Topic: Heavy Command Cruiser (FCB) (Read 13958 times)

Cromwell · « **Reply #20 on:** December 10, 2007, 04:20:40 pm »

wow, not a big tos or tmp fan but I have to bow down before a greatly detailed modly, nicely done. I look forward to the release of this one.

Starforce2 · « **Reply #21 on:** December 10, 2007, 07:30:03 pm »

It's out already, as I have it, unless this is a different version.

ModelsPlease · « **Reply #22 on:** December 11, 2007, 12:58:16 pm »

Quote from: Starforce2 on December 10, 2007, 07:30:03 pm

It's out already, as I have it, unless this is a different version.

you are correct it's at battleclinic

Age · « **Reply #23 on:** December 12, 2007, 03:40:44 pm »

Looks good Rod but I do like Warp Nacelles the same as P81s.

Rod ONeal · « **Reply #24 on:** December 19, 2007, 02:08:09 am »

Thanks for the comments, guys. I guess some of you were on holiday when she was released.

Here's the DL link at Battleclinic.

http://www.battleclinic.com/docks/dock.php?id=4420#4420

Don Karnage · « **Reply #25 on:** December 19, 2007, 06:54:20 pm »

i was thinking something different for the deflectors dish, something between the golden dish and the grid of tmp, and about the impulse engine something close to the tos but not the tmp one would be interesting

Rod ONeal · « **Reply #26 on:** December 19, 2007, 08:08:06 pm »

Quote from: DonKarnage on December 19, 2007, 06:54:20 pm

i was thinking something different for the deflectors dish, something between the golden dish and the grid of tmp, and about the impulse engine something close to the tos but not the tmp one would be interesting

The original idea was to incorporate the most popular design elements from the tmp Ent on a TOS "airframe". I had to modify it a bit. For example, I was going to use TMP aztecing, but when I did I didn't really like the look. I went with a more basic plating instead. The TMP deflector and impulse though were two popular TMP aspects that I thought worked on the ship. So, I went with them.

News: