Dynaverse.net

Taldrenites => Starfleet Command Models => Topic started by: Mackie on August 05, 2007, 12:00:22 pm

Title: Viipuri class (boredom bash thread)
Post by: Mackie on August 05, 2007, 12:00:22 pm
LWO: http://outalance.battleclinic.com/darkcentral/dldir/pafiledb.php?action=file&id=%20241
(http://outalance.battleclinic.com/darkcentral/ships/images/viipuri.jpg)
credits: p81, gafy
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: ModelsPlease on August 05, 2007, 01:26:50 pm
since mp has been takin mah jerb recently i thought i'd do something too for once :P
is this worth anyones attention?

([url]http://www.the-tcs.net/miscos/unna.jpg[/url])


LOL I'm stilla waiting on that Oberth/Excel bash you were woring on. This looks like a TMP Charleston without a true sec hull. Which BTW I did one of  :P But I can't fill your shoes dude you're far better at bashing then I am.  :notworthy:
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: Mackie on August 05, 2007, 03:00:27 pm
since mp has been takin mah jerb recently i thought i'd do something too for once :P
is this worth anyones attention?

([url]http://www.the-tcs.net/miscos/unna.jpg[/url])


LOL I'm stilla waiting on that Oberth/Excel bash you were woring on. This looks like a TMP Charleston without a true sec hull. Which BTW I did one of  :P But I can't fill your shoes dude you're far better at bashing then I am.  :notworthy:


I cant find that bash from anywhere :<
as for the charleston thing,  i had a nagging feeling that I was doing something that someone had already done before but i ignored that, I just wanted to do something with flimsy zigzag pylons, didnt intent to redo the charleston.... oh pooh. ;/
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: ModelsPlease on August 05, 2007, 03:45:47 pm
Quote
I just wanted to do something with flimsy zigzag pylons, didnt intent to redo the charleston.... oh pooh. ;/


Well heck we don't wanna waste flimsy zigzag pylons SOoooooo why not do this one?
http://www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images/federation/heavycruiser_kongo2.jpg
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: FoaS_XC on August 05, 2007, 04:33:33 pm
Hoooow about both?
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: Mackie on August 05, 2007, 04:52:31 pm
Quote
I just wanted to do something with flimsy zigzag pylons, didnt intent to redo the charleston.... oh pooh. ;/


Well heck we don't wanna waste flimsy zigzag pylons SOoooooo why not do this one?
[url]http://www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images/federation/heavycruiser_kongo2.jpg[/url]

-Because that ship looks hella stupid, no offence intented but tahts just my opinion  ;/
Its just your normal connie with different pylons :<
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: Starforce2 on August 05, 2007, 06:53:22 pm
since mp has been takin mah jerb recently i thought i'd do something too for once :P
is this worth anyones attention?

([url]http://www.the-tcs.net/miscos/unna.jpg[/url])


Nice, I like it. Corsair wings are a nice touch too.
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: ModelsPlease on August 05, 2007, 08:07:14 pm
Quote
I just wanted to do something with flimsy zigzag pylons, didnt intent to redo the charleston.... oh pooh. ;/


Well heck we don't wanna waste flimsy zigzag pylons SOoooooo why not do this one?
[url]http://www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images/federation/heavycruiser_kongo2.jpg[/url]

-Because that ship looks hella stupid, no offence intented but tahts just my opinion  ;/
Its just your normal connie with different pylons :<


Ok well then how about this?
http://www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images/federation/corvette_balclutha.jpg
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: Smiley on August 05, 2007, 08:16:58 pm
Lol, but that's just a secondary hull with crazy zig-zag pylons :-/
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: Anthony Scott on August 05, 2007, 11:50:59 pm
For the firs time in a very long time finally a Fed I like!

Looks really good Mackie, when will you release it?

Semper Fi, Carry On
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: Bernard Guignard on August 06, 2007, 05:31:16 am
Nice work Mackie  ;D
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: Mackie on August 06, 2007, 02:06:12 pm
Quote
I just wanted to do something with flimsy zigzag pylons, didnt intent to redo the charleston.... oh pooh. ;/


Well heck we don't wanna waste flimsy zigzag pylons SOoooooo why not do this one?
[url]http://www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images/federation/heavycruiser_kongo2.jpg[/url]

-Because that ship looks hella stupid, no offence intented but tahts just my opinion  ;/
Its just your normal connie with different pylons :<


Ok well then how about this?

would be pretty easy to do something to the effect :>
[url]http://www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images/federation/corvette_balclutha.jpg[/url]
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: Mackie on August 06, 2007, 02:08:00 pm
For the firs time in a very long time finally a Fed I like!

Looks really good Mackie, when will you release it?

Semper Fi, Carry On
As soon as I put it in a zip package and make a better render to go with the ship :P
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: Starforce2 on August 06, 2007, 04:58:58 pm
Quote
I just wanted to do something with flimsy zigzag pylons, didnt intent to redo the charleston.... oh pooh. ;/


Well heck we don't wanna waste flimsy zigzag pylons SOoooooo why not do this one?
[url]http://www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images/federation/heavycruiser_kongo2.jpg[/url]

-Because that ship looks hella stupid, no offence intented but tahts just my opinion  ;/
Its just your normal connie with different pylons :<


Ok well then how about this?
[url]http://www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images/federation/corvette_balclutha.jpg[/url]


I thought someone already did that recently?
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: ModelsPlease on August 06, 2007, 06:08:52 pm
Quote
I just wanted to do something with flimsy zigzag pylons, didnt intent to redo the charleston.... oh pooh. ;/


Well heck we don't wanna waste flimsy zigzag pylons SOoooooo why not do this one?
[url]http://www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images/federation/heavycruiser_kongo2.jpg[/url]

-Because that ship looks hella stupid, no offence intented but tahts just my opinion  ;/
Its just your normal connie with different pylons :<


Ok well then how about this?
[url]http://www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images/federation/corvette_balclutha.jpg[/url]


I thought someone already did that recently?


Not that I know of
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: Starforce2 on August 07, 2007, 01:30:19 am
speaking of the charelston, is anyone doing a highres/poly remake?
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: Terradyhne on August 07, 2007, 02:01:43 am
Mackie the overall model looks good and is a good bash but i think the secondary hull is to smal
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: OlBuzzard on August 07, 2007, 07:28:07 am
yeah ..   I kinda agree.  Aside from that it is an interesting concept !
Title: Re: boredom bash thread number #5890312832189 i have no idea rly
Post by: ModelsPlease on August 07, 2007, 10:15:45 am
speaking of the charelston, is anyone doing a highres/poly remake?

Nobody has, to my knowledge. I as ya can see was experimenting with one but mine came out looking more like a late TMP/Lost era version  :-\
Title: Re: Viipuri class (boredom bash thread)
Post by: KOTH-KieranXC, Ret. on August 08, 2007, 10:42:45 am
Quote
I just wanted to do something with flimsy zigzag pylons, didnt intent to redo the charleston.... oh pooh. ;/


Well heck we don't wanna waste flimsy zigzag pylons SOoooooo why not do this one?
[url]http://www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images/federation/heavycruiser_kongo2.jpg[/url]

-Because that ship looks hella stupid, no offence intented but tahts just my opinion  ;/
Its just your normal connie with different pylons :<


Ok well then how about this?
[url]http://www.shipschematics.net/startrek/images/federation/corvette_balclutha.jpg[/url]


Dude... most of the designs on shipschematics are utter crap. The ones that aren't terribly done kitbashes can all be found somewhere else.
Title: Re: Viipuri class (boredom bash thread)
Post by: Starforce2 on August 09, 2007, 10:27:54 am
here's the mod file (you'll hafta reselect the lightmaps in material editor, but that's easy)
Title: Re: Viipuri class (boredom bash thread)
Post by: ModelsPlease on August 09, 2007, 10:54:08 am
Hey Mackie quick thought, since you added impulse engines to the "pod" why not remove them from the saucer and utilize that area for a shuttle bay?
Title: Re: Viipuri class (boredom bash thread)
Post by: Starforce2 on August 09, 2007, 11:43:11 am
be better to use the pod for shuttles or the thrust would rip it off.
Title: Re: Viipuri class (boredom bash thread)
Post by: Mackie on August 09, 2007, 04:07:54 pm
too late, its out now as it is :/ :-\
Title: Re: Viipuri class (boredom bash thread)
Post by: Starforce2 on August 09, 2007, 04:34:49 pm
oh well, I like it the way it is...4 impulse means extra acceleration.
Title: Re: Viipuri class (boredom bash thread)
Post by: Mackie on August 10, 2007, 05:00:21 am
oh well, I like it the way it is...4 impulse means extra acceleration.
Whenever I think of impulse engines, acceleration and such... for some reason propellers come into mind, propulsion.
with having 2 impulse engines you can run them at 50% each to gain the same 100% as you would with one impulse engine (yes, i know 50% from 2 sources isnt exactly the _same_  as 100% as from one, 100% from two sources would mean running both at 100% efficiency but you know what i mean), now which one sounds more sound for structural integrity? you know, equal 50% thrust from 2 points offers a steadier ride than 100% from one :P
Title: Re: Viipuri class (boredom bash thread)
Post by: OlBuzzard on August 10, 2007, 09:54:12 am
YUP! you are right on Mackie !

AND if placed correctly  ...   that would also translate into better maneuverability as well !
Title: Re: Viipuri class (boredom bash thread)
Post by: Mackie on August 10, 2007, 10:35:56 am
YUP! you are right on Mackie !

AND if placed correctly  ...   that would also translate into better maneuverability as well !

Thought so ;D
or 70% thrust on top and 30% on the pod, if people still think the deflector pod would get torn off... or the other way around, because then the top would "pull its own weight" more effectively and not have the pod support the whole structure :P