Topic: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers  (Read 7169 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

James Formo

  • Guest
OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« on: September 22, 2003, 01:50:55 pm »


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

But if more scratch modelers would listen up and pay attention to what people are requesting atleast 50% of the time there'd be less whiners. So many modlers do only what they want instead of what is actualy needed or wanted by the people that when even an amature quality model of some rare ship comes out, it blows you big boys off the charts. Think about it.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



That is a quote from STarforce2 at SFC3 files. Apparently us modelers are not listening to requests and are doing are own thing. What audacity we have, not being paid, but doing this as a hobby for free and were doing ships we want to do instead of the Ships SF2 needs. Also interesting comment from someone I never seen request a ship, only insist that items on it be added or changed to his liking.

In fact I have not seen a ship request in these forums for ages. So where are these people and there requests?

Oh Starforce congrats on finnaly figuring out how to spell my name.

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2003, 01:59:18 pm »
Hello James,

Well,

   starforce2 is only showing his complete and utter ignorance once again,
I always believed starforce2 was an ignorant pee-wit,

but this really "takes the cake"


Quote:



Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

   But if more scratch modelers would listen up and pay attention to what people are requesting atleast 50% of the time there'd be less whiners. So many modlers do only what they want instead of what is actualy needed or wanted by the people that when even an amature quality model of some rare ship comes out, it blows you big boys off the charts. Think about it.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



That is a quote from STarforce2 at SFC3 files. Apparently us modelers are not listening to requests and are doing are own thing. What audacity we have, not being paid, but doing this as a hobby for free and were doing ships we want to do instead of the Ships SF2 needs. Also interesting comment from someone I never seen request a ship, only insist that items on it be added or changed to his liking.

In fact I have not seen a ship request in these forums for ages. So where are these people and there requests?

Oh Starforce congrats on finnaly figuring out how to spell my name.  





starforce2,
you are such a dim ignorant fool,
that I'm probably wasting my breath,
but perhaps this might penatrate even your thick skull,
that is if there is anything inside it,

starforce2,

All 3d modders do this for free,
We are not payed,
We do it for free,

Next,
it is up to the 3d modder to make what they want,
"its their baby",

If that has not pentrated your skull yet,
please go play "marbles on the Freeway",

Ahem,
"at rush-hour",

Ahem,
Please ...


GeneralWolfe
 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by GeneralWolfe »

DestinyCalling

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2003, 02:01:49 pm »
er... I thought that was kinda the point...A hobby..!!  I'm not a modeller myself but if I WAS, then I'd do something I wanted to.. If it proved popular then thats a bonus...  

Idiots like that should shut their grid... Just because they can't ship model themselves..... dick!!    

Atrahasis

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2003, 03:00:44 pm »
Starforce does have a point though. It's not just listening to what people want but also having a feel for what is needed, and what is needed is often the popular ships. If all a modeler does is the one-time wonders that are his own fanciful designs, they may or may not get used, but the most popular designs are the ones that will get Dl'd the most and survive the test of time and recieve the greatest acclaim. This should be a no-brainer.  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Atrahasis »

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2003, 03:11:08 pm »
Atrahasis,

That is your opinion,
it does not happen to be mine,

3d modders are not paid,
they do this for free,

What a 3d modder chooses is their own choice,
"its their baby",

3d modding is difficult, creative, and time consuming,
3d modders ultimatively do this out of pleasure and enjoyment,

Perhaps, Atrahasis, you would be so kind,
as to "volunteer" your entire 3d modding endeveaours to produce only what starforce2,
"eliquently" and so wisely requests,

It most certainly would keep you, Atrahasis
  "out of trouble" and
I dare say "beneviolently focused",


Agent Sloan

Quote:

Starforce does have a point though. It's not just listening to what people want but also having a feel for what is needed, and what is needed is often the popular ships. If all a modeler does is the one-time wonders that are his own fanciful designs, they may or may not get used, but the most popular designs are the ones that will survive the test of time. This should be a no-brainer.  



ActiveX

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2003, 03:14:17 pm »
I figure unless the modeler is being paid, then what they do should be their own...

But if you are paid, then you follow the money...

starforce2

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #6 on: September 22, 2003, 04:51:44 pm »
Quote:

I figure unless the modeler is being paid, then what they do should be their own...

But if you are paid, then you follow the money...  




Formo got me pissed over at sfc3 files by ranting on how his work gets 2 responses when it takes 30 hours to make, while kitbashes go make a ship in 15 minutes and get all the response. And that kitbashers hide behind the best parts. Now, just what does it matter? Kitbashing is a popular thing in the show, well, atleast ds9, thus kitbashes of canon classes are going to get more attention than fancy stuff. There will always be that fancy ship or one of the ones that's a bit unconventional that will defy all odds and get flocks of people (soulwolf, scorpion, ect). But alot of people liek canon or things based heavily on canon. His whole post basicly sounded as if he was either blamming the fans or the kitbashers for the lack of people paying attention to his mods. It's like trying to get a standing ovation for singing Eminem to a bunch of beetles fans. it's not going to work. You'll get a few and that's it. So it's logical if you want alot of attention you should find out what your audience is interested in atleast once in a while. And really, if all you do it for is the attention, well, that just sucks.  And I am not just refering to people here not doing MY requests.  So now because I challenged his logic he is going to hold this big vandetta agaist me and start a "flame starforce" campagin. Should be an interesting read, nothing good on tv tonight.

==============================================================================
Oh, and for the record, formo up there quoted a part of my post, didn't bother to show his:

Personnally I grow weary of kitbashers. Realize might get flamed big time for saying that. But I remember spending 50 hours on my 3rd mesh. Took that long because I was learning the software as well as meshing. Put together a quality mesh but can't really texture the best. So it gets maybe 2 responses. Often a kitbash can be thrown together in 15 minutes. Yea remapping the textures will take longer. But people always use the best textures that someone else did. Remap em and walla done, never even worked up a sweat and everyones like cool ship.

I now have a ship with over 2000 d/l's here and when I posted that ship in a forum all it got was basically flamed. A kitbasher hides behind others work. No one will flame them if they use all the best meshes and textures. Yet somehow it seems like they expect all the credits for the new design. Which is nothing more then adding 2 ships together.

Now again the last 2 files I post here only have a comment from a some whiny snot.

I myself will be doing kitbashes but I only use the stock models as I remember when I was a newbie, no body would respond to my emails asking for permission.

So I learned modeling not like most by kitbashing 1st and then making your own. I actually had modeled for 3 months before I did my 1st kitbash.

Aint I a long winded SOB

===========================================================

« Last Edit: September 22, 2003, 04:58:58 pm by starforce2 »

Atrahasis

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #7 on: September 22, 2003, 04:56:13 pm »
Just totally ignore the guy, don't respond at all to him. He's the one who called me and P81 all sorts of names over at another fourm, he's got serious attitude problems. Moreover, if he's in this for the attention as it sounds like he is, then he's attracting the wrong kind of attention by ranting like that.

K, not that's he's not entitled to rant, but he does get abusive and childish, so in my opinion just totally staying away from him is best.  

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #8 on: September 22, 2003, 04:57:23 pm »
starforce2,

No.
the source of this thread,
is you are a dick


Quote:

Quote:

I figure unless the modeler is being paid, then what they do should be their own...

But if you are paid, then you follow the money...  




Formo got me pissed over at sfc3 files by ranting on how his work gets 2 responses when it takes 30 hours to make, while kitbashes go make a ship in 15 minutes and get all the response. And that kitbashers hide behind the best parts. Now, just what does it matter? Kitbashing is a popular thing in the show, well, atleast ds9, thus kitbashes of canon classes are going to get more attention than fancy stuff. There will always be that fancy ship or one of the ones that's a bit unconventional that will defy all odds and get flocks of people (soulwolf, scorpion, ect). But alot of people liek canon or things based heavily on canon. His whole post basicly sounded as if he was either blamming the fans or the kitbashers for the lack of people paying attention to his mods. So now because I challenged his logic he is going to hold this big vandetta agaist me and start a "flame starforce" campagin. Should be an interesting read, nothing good on tv tonight.  





Agent Sloan

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #9 on: September 22, 2003, 05:00:28 pm »
Atrahasis,

You have have given a bang up accurate description
of yourself ...

You make such good 3d models
Alas,
If only you'd shut your face ....


Quote:

Just totally ignore the guy, don't respond at all to him. He's the one who called me and P81 all sorts of names over at another fourm, he's got serious attitude problems. Moreover, if he's in this for the attention as it sounds like he is, then he's attracting the wrong kind of attention by ranting like that.

K, not that's he's not entitled to rant, but he does get abusive and childish, so in my opinion just totally staying away from him is best.  




Quite.

Agent Sloan

starforce2

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #10 on: September 22, 2003, 05:01:51 pm »
Quote:

Just totally ignore the guy, don't respond at all to him. He's the one who called me and P81 all sorts of names over at another fourm, he's got serious attitude problems. Moreover, if he's in this for the attention as it sounds like he is, then he's attracting the wrong kind of attention by ranting like that.

K, not that's he's not entitled to rant, but he does get abusive and childish, so in my opinion just totally staying away from him is best.  




Yea, I reworded a few things in my last post and included his own from sfc3 files, we'll see what people think of what he said. Otherwise I'm pretty much done with this. He's even insulting me over spelling. I've never seen someone so anal over spelling mistakes.  

ActiveX

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #11 on: September 22, 2003, 05:02:04 pm »
GW...have you ever thought to remove the fricking forest from your eye rather then worry about the splinters in ours?

atheorhaven

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #12 on: September 22, 2003, 05:43:34 pm »
I'm going to only add to this thread to mention a few small details..

James, being a modeller (and learning mesher myself), I love to do my own thing.  My favourite ships to work on are usually not even Trek..  My TARDIS, my first mesh (the X-03), Red Dwarf and Starbug... that has been the original stuff that I've either worked on, or released.

But I would like to point out that there have actually been a fair number of ship requests over the last little bit, a good number of which have ben tackled or are being worked on.  Namely:


Underway (taken from my inbox here):
three upcoming TNG kitbash requests
Melak
KA luxury liner

Not underway by anyone to my knowledge:
USS typhon

requested and Released:
Vikrant and Durrett
Remora
TMP Andor


and threads with requests just from scanning the first few pages..

Another Connie Refit WIP (ATTN:AZEL!!!)
http://208.57.228.4/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB11&Number=172527&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1

Three b5 Ship Requests from an old friend
http://208.57.228.4/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB11&Number=171416&page=1&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1

Looking for DS9 models (yes, this one was from starforce2, but it's still a request)
http://208.57.228.4/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB11&Number=171607&page=1&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1

Minbari Ships
http://208.57.228.4/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB11&Number=171455&page=2&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1

TOS fanship
http://208.57.228.4/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB11&Number=95339&page=2&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1


So, it's not exactly fair to say there have been no ship requests lately.

But... a lot of stuff does get released and it does seem to fall into the "Great Modelling Hole" around here.  I also know this one to be true as well from personal experience.  The thing I do typically is just read the posts and look for things that interest me.  The damaged Connie kitbash I did is a prime example of someone's request that I tried to help with.  And the resized and reworked Doomsday Machine.  And the Melak (a long standing request in the community).

The thing to do is to be true to yourself here and do this for yourself.  If you see a request that looks cool, undertake it.  But remember, if you have a ship that you want to do that noone else has requested and you still want to do it.. that is also a request, even if only a request from self.  And that is equally as valid.  And you can equally be as happy with the final result... even if noone else says squat about it.  You still saw your vision come to life, and that's always a good thing.

starforce2 has certainly tread on some toes here when he first arrived, but I also blame it on coming over from the BC forum enviornment (which seems more pirhanna-like and less friendly to me) and not being aware (initially) of the unspoken rules we have.  And we all feel a bit defensive when our work heads over to other games because frequently the people that may be in BC, or Armada2, or other platforms may not be aware of the original author (namely us), and tend to credit the porter of the work.  But he *has* been lightening up over the last four or so weeks.

Think that's about all I'll add to this.  Just chill guys, and be at peace.  Let's do our thing.

Don't want mackie in here doing his happy wanky dance all over the flames and carnage.  

Captain Ron

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #13 on: September 22, 2003, 05:57:53 pm »
I ran out of Pop-corn can you guys wau=it an hour before comtinuing so I can get somemore?

James Formo

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #14 on: September 22, 2003, 05:59:07 pm »
Atheorhaven you make the most sense to me.

Atrahasis I am not biting.  Go do your TOS thing which you rock at    

 

starforce2

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #15 on: September 22, 2003, 06:00:34 pm »
The Andor is out? I saw a wip a day or 2 ago and it was half finished. But that is a good thing because P81's was intended for the E&F armada mod (where I got it from) and a new one is a good idea. I forgot who's doing it. it was looking good.

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #16 on: September 22, 2003, 06:44:09 pm »
Alec,

Once a "Mr. Morden ... always a Mr. Morden,"
Quote:


<snip>
starforce2 has certainly tread on some toes here when he first arrived, but I also blame it on coming over from the BC forum enviornment (which seems more pirhanna-like and less friendly to me) and not being aware (initially) of the unspoken rules we have. And we all feel a bit defensive when our work heads over to other games because frequently the people that may be in BC, or Armada2, or other platforms may not be aware of the original author (namely us), and tend to credit the porter of the work. But he *has* been lightening up over the last four or so weeks.








Mr. Garibaldi.
 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by GeneralWolfe »

starforce2

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #17 on: September 22, 2003, 06:53:39 pm »
seeing as how I have some what of a 6th sense I always thought of myself as a bit of a Bester myself...

Rogue NineCH

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #18 on: September 22, 2003, 09:28:35 pm »
Quote:

The Andor is out? I saw a wip a day or 2 ago and it was half finished. But that is a good thing because P81's was intended for the E&F armada mod (where I got it from) and a new one is a good idea. I forgot who's doing it. it was looking good.  




There is a TNG Andor version out.  I am starting  an update of it this week.

Personally I think there should be both, some of listening to people requests, some of do what you want done.  Everyone's style differs from person to person,  Think how boring it would be if we all did models the same way.  

Formo, not everyone can build a mesh from the ground up, if you take away the kitbashers from the community, and it will die quicker than a Ben Affleck/JLO movie at the theatres.  You take a risk when you make a completely original ship, people may not like it.  That's life, no one said it was fair.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Rogue NineCH »

starforce2

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #19 on: September 22, 2003, 09:59:15 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

The Andor is out? I saw a wip a day or 2 ago and it was half finished. But that is a good thing because P81's was intended for the E&F armada mod (where I got it from) and a new one is a good idea. I forgot who's doing it. it was looking good.  




There is a TNG Andor version out.  I am starting  an update of it this week.

 





This was a tmp I had seen. It had saucer and nacelles textured, but those big lobes on either side of the engeneering hull were still bank as were the rear pylons. I assumed it was a new model.

Steelviper33

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #20 on: September 22, 2003, 10:03:40 pm »
 General Wolf

WTF is your damage?!?!?
Get your foot outta your mouth.
Atrahasis made a good point (as did starforce2 and alec, mind you; and personally, to a degree I agree with them both)
Dont start up another flamewar dude, thats the main reason i left, I dont want to have to leave again.



 Starforce , coming from someone who only knows how to kitbash, we dont always get replys as well, in fact quite often my work is blown over, But this is what i figure..."if your happy with it, its their loss that they dont like it"

Rogue NineCH

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #21 on: September 22, 2003, 10:24:45 pm »
Quote:

This was a tmp I had seen. It had saucer and nacelles textured, but those big lobes on either side of the engeneering hull were still bank as were the rear pylons. I assumed it was a new model.  




i hadn't seen that one, anyway I am starting on too so either way there will be a TMP Andor.  

sandman69247

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #22 on: September 22, 2003, 10:26:15 pm »
God bless us all!!

OK, here's how I see things...Modelers do what we do because we all love ST, and SFC. I, as an improving modeler, do ships that interest me. That's not to say that I won't do a request, as the Remora and Azels Challenger attest to. Sometimes a request won't be made or even aknowledged, because, let's face it, there aren't many of us doing this on a regular basis. Also, most of the time we have projects already planned, or RL issues. Or, as is the case with myself, we get burned out. Some of you don't realize how much work it is to make a mesh, then texture, then hp/dp, then scale correctly for the game and then test ingame. Some of my earlier stuff only took a day or two to complete, from meshing to testing and release; those were my ealier stuff. As I get better at this, instead of taking less time, it takes longer. Why? Because if you look at my earlier stuff, the textures are very basic, and with my 1st release completely done by me (the Daedalus was textured by Pataflafla) I copied and pasted parts of pics from sites to my textures. Now, I do it all in PSP7 and PS7, and if you look at my ENT.C you can definitely tell a difference. That ship took about 2 days to mesh (wanted to get it right) and almost 2 weeks to texture. And I still had posts saying change this, don't do this, yada yada yada. I mean c'mon, there are still a few critics around who aren't particularly fond of P81's models and he is by popular consensus one of the best there is. As we go along, we get better. Sometimes a request might be for a ship that the modeler doesn't feel they have progressed to. Right now, I won't even attempt doing a Sovvy until I'm more comfortable with some of the meshing and texturing skills I am still learning.

As for kitbashers, I personally have nothing against them, as long as they follow the rules and common courtesy and give credit. I never really did any bashing until recently, due in most part because I didn't feel right about tearing up someones hard work and doing something else with it. It does get a little annoying when I spend all my free time (wife gets pissed ) doing a model, release it, go to chk comments and it's on page 3 with only a few people responding or even looking while someone who made a bash has 4 pages of responses. But, I just look at it as I'm building up a potfolio in case someone wants to offer me a job.....anyone?

As for people getting bent out of shape about spelling...when it is their name that is misspelled it's understandable. Or, when it is the best band there ever was...IT'S SPELLED BEATLES NOT beetles!!!

Everyone, just take a chill pill and enjoy all this wonderful stuff.

 

Mackie

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #23 on: September 22, 2003, 11:41:58 pm »
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHH!!!!!!!!!

*plugs fingers in ears* LALALALALALALALALALLALAAA

ActiveX

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #24 on: September 22, 2003, 11:43:19 pm »
*Starts using Sign Language*

starforce2

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #25 on: September 23, 2003, 12:16:20 am »
Quote:

Quote:

This was a tmp I had seen. It had saucer and nacelles textured, but those big lobes on either side of the engeneering hull were still bank as were the rear pylons. I assumed it was a new model.  




i hadn't seen that one, anyway I am starting on too so either way there will be a TMP Andor.  





ok, alec has one as well, but that aint the one I saw either, and I've xeached every page of every thread on the last 4 pages. I give up. Oh well.

DarkMatrix

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #26 on: September 23, 2003, 03:17:46 am »
James Formo  this how i see it works

normaly ships that are asked for gets lots of replys or by the top modelers p81,cleeve,andirul,Atrahasis  and few others as these guys are best we got thats why they get lots of replys just works that way they do most of time what people want

to guys like us who do new designs or stuff thats not seen alot. you will not always get  lots of replys just how it goes really but u find few months down the line someone will say anyone go so and so and u like hey i did that i`ll post it now for you
before you know it 20 pepole want it

as far as kitbashing go yes it can take 20mins but also take up to few hrs all down to the kitbash really ask kf on this  few i done for him it take ages some times to do the also i know ducktapewonders takes weeks over his sometimes its not always a 20min job
kitbashing is a art in someways

you find not everyone will like what you do take look at my pre-tos stuff i get few replys to them(thxs to everyone who has replyed its all good in my eyes )
its case not everyone likes tos/pre-tos some are pure tmp or tng if i see other 1701a i`ll cry (j/k)

take it lyran dreadnought i did i had alot of feedback oh her it was great help to me when needed everyone who cared about seeing pre-to lyrans was in the topic helping

just take it easy and mod and model for yourself man its best way at end of day you get great joy out of what u do and it people want it great :d

DM







 

Ducttapewonder

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #27 on: September 23, 2003, 03:39:53 am »
Quote:

James Formo  this how i see it works

normaly ships that are asked for gets lots of replys or by the top modelers p81,cleeve,andirul,Atrahasis  and few others as these guys are best we got thats why they get lots of replys just works that way they do most of time what people want

to guys like us who do new designs or stuff thats not seen alot. you will not always get  lots of replys just how it goes really but u find few months down the line someone will say anyone go so and so and u like hey i did that i`ll post it now for you
before you know it 20 pepole want it

as far as kitbashing go yes it can take 20mins but also take up to few hrs all down to the kitbash really ask kf on this  few i done for him it take ages some times to do the also i know ducktapewonders takes weeks over his sometimes its not always a 20min job
kitbashing is a art in someways

you find not everyone will like what you do take look at my pre-tos stuff i get few replys to them(thxs to everyone who has replyed its all good in my eyes )
its case not everyone likes tos/pre-tos some are pure tmp or tng if i see other 1701a i`ll cry (j/k)

take it lyran dreadnought i did i had alot of feedback oh her it was great help to me when needed everyone who cared about seeing pre-to lyrans was in the topic helping

just take it easy and mod and model for yourself man its best way at end of day you get great joy out of what u do and it people want it great :d

DM
 



Yeah!........What he said
 

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #28 on: September 23, 2003, 05:35:22 am »
SteelViper33,

Your reasons for leaving before, or now,
are your own,

I've never crossed swords with you,
and I don't intend to now,

Know this,
If you don't like my post,
report it to the Mods and Admins,


Quote:

 General Wolf

WTF is your damage?!?!?
Get your foot outta your mouth.
Atrahasis made a good point (as did starforce2 and alec, mind you; and personally, to a degree I agree with them both)
Dont start up another flamewar dude, thats the main reason i left, I dont want to have to leave again.
<snip>
 





Agent Sloan
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by GeneralWolfe »

Desty_Nova

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #29 on: September 23, 2003, 06:55:27 am »
This is a little OT

General Wolfe,
Please don't interpret this as a flame or 'making fun of you'(since you're probably on the defensive), but why are all of your posts written in what appears to be the format of some sort of poem? Just curious.

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #30 on: September 23, 2003, 07:03:40 am »
Hello Desty_Nova,

Thank you for your kind question,

Well,
I type the way I think,
when I get to the end of a line,
its where I pause, or end my thought,

Its just the way my thoughts come out,
as all,


Take care,
Agent Sloan

Desty_Nova

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #31 on: September 23, 2003, 07:31:29 am »
Hmmm, interesting.

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #32 on: September 23, 2003, 07:34:00 am »
LOL!

Thanks Mr. Spock ...
Dooh!  I mean Desty_Nova,



Quote:

Hmmm, interesting.  




I've been described by many adjectives,
but this is the first time "interesting" has come up,


Take care,
Agent Sloan

I_Mudd

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #33 on: September 23, 2003, 07:37:26 am »
You mean you actually think like that? For REAL?!  

I thought it was some kind of act to infuriate certain members of this forum!

I mean, come on! Who actually says "top drawer work"  these days? LOL!

so quirky...

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #34 on: September 23, 2003, 07:51:14 am »
I_Mudd,

Well,
you've got one person here that says "TOP-DRAWER",
that would be me ....  Agent Sloan ....

Why?
Its one saying that I grew up with, here in Ontario, Canada,
and I like it,

Top-Drawer, means first-choice,
one puts the first-choice stuff in the top drawer,

Its the same thing as top knotch,



Quote:

You mean you actually think like that? For REAL?!  

I thought it was some kind of act to infuriate certain members of this forum!

I mean, come on! Who actually says "top drawer work"  these days? LOL!

so quirky...  





Now ....
we can all add I_Mudd to the list of trolls that ole' Agent Sloan has spawned,
or is it one person,
with many troll frontnames,

No matter ....


Agent Sloan
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by GeneralWolfe »

I_Mudd

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #35 on: September 23, 2003, 07:54:25 am »
Donny,

you're the pot.

This is kettle.



You're black.


look up a few post.



dork.

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #36 on: September 23, 2003, 08:02:26 am »
Well I_Mudd,

or who ever you really are,
Don't you ever get tired of hiding behind troll names?

Really,
its the mark-of-a-coward, when you get down to it,


Quote:

Donny,

you're the pot.

This is kettle.



You're black.


look up a few post.



dork.  




Anyways,

IMHO, you picked a bad troll name to use towards me,
You see I've always favoured highly ole' Harcord Fenton Mudd,

(~Stella Mudd~)
" HARCORD! where have YOU BEEN, what is that on your breath? HAVE YOU BEEN DRINKING! "

(~Harry Mudd, when he realises he can't shut "Stella off"~)
" Aaaaaaaaaaaaaah STELLA 300 !!! .... Kirk you can't DO THIS TO ME!"



Anyways,
Fair-Warning,
your, I_Mudd troll name, will be very "ineffective" in this regard,

Sigh,
Amateur .....


Agent Sloan
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by GeneralWolfe »

I_Mudd

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #37 on: September 23, 2003, 08:04:57 am »
LOL!  

It IS true ...

Push a button and watch him go!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by I_Mudd »

Atrahasis

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #38 on: September 23, 2003, 08:07:49 am »
I might point out that it's not necesarily true that kitbashes are less popular or get blown over. Just look at my Klingon fleet, they are ALL kitbashes of Moon's original Ktinga, at times with signiifcant new parts added by me, but still they are kitbashes. But what decides if a model becomes popular or not is how well it's done and does it fill out a needed spot on the official shiplist, or any shiplist for that matter, official or personal? If the answer to that is Yes, then the model has a greater chance of becoming a "classic", at least until it's bumped off by a better version.  

 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Atrahasis »

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #39 on: September 23, 2003, 08:11:32 am »
Atrahasis,

Let us dispense with "the formalities",
and just get down to it,

I'm gonna politely ask you,
and then I'm gonna drop it, ok,


Atrahasis, is I_Mudd one of your troll names,
or what eh?


Quote:

I might point out that it's not necesarily true that kitbashes are less popular or get blown over. Just look at my Klingon fleet, they are ALL kitbashes of Moon's original Ktinga, at times with signiifcant new parts added by me, but still they are kitbashes. But what decides if a model becomes popular or not is how well it's done and does it fill out a needed spot on the official shiplist, or any shiplist for that matter, official or personal? If the answer to that is Yes, then the model has a greater chance of becoming a "classic", at least until it's bumped off by a better version.  

 





Agent Sloan
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by GeneralWolfe »

I_Mudd

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #40 on: September 23, 2003, 08:25:38 am »
Y'know, I'm flattered.


Atrahasis is a great modeller and I've always admired his posts, but Don, seriously, click on my name.

I used to be here as Adrix ( I did a little Mirror Universe site about a year and a half to two years ago. ). I changed my name here because, quite frankly, I forgot my password and I changed my ISP. If you look real close you'll find that I activated this account sometime in June.
 
I normally just lurk around, but after about 2 years of reading your quirky posts, I had to know first hand just how much of a predictable "yap first - make sense later...maybe" guy you are. The whole process has been reveilling, as well as entertaining. My thanks for your participation.  

The former lurker formerly known as Adrix.

I_Mudd.
 

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #41 on: September 23, 2003, 08:31:43 am »
I_Mudd,


Here is an interesting observation,

As I_Mudd was doing his thing,
in tandem ole' Atrahasis was doing his thing,
that would be opening and posting threads,
in unison,

Admittedly ... a coincidental observation,
but "God Bless the whos-on-line tracker,"

Anyways,
I don't believe one word of what you've said, I_Mudd,
'cause, this doesn't really matter who you are,


Anyways,
back to 3d modding eh,


Agent Sloan

Quote:

Y'know, I'm flattered.


Atrahasis is a great modeller and I've always admired his posts, but Don, seriously, click on my name.

I used to be here as Adrix ( I did a little Mirror Universe site about a year and a half to two years ago. ). I changed my name here because, quite frankly, I forgot my password and I changed my ISP. If you look real close you'll find that I activated this account sometime in June.
 
I normally just lurk around, but after about 2 years of reading your quirky posts, I had to know first hand just how much of a predictable "yap first - make sense later...maybe" guy you are. The whole process has been reveilling, as well as entertaining. My thanks for your participation.  

The former lurker formerly known as Adrix.

I_Mudd.
   


« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by GeneralWolfe »

Smiley

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #42 on: September 23, 2003, 08:35:33 am »
At the risk of being accused of being a troll....I have to agree with I_Mudd - Don Dawson is very predictable and while I don't want to insult you Don - you really should use a bit of variety in your posts! I mean, we all know what you are going to say about something before we have even read it!

And before you say that is how you think - we all think certain things - it doesn't mean you have to write it down! And if "top-drawer" is all you think, you must have a very boring mind.  

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #43 on: September 23, 2003, 08:49:06 am »
Smiley,

(i) No. You are not a troll.  Mackie would not make you a Mod at the Mackie Stuff, if you were,
(ii).  You do not like my attitude ... I do not like yours, this would a "stand-off",
(iii).  I like the expression "TOP-DRAWER", and I shall keept using it,


Quote:

At the risk of being accused of being a troll....I have to agree with I_Mudd - Don Dawson is very predictable and while I don't want to insult you Don - you really should use a bit of variety in your posts! I mean, we all know what you are going to say about something before we have even read it!

And before you say that is how you think - we all think certain things - it doesn't mean you have to write it down! And if "top-drawer" is all you think, you must have a very boring mind.  





Agent Sloan

Smiley

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #44 on: September 23, 2003, 08:50:57 am »
Why do you not like my attitude, Don?

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #45 on: September 23, 2003, 09:04:15 am »
Smiley,

In my opinion,
you are an arrogant hypocritic,
you say that you do not mean to insult, and then you do,

You remind of some of my Moms' relatives from the UK,
I'm well aware of the UK sarcastic "cutting style",
and frankly I don't care for it,

Probably just as much as you feel that "my mind is boring to you,"
BTW,
why Mackie picked you for a Mod at The Mackie Stuff,
is frankly beyond me,
but hey, that is Mackies' Dominion,


Quote:

Why do you not like my attitude, Don?  





Agent Sloan

Azel

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #46 on: September 23, 2003, 09:09:28 am »
Gentlemen(And I am usinging this term somewhat losely...lol)

I consider all of you my colleagues and Friends(hell I admirer alot of you guys alot)
But there is No need for this... Please
This all started with my ships being converted to BC(who Cares??? If you like my stuff then great...if you don't then equally great).
Please end this thread and the otherone that Has my Hellions involved.
Please
I would think that there are better and greater projects to be done and shared with this Great community.
Anyone who knows me knows that I love everyones work and support it...I especially love Kitbashes(Hell been trying to get the kitbashers off their tails to kitbash some of my stuff )they bring in a fresh perspective on a design's configuation that some one had never thought of before.

Now I am a realist...and thus donot expect (in my right state of mind that is )everyone to get along as brothers..but we can be at least civil towards each other

So lets close this mockery of a thread and lets get down to some new and fresh ideas.

Thanks guys  

Smiley

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #47 on: September 23, 2003, 09:33:57 am »
Quote:

Smiley,

In my opinion,
you are an arrogant hypocritic,
you say that you do not mean to insult, and then you do,

You remind of some of my Moms' relatives from the UK,
I'm well aware of the UK sarcastic "cutting style",
and frankly I don't care for it,

Probably just as much as you feel that "my mind is boring to you,"
BTW,
why Mackie picked you for a Mod at The Mackie Stuff,
is frankly beyond me,
but hey, that is Mackies' Dominion,

Agent Sloan  




Your interpretation of my post as hypocritical may well be justified, but I was just trying to ensure that it was clear to all that I wasn't saying it for the sake of insulting you, however I'd love to see your reasons for naming me arrogant!
Perhaps if you would dismount from your lofty position of name calling and all-round opinionating, you would realise that such presumptuous and assuming behaviour that you continually display is characteristic of one who is indeed arrogant himself!
You do not know me and yet you dare to pass judgement on me?
Not only do you insult me, but you justify your assertion by insulting the rest of my country as well! You have a flair for audacity Mr. Dawson, we can certainly say that for you!
If anything, my comment was a suggestion, that if taken into consideration, would lessen the cringe that I am sure many of the frequenters of this forum feel every time we endure one of your repetative posts. Even our youngest members can tailor their compliments and comments with more variety and tact than you show.
And if you actually read what I posted, you would see that I didn't say that your mind was boring, I said that if the only phrase that you have in it is "top-drawer" then it must be boring.

Can anyone here imagine a world where Don was a moderator? :shudder:

Leave your cliquey comments and racist judgementality at home Don, and purchase a thesaurus if you don't already have one. Maybe you could try using it once in a while?

   

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #48 on: September 23, 2003, 09:54:43 am »
Smiley,


I do not say these things lightly to you,
I say what I mean, and I mean what I say,

I have read your posts,
and I simply find you an arrogant hypocritic,

But that is just my opinion,
and what should it matter to you?

BTW
Quote:


<snip>
Leave your cliquey comments and racist judgementality at home Don,






Cliquey?
Racist?
Judgemental?

Well,
that is one outta a three,

I'm Judgemental, well that is quite evident indeed,
Smiley,
Bravo ... how "estute of you",


On the contary,
I hold the UK ( the Mother Country in very high regard),
its is just you, Smiley, that I have a very "low-opinion" of,
Please try to be accurate, will you,

I mean "sloppiness" is so untidy,
is it not?


Quote:

Quote:

Smiley,

In my opinion,
you are an arrogant hypocritic,
you say that you do not mean to insult, and then you do,

You remind of some of my Moms' relatives from the UK,
I'm well aware of the UK sarcastic "cutting style",
and frankly I don't care for it,

Probably just as much as you feel that "my mind is boring to you,"
BTW,
why Mackie picked you for a Mod at The Mackie Stuff,
is frankly beyond me,
but hey, that is Mackies' Dominion,

Agent Sloan  




Your interpretation of my post as hypocritical may well be justified, but I was just trying to ensure that it was clear to all that I wasn't saying it for the sake of insulting you, however I'd love to see your reasons for naming me arrogant!
Perhaps if you would dismount from your lofty position of name calling and all-round opinionating, you would realise that such presumptuous and assuming behaviour that you continually display is characteristic of one who is indeed arrogant himself!
You do not know me and yet you dare to pass judgement on me?
Not only do you insult me, but you justify your assertion by insulting the rest of my country as well! You have a flair for audacity Mr. Dawson, we can certainly say that for you!
If anything, my comment was a suggestion, that if taken into consideration, would lessen the cringe that I am sure many of the frequenters of this forum feel every time we endure one of your repetative posts. Even our youngest members can tailor their compliments and comments with more variety and tact than you show.
And if you actually read what I posted, you would see that I didn't say that your mind was boring, I said that if the only phrase that you have in it is "top-drawer" then it must be boring.

Can anyone here imagine a world where Don was a moderator? :shudder:

Leave your cliquey comments and racist judgementality at home Don, and purchase a thesaurus if you don't already have one. Maybe you could try using it once in a while?

   





Agent Sloan


 

Captain KoraH

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #49 on: September 23, 2003, 10:19:46 am »
I have only one thing to say:

I have very very rarely seen ANY requests for anything. I dunno what Starforce2 is talking about, because as far as I knew all the nice SFC fans are happy to get anything new and have never placed demands on the modeling community to produce certain ships over others.  

I_Mudd

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #50 on: September 23, 2003, 10:29:30 am »
I'll be darned.

Don hit it square on the nose, but probably doesn't realize it.

"But that is just my opinion,
and what should it matter to you?"

This tiresome thread ( which I may be party to it's "tiresomness", I'll admit. ) was initially created over someones OPINION.
Why does any of this thread matter?

I_Mudd.

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #51 on: September 23, 2003, 10:31:12 am »
Hello Captain KoraH,

I completely concur.



Quote:

I have only one thing to say:

I have very very rarely seen ANY requests for anything. I dunno what Starforce2 is talking about, because as far as I knew all the nice SFC fans are happy to get anything new and have never placed demands on the modeling community to produce certain ships over others.  




Take care,
Agent Sloan

DookeyKing

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #52 on: September 23, 2003, 10:53:41 am »
First of all, I've been around these forums since before EAW came out(my post count is meaningless).  With that said,  In the years that I've been around here I've seen Mr. Dawson personally attack damn near every modeller in the joint at one time or another (Atrahasis and P81 jump immediately to mind).  I would guess the reason behind these attacks to be jealousy.  Those who receive acclaim from (apparently) any of the ST modding communities are open game for him.  I mean for petes sake:  what kind of person would call Smiley arrogant.  I've never seen him as anything other than a friendly helpful asset to this community.  So, MR. Dawson, if by arrogant you mean Skillful or Successful, then Yes Smiley is one arrogant SOB. Otherwise you are showing your true dimentia.  Do this community a favor and wander off.

Thank You.
Scott  

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #53 on: September 23, 2003, 11:17:32 am »
DookeyKing,

Your account is "inaccuate",


Quote:

First of all, I've been around these forums since before EAW came out(my post count is meaningless).  With that said,  In the years that I've been around here I've seen Mr. Dawson personally attack damn near every modeller in the joint at one time or another (Atrahasis and P81 jump immediately to mind).  I would guess the reason behind these attacks to be jealousy.  Those who receive acclaim from (apparently) any of the ST modding communities are open game for him.  I mean for petes sake:  what kind of person would call Smiley arrogant.  I've never seen him as anything other than a friendly helpful asset to this community.  So, MR. Dawson, if by arrogant you mean Skillful or Successful, then Yes Smiley is one arrogant SOB. Otherwise you are showing your true dimentia.  Do this community a favor and wander off.

Thank You.
Scott  





To re-cap,

My "attacks" we always centred on Atrahasis,

Why?

It goes back to the First "Great Flame-War",
that was over Model Permissions,

the standard accept procedure of,
citing all the credits of all the original modders, and obtaining there permission prior to public release,
ahs long been estiablished, adhered to by all, and frankly has served the SFC community well sinse then,

But you being around then,
and avidly reading the Models Forum would be well aware of these facts,

Lets call a spade-a-spade,

as  newbie, a couple Yarheens back,
I foolishly walked into a "blood-feud" whose events were,

The Great 3d Model Embargo, where,
Pneumonic81,
Atrahasis,
Anduril,
-LB-,


pulled down all there 3d models,

and
Captain Starkillers' BlackOps Station got nuked,

Those were the events,
If you do not recall then,
go to the achieves, and re-read 'em,

Now,
as to the people mentioned above,

Pneumonic81 and I get along fine now,
Anduril, I believe has long forgiven me,

I still tkae to ole' Captain Starkiller, now and then,
and frankly I miss the guy,

Now,
Atrahasis,
I stil can not stand him,
but a truce "of sorts" exists between us,

-LB-, well Greg Strong sent me a rather "pleasant" personal e-mail,
that I've kept, just in case for legal purposes, if needs be,

Oh yes,
I left out James Formo,
I consider James a friend,
And I do not like seeing Atrahasis attack him,

James and I unfortunately got off to a bad start,
as some [censored] head named Dim Dawson was cyber-stalking me,
at the time,

and Dim Dawson and I, unfortunately "had it out" in James thread,
debuting his marvelous USS Bradbury,

I've long since apologise to James for that,
and I'd like to think of him as a friend,

Anyways,

DookeyKing,
If you know anything at all,
you should know that everything that I've typed here is a truthful, honest, and accurate,
recounting of the events,


Agent Sloan
 

James Formo

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #54 on: September 23, 2003, 11:28:36 am »
In a way I am sorry I started this thread, but I believe sometimes just laying it all out so to speak can help clear the air. I am impressed with how Starforce2 has kept his cool. Kinda wondered what he was about for a bit, but he seems on the up and up.

Do'nt feel like we need to rehash the enitre history of the forum over the last couple of years though.  

btw chack out my new avatar.  hehe  I think I get back to modding now   Wow this thread has a life of its own  

NannerSlug

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #55 on: September 23, 2003, 11:56:40 am »
guys.. please keep things civil. discuss issues, not people. i know personally that each of you are good guys.. please look at each other in a positive light to what they bring to the community - not what they negatives they do.

we have enough negativism going through the world right now - the last place should be here and now where we enjoy spending our free time.

thanks.

Reverend

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #56 on: September 23, 2003, 12:57:29 pm »
exactly what my Azel and Nannerslug have said... this is the only forum I ever visit, as I get tired of poeple in general from, working in the church... lot of fibbers there.
I have always enjoyed everyone's great works and interesting opinions... I have been trying so hard to get attention and make friends here, and then I feel another collapse like in this area's history is coming; maybe you guys just need to re-understand there are personal spaces that differ in width amongst us.... I require very little, while Smiley needs a lot more personal space form my own experience... some people are just touchier than others. It's not a character flaw, really, its just how people are.
Next time someone gets fussy or irritable, find out what triggered it, and either amend for it, or go around it and keep going in a slightly different direction.
 

starforce2

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #57 on: September 23, 2003, 05:14:23 pm »
Quote:

I have only one thing to say:

I have very very rarely seen ANY requests for anything. I dunno what Starforce2 is talking about, because as far as I knew all the nice SFC fans are happy to get anything new and have never placed demands on the modeling community to produce certain ships over others.  





I think that is because it is comming to be like bridge comamnder. Our ship request threads where hguly popular at the begining. Now, after a few of them have been repalced due to spammers or being excessivley long, they're dieng out. People think it's a waste of time to request things when nobody will pay attention. This forum is far older than bridge comamnder. The requests died long ago cuz nobody bothers to do them anyways. Nobody wastes their time any more., or, rather, hardly anyone. Hell, it took me a year of pestering various people to get a decent ronin class made. I lucked out on the chimera, the origial author made an armada version at 2000 poly, and it's huge popularity resulted (I assume) in smiley making a low version of chimera 2.0. Although I have given up for a while, I am still trying to get someone for atolms uss premontion drawing, cuz lets face it, the armada prem just plain sucks. I had the same problem trying to convince someone to do the husnock and tamarain ship from darmok. Now why should it take anyone (me or otherwise) a YEAR of bugging people to get a single ship, especialy one that's canon or has alot of references? That shouldn't happen in a place with this many active modelers. I can see why there's few requests. People get tired of going blue in the face making them. That's just my feelings on the matter.


Now I'm not saying I'm personaly not happy with the stuff I already see here. You have mackies tmp bashes, GAFY?"s funny retextures of FedEx and stuff, darkdrone has pre-tos feds that rule, Wicked Zombie is pretty much the king of Klingons, Atra's recent comeback has my jaw on the floor, and that's just the begining.

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #58 on: September 23, 2003, 05:58:37 pm »
starforce2,


This place is nothing like the Bridge Commander Forum,
this community is of much higher-caliber,

At any rate,

atheorhaven has given you examples of his personal contributions,
If you have interest in 3d mods,
then I sincerely suggest that you consider trying your own hand af SFC,
not BC,
but SFC modding,


Agent Sloan
Quote:


<snip>
   I think that is because it is comming to be like bridge comamnder. Our ship request threads where hguly popular at the begining. Now, after a few of them have been repalced due to spammers or being excessivley long, they're dieng out. People think it's a waste of time to request things when nobody will pay attention. This forum is far older than bridge comamnder. The requests died long ago cuz nobody bothers to do them anyways. Nobody wastes their time any more., or, rather, hardly anyone. Hell, it took me a year of pestering various people to get a decent ronin class made.







Quote:

Quote:

I have only one thing to say:

I have very very rarely seen ANY requests for anything. I dunno what Starforce2 is talking about, because as far as I knew all the nice SFC fans are happy to get anything new and have never placed demands on the modeling community to produce certain ships over others.  





I think that is because it is comming to be like bridge comamnder. Our ship request threads where hguly popular at the begining. Now, after a few of them have been repalced due to spammers or being excessivley long, they're dieng out. People think it's a waste of time to request things when nobody will pay attention. This forum is far older than bridge comamnder. The requests died long ago cuz nobody bothers to do them anyways. Nobody wastes their time any more., or, rather, hardly anyone. Hell, it took me a year of pestering various people to get a decent ronin class made. I lucked out on the chimera, the origial author made an armada version at 2000 poly, and it's huge popularity resulted (I assume) in smiley making a low version of chimera 2.0. Although I have given up for a while, I am still trying to get someone for atolms uss premontion drawing, cuz lets face it, the armada prem just plain sucks. I had the same problem trying to convince someone to do the husnock and tamarain ship from darmok. Now why should it take anyone (me or otherwise) a YEAR of bugging people to get a single ship, especialy one that's canon or has alot of references? That shouldn't happen in a place with this many active modelers. I can see why there's few requests. People get tired of going blue in the face making them. That's just my feelings on the matter.


Now I'm not saying I'm personaly not happy with the stuff I already see here. You have mackies tmp bashes, GAFY?"s funny retextures of FedEx and stuff, darkdrone has pre-tos feds that rule, Wicked Zombie is pretty much the king of Klingons, Atra's recent comeback has my jaw on the floor, and that's just the begining.  


« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by GeneralWolfe »

Chris Jones

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #59 on: September 23, 2003, 06:27:15 pm »
DON -

ENOUGH ALREADY.

I frequent the BC Forums, and I find it quite peaceful. I also am finding new found respect, largely due to to Starforce, for SFC conversions to BC.  I see mentions of SFC in the comments of various downloads on BC Files. Now more than ever the two games, BC and SFC3, have mutual respect for each other.

I would ask that you calm down and let this thread die.

Starforce's opinions on model requests has some merit. If i was a modeler I would take requests into consideration, but I would concentrate on what I liked to do as well. It's a mixed bag. Atra is the TOS king, where P81 is the TMP and TNG King, and his first love, IIRC, is FASA. Modelers will make what they like, generally.  

On another note, Since I play BC a lot now and am still doing systems for it, I can tell you that Starforce does a top notch job on the hardpoints on any ship he works on. The VVorath collection, as an example.

I liked your Klink Kitbashes, by the way. I'd like to see them in BC.


Your friend,

Chris  
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Chris Jones »

Chris Jones

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #60 on: September 23, 2003, 06:45:25 pm »
and consider deleting that other thread..

Please e-mail me with your feelings on this whole thing. I have some things to tell you, but not here.


Chris

SPQR Renegade001

  • Guest
Re: OT Starforce's opinion on modelers
« Reply #61 on: September 23, 2003, 10:53:37 pm »
Quote:


But if more scratch modelers would listen up and pay attention to what people are requesting atleast 50% of the time there'd be less whiners. So many modlers do only what they want instead of what is actualy needed or wanted by the people that when even an amature quality model of some rare ship comes out, it blows you big boys off the charts. Think about it.





 

You guys keep doing what your doing. Make the models you want to make, when you feel like making them, because you want to make them. If a request interests you, take it on. If not, walk away.

Until you start getting money from me for what you do, I have the right to expect or demand exactly nothing from you. Anything beyond that is a huge bonus for the peeps who still play these games.

Thanks for all the models guys (and at least one gal), and don't let anoying few get ya down.