Dynaverse.net
Taldrenites => Dynaverse II Experiences => Topic started by: Hexx on October 27, 2005, 06:27:51 pm
-
So I was flipping through Module K, wondering if the Klinks could use
PF's to fight the Fed super fighters, when I cam across the description of the G1K
- "variant designed to hunt fighters"
Great! Thinks I, eagerly flpping to the page in the SSD book to see what they're like..
They're the same thing as a normal G1.. is my SSD book broken?
Am I missing something?
Why are they variants if they're the same ship?
-
The G1Ks had drone rack that could fire a crap-load of dogfight drones.
-
Hmmm... K-G1Km?
-
Hmmm... K-G1Km?
.....
Well that's better than my thought of extra AMD , but I don't think the Alliance would like it..
:P
-
Both ideas are crazy.
G1's are pretty damn good at killing fighters now. Not everyone gets AMD on a PF.
-
Soooo you're not really open to the idea of adding AMD to
certain races PF's then eh?
-
I am not for overproliferation of free extra point defense, no. It changes too many things. Drones become useless. Carriers become useless.
-
I am not for overproliferation of free extra point defense, no. It changes too many things. Drones become useless. Carriers become useless.
<CHEAP SHOT> Then you must also be against half the Fed shiplist. :P
-
If you mean double duty G-racks, then pretty much, yes.
-
I assume there would likely be some weird UI issues, but since fighters can use ship weapons, can ships use fighter weapons? The fighter type-I drone isn't a perfect match for dogfight drones, but it seems as close as we'll ever get to mounting E-racks on anything...adding ADD gives G1Ks WAY more drone defense than is reasonable, MIRVs are a better idea, but would have too many reloads if two were used, going to one drops too much firepower. If the fighter drones could be done, I'd say try those.