh yeah!
-
i know its ben a year but i was wondring of the belknap and acsention was your creation?,cause i made kitbash and change the texture of some of the model and if its your stuff if its ok for me to post them at the battleclinic?
-
The model parts were made by P81
The Kitbashes were made by Atrahasis
The Textures are mine though
P81 doesn't care about this older stuff anymore, Atrahasis needs to be asked about changes made to his work. I don't care about usage of textures or mods to them, because I rather have ships produced and released then ppl try to find me.
-
ok, i will try another email of Atra and see if i got a respond.
-
Wow, hey, look, it's my old Claymore! Cool.
-
that version got ported to BC.
-
Wow, hey, look, it's my old Claymore! Cool.
Most if not all your models were quite cool!
-
Some really nice ships here. I've always liked the Belknap class, though I don't see the logic in calling her a "strike cruiser" when she has less firepower than the refitted Enterprise...
I have a command ship version of the Claymore that goes by the name Churchill. It's a pretty decent design, but for some reason I'm just not keen on it. Drives me nuts trying to figure out why when I think about it.
I've got that Excelsior-style Fleet carrier, but the one I have is not labelled as the John Paul Jones (who was an ex-pat Scot who hated the English)... its the George W. Bush.
;D
-
I have a command ship version of the Claymore that goes by the name Churchill. It's a pretty decent design, but for some reason I'm just not keen on it. Drives me nuts trying to figure out why when I think about it.
Probably the large swaths of undetailed hull. I really should have put more time into her.
-
If it was this version of the Churchill...
I can tell you why it drives me crazy, the LOD uses a different model and it uses a older set of textures that don't match. I was running out of time and never completed the LOD textures.
As for the John Pual Jones that was one I did, which I did like 3 versions of, but I think they all used the same name.
Redid the Claymore as well and it covered a bit more with details.
(pics of the churchill follow)
-
God, makes me wish I could get back into modelling :/
-
God, makes me wish I could get back into modelling :/
Ya should :)
-
I would, but I don't have any functional copies of the game(s) anymore... :/
-
I would, but I don't have any functional copies of the game(s) anymore... :/
Thats no excuse. ;D
-
I would, but I don't have any functional copies of the game(s) anymore... :/
Thats no excuse. ;D
Agreed. If ya love making the models then go for it ;). You can always eventually get another set of games.
-
Older topic, but Sbloyd... I regularly make and fly my stuff in the demos... don't think that I've played more than "Repair Rendevous" in the SFC 1 demo or the initial demo from SFC 2 demo in almost four years. ;)
I have SFC 3 here and am planning to reinstall it soon so I can finally play "Generations at War" and see how my stuff looks going head to head against things. :D
But for playtesting, I use the demos, and that works fine for me.. :)