Poll

Is going with SFB limits on fighters & PF's OK with strict Carrier OOB

Yes
8 (66.7%)
No
3 (25%)
Only for Fighters
1 (8.3%)
Only for PF's
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 12

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All

Topic: Fighter & PF's  (Read 3432 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline KAT Chuut-Ritt

  • Vice Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 26161
  • Gender: Male
Re: Fighter & PF's
« Reply #20 on: November 01, 2005, 03:33:44 am »
Quote from: 762_XC on October 31, 2005, 01:00:32 pm
I'll agree to zero deck crews when we have human-controlled fighters.

Well we already have fighter-controlled players  :P

<Snicker>
Logged

Offline FPF-Paladin

  • 'Thou shalt not CAD.' - DH
  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 588
  • Gender: Male
Re: Fighter & PF's
« Reply #21 on: November 01, 2005, 07:38:39 am »
I'm all for any idea that cuts back on the "Whoo, fighters are out... don't need CCs' any more do we..." syndrome that usually sweeps over players around mid-late...

I'm not against fighters and pfs exactly, just unhappy that beyond a certain point we're not playing Star Trek, it's the battle of Midway sometimes that's all.
Logged
~Life cannot find reasons to sustain it, cannot be a source of decent mutual regard, unless each of us resolves to breathe such qualities into it. ~

Offline Dizzy

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6179
Re: Fighter & PF's
« Reply #22 on: November 01, 2005, 07:43:48 am »
It's the battle of the CS+  ;D
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All
« previous next »