Dynaverse.net

Taldrenites => Starfleet Command Models => Topic started by: Atolm-Rising on June 14, 2007, 04:39:22 pm

Title: For when Logic does not Prevail...
Post by: Atolm-Rising on June 14, 2007, 04:39:22 pm
Sotek:
(http://drs.battleclinic.com/atolm/atolm_vulcan_ca1.jpg)
(http://drs.battleclinic.com/atolm/atolm_vulcan_ca2.jpg)
(http://drs.battleclinic.com/atolm/atolm_vulcan_ca3.jpg)
(http://drs.battleclinic.com/atolm/atolm_vulcan_ca4.jpg)

Special thanks for the Deadman for the renders
Title: Re: For when Logic does not Prevail...
Post by: F9th0mega on June 14, 2007, 08:48:25 pm
sh*t man, that is NICE looking :D ya crazy son of a :D
Title: Re: For when Logic does not Prevail...
Post by: Norsehound on June 14, 2007, 09:02:38 pm
*arches eyebrow* Facinating.

I thought it might be an Andorian ship with a vulcan ring, but the other views dissolved this presumption.

It's also interesting how you moved the propultion ring forward. It's a nice allusion to the Warbird, which also has the warp pylons mounted ahead of the hull's midsection.

now maybe if it had the old grey/green rommie paintjob it would atleast stand out a bit more.

I think, as a romulan ship, it stands out plenty that it's stylized ENT vulcan. Making it "Enemy Green" like just about every other non-fed ship in TNG would take away from that.

Also, the design is certainly bulkier than romulan ships of the peiod- again alluding to TOS romulan designs in that they weren't as angular as ENT Vulcans.
Title: Re: For when Logic does not Prevail...
Post by: Adonis on June 15, 2007, 12:52:51 am
Now, this I do like :)
Title: Re: For when Logic does not Prevail...
Post by: Atolm-Rising on June 15, 2007, 01:25:33 pm
Tus hooked me Up with this sweet Render :)
(http://aycu12.webshots.com/image/18051/2002596181947213248_rs.jpg)
Title: Re: For when Logic does not Prevail...
Post by: Norsehound on June 16, 2007, 02:26:47 am
Hmm, well the ship in 'enemy green' might not look so bad... any more on that Romulan bird up top?
Title: Re: For when Logic does not Prevail...
Post by: Tus-XC on June 16, 2007, 08:11:35 am
(http://outalance.battleclinic.com/tus/images/tvorax1.jpg) (http://outalance.battleclinic.com/tus/images2/vorax1.jpg)(http://outalance.battleclinic.com/tus/images/tvorax2.jpg) (http://outalance.battleclinic.com/tus/images2/vorax2.jpg)(http://outalance.battleclinic.com/tus/images/tvorax3.jpg) (http://outalance.battleclinic.com/tus/images2/vorax3.jpg)
Title: Re: For when Logic does not Prevail...
Post by: Shadowfleet on June 16, 2007, 09:47:51 pm
Nice, I like both ships. Will they be for SFC 3?
Title: Re: For when Logic does not Prevail...
Post by: Terradyhne on June 17, 2007, 04:58:11 am
both ships look good, i only don't like the warps on the romulan, they look a bit out of place for an standard romulan design, maybe im to traditional  ::)
Title: Re: For when Logic does not Prevail...
Post by: Atolm-Rising on June 17, 2007, 04:30:09 pm
both ships look good, i only don't like the warps on the romulan, they look a bit out of place for an standard romulan design, maybe im to traditional  ::)
not much I can do about that ::)
Title: Re: For when Logic does not Prevail...
Post by: Tus-XC on June 18, 2007, 07:00:23 pm
Sotek:  http://www.battleclinic.com/docks/dock.php?id=4399
Vorax:  http://www.battleclinic.com/docks/dock.php?id=4400
Title: Re: For when Logic does not Prevail...
Post by: Raven Night on June 21, 2007, 09:00:53 pm
Outstanding work on both I think. Not a suprise of course.

I like the more traditional layout made famous by Enterprise, I think it works on this model in my opinion, and I like the Romulan slant. Has a kind of TMP feel to it.

Excellent job.