Topic: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products  (Read 18582 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

KBF-Dogmatix

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #40 on: February 11, 2003, 07:18:59 pm »
Yes...that's a tad unseemly, but we've seen this sort of thing before.  I mean, Intel used to get away with murder on benchmarks that were geared towards their special, proprietary instruction set.  In fact, I remember hearing reports of pressure being exerted on the part of Intel to make sure certain benchmarks went their way as a method of keeping AMD down.  Finally, AMD broke out from under that thumb with the advent of the Athlon and hasn't had to look back yet.

I imagine ATI's shennanigans were born out of desperation.  The Radeon 8500 release was either going to keep them alive or kill them.  Frankly, I'm glad they stayed alive...so nVidia can no longer easily get away with charging $400-$500 for a freaking graphics adapter.


I currently own three ATI products (7500 in my laptop, 8500 on one of my desktops and 9700 Pro in my newest box) and my first CGA card way back in the day (1986?) was an ATI card (I even stil have the purple fluffy ball with feet, eyes and antennae that came with it) and am quite happy with all three products though I haven't tried running SFC3 on my 9700 Pro, yet...haven't been moved to play that game, lately.


 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by KBF-Dogmatix »

Hawkwind

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #41 on: February 13, 2003, 11:56:52 am »
LOL.

While I can totally understand Taldren for making this statement, I can't say I agree with it.

I've been a Engineer all my life (over 20 years) and would hazard a guess that I've have installed more of their cards into machines than anyone currently working for ATI.

Basically (and this is solely my own professional opinion), Great cards probably one of the best if not the best out there, totally let down by their drivers and support.  So much so that I don't supply them as standard in any machine I build now.

Yup, there will be many users that have few problems however I can certainly tell you there's a hell of alot that do, and it's not exactly a secret either, this has been the state of play for years.

This has always been one area that Nvidia etc has always been ahead of, and perhaps one of the main reasons why they are where they are today, because people like myself plump for them because we know we'll have far fewer headaches supporting them.

Credit where's credits due, and like I say that's my own opinion and has nothing to do at all with Taldren, and well if ya want to waste your time comming after a guy like me instead of improving your products well go for it!. ROFL

 
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Hawkwind »

Intrepid-XC

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #42 on: February 13, 2003, 02:10:19 pm »
Well I recently went form a Geforce 3 to an ATI Radeon 9500 Pro.  The difference is incredible.  I run with 8X AA and 16x AS with great framerates (In fact they are as good as teh GF4 Ti 4600 with no AA and AS).  As for drivers the Catalyst 3.0 and now the 3.1 drivers have produced absolutly no problems.  Before the catalyst team, I would have agreed that ATI had crap for drivers, but the Catalyst team is on top of things,  and I feel they are finally producing quality drivers for ATI.    

KBF-Dogmatix

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #43 on: February 13, 2003, 04:51:00 pm »
Well, Hawkwind...drivers may have been an issue once upon a time, but they certaily aren't anymore.  I don't see much to be gained by continuing to live in the past on this account.  Granted...driver problems were a problem as recently as a few months ago, but the Catalyst team is getting their act together and to continue to ignore ATI because of their drivers seems kind of silly, at this point.


Of course, you have a business to run and you must to what works for you.  As an end-user, I'm happy with ATI and I choose to make choices (painful though they may be, at times) that favor makretplace competition so I don't have to be held hostage by relative monopolies.  I continue to do my part to see that companies like nVidia and Intel have lively competition in the likes of ATI and AMD.



 

David Ferrell

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #44 on: February 13, 2003, 05:52:35 pm »
It seems, as far as drivers go at least, I am an old fool who is out of
touch with reality.

I'm glad to hear that ATI is kicking some tail with thier Catalyst drivers.

Thanks,

Dave  

Dash Jones

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #45 on: February 13, 2003, 07:59:21 pm »
Well, there's hell breaking out with the new catalyst drivers, and Neverwinter Nights (which is buggy as heck to begin with...so I suppose it's not surprising).  Overall though, despite how fun it might be to point it towards ATI, in this case I think the fault probably lies mostly in Bioware and their idea of their 1.28 patch, which causes havoc with ATI...BUT once you have updated to DX9 and other small things, as well as making sure you have the correct version of the 1.28 patch apparantly, it runs much better than before.

Nvidia runs well with NWN without the need to upgrade from what I understand.  As I said, it would be fun to poke fun at ATI, but it probably in all likelyhood is Bioware and what they put in the patch, as no other games I know of right now have problems with the 3.1 release (which I've heard almost completely good things about thus far!).

Sartonius

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #46 on: February 15, 2003, 02:02:45 am »
I find that with compatibility issues, more often than not the ATI drivers offer "too much control"...   In other words, the system options can override the game's options and settings, or the game can override the system options only to have the system attempt to re-exert control...  or some bizarre combination of the above resulting in weird things happening like text displaying incorrectly when filtering is enabled, for example.  Or, the Radeon 7000 / 7200 / 7500 (all of which are the same except they have different RAM types and amounts on them) having some backwards compatibility problems with games designed to use a 4 MB "early" 3D accelerator that I tried out.

ONCE you get it going, the Radeon cards are quite good.  I was using a 7200, but it crapped out because of my "experimental" system (lol).  I bought a 9000 Pro to replace it and I think it's quite good.  I finally decided that for older and/or "noncompatible" games I would just go down to the local computer junk store and build myself an "old-fashioned" system to ensure greater backwards compatibility:  a PII 233 with a Voodoo3 3DFX card, a Sound Blaster AWE32, and Windows 98.  Runs old games, 3DFX games, old DOS games, DOS 3DFX games, and finally 3D type games such as the X-Wing Collector's trilogy (highly reccomended, btw) that don't work well with new accelerators and only work in windows 98.  And still surfs the web in style.  I spent about $75 US on it and a little bit of spare time.  I named it the USS Legacy.  <g>  But it's only because of the same driver issues we started off discussing in the first place made it more economical to.  In the end, that's because it's no longer plug-and-play like it oughta be.

What would be really nice is if you only ever needed to use the "override" controls for the card very rarely.  Software developers, card developers, and Microsoft's DirectX team ought to work on a new standard.  DirectX should be able to read any game using any version of DirectX, determine what it uses, what can be successfully applied to it and what cannot, automatically enable and disable certain functions of the card, make some adjustable performance-issue decisions on the basis of your system's clock and memory, and start the thing going without so much fiddling.  Call it "plug and play"  for games or something.  Then it wouldn't matter which drivers you had going.  The only difference would be on concrete performance:  speed in multiplayer; speed on slower systems; stability; and what you actually see once the game goes.  It's far too "willy nilly" now.


 

Dash Jones

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #47 on: February 15, 2003, 09:44:22 am »
More ATI problems, this time with SimCity 4.  Actually, it's not that bad and for me, not the showstopper people have complained about, in fact, it's not bad to say the least, overall.  Their patch did not help however.

I've heard though, that some people with the new Nvidia drivers can't run the game at all, so in that light, I suppose I should count my blessings.  Haven't run into that problem yet, but I thought to be fair and show all sides of the thing, I should include that little point as well.

LongTooth

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #48 on: February 15, 2003, 10:06:34 am »
Any one know how well ati runs with max? need a new card and ati seems the best over all
Just need to know if its going to like max or not

zaniwhoop2

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #49 on: February 15, 2003, 01:24:43 pm »
I believe xbitlabs.com has an article on the Radeon and Quadro series in 3DS Max. They use the professional series though.  Article Here  They actually took a Radeon 9700 Pro and modified it so the drivers would think it was a professional series.  

Dash Jones

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #50 on: February 15, 2003, 02:14:19 pm »
Quote:

I believe xbitlabs.com has an article on the Radeon and Quadro series in 3DS Max. They use the professional series though.  Article Here  They actually took a Radeon 9700 Pro and modified it so the drivers would think it was a professional series.  




Though some of it was a little confusing to me, I believe their conclusion came in favor (and their pictures seemed to show it) of the Nvidia Quadro FX.

Also, if you link on the page for the Radeon, that's an interesting way to modify the Radeon card.  I wouldn't want to attempt something like that though, waaaay to delicate I would imagine.

Mavolic

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #51 on: February 15, 2003, 06:27:25 pm »
It may have been posted before this, but I didn't read every post in this thread, so forgive me..

www.rage3d.com has some indepth information on the ATI line of video cards and drivers.  They also have ATI employees responding in their forums.

Not to metion some very useful tweaks.

If you have any doubts about the Radeon line of video cards, especially the 9000 series on up, you could learn alot about how far ATI has come.

If you think Nvidia is the only player on the block, and that their hardware and software never have any problems, you best take the blinders off.

I've used 3dfx, Nvidia, and now ATI, I have to say the 9700pro I am using now is simply outstanding.

I've play a few of those "problem" games, and I don't seem to be experiencing near the same problems being reported.  It probably has to do with the fact that I have started from a fresh install of WinXP Pro, so I'm not having to fight hidden compatability troubles.

Try installing your OS, any service packs, DirectX, THEN the Catalyst drivers.  I imagine some of those "crappy ATI driver" problems go away.

I've been using Nvidia cards for the past couple of years and have seen some strange hardware compatibilty problems, funky game problems, and some really weak Dentonator driver releases.

In other words, I don't really see any major advantage that Nvidia has in terms of driver support anymore.  Yes at one time they were the masters at drivers, but they too have had their share of "crappy" drivers.  So acting like Nvidia can do no wrong, is only fooling yourself.

The GeforceFX is an overclocked-to-hell-and-back video card, that still can't soundly beat the Radeon 9700Pro running a 500mhz clock vs. a 325mhz clock.  Not to metion clock speed isn't everything.  Just as with processors, motherboards, and memory, video cards depend on bandwith just as much as clock speed, and that's the biggest disappointment with the GeforceFX.  Also the quality settings such as AA, Anisotropic Filtering, and just overall image quality is stil pulled off better by the 9700pro than the FX.  

In so far as "skewed" benchmark on cards.  ATI hasn't done anything that Nvidia and Intel hasn't done already.  Nowdays every video card manafacture optimise for benchmarks.  Your in deep trouble if you don't.  In this day and age, people want to look at bar chart and some numbers to do their decision making for them instead of putting any effort into finding out themselves.  

On the Rage3D forums, much like the Taldren forums, it is very impressive to see the active partcipation by ATI on those boards.   They have been going above and beyond to try and squash the "driver myth" that is still continued by people.  Put it this way, I don't see anything Nvidia is doing now that is any better than what ATI is doing.  

But hey, for the Nvidia fanboys, if you sleep better at night by sticking only to the Geforce cards, then it's your money.  But a couple of points to keep in mind if and when you get your FX.

1) The Radeon 9700Pro has been on the market for SIX months.  That's alot of time for the developers at ATI to work on mature driver sets.  Especially considering the FX isn't even avalible yet, how long do you suppose it's going to take Nvidia to squash their bugs with the card?

2) The Radeon 9700Pro has a proven track record, that sorta comes from being out for a half a year.  The GeforceFX has been delayed more than once, and still isn't availible yet.  So which company do you think is on top of things?  Nvidia or ATI?  Which company seems to be scrambling to catch up, and which one seems to be on cruise control?  ATI's upgrade to the R300 chip is right around the corner.  Anyone want to hazard a guess that the R350 chip will surpass the R300 chip? That's kinda of scary to think about.  Especially if your Nvidia.


Maybe you can call me a ATI fanboy, but I don't swear loyalty to just one company.  I like to keep my options open and because of that attitude I have been rewarded in my purchases.   I like what ATI has to offer these days, over and above what Nvidia has to offer.   You keep putting out innovative and good products, I will usually give you shot.   This time around it's ATI's turn.  Who knows what the future will bring, but I'm currently a very happy customer.

I don't want to see Nvidia crumble from the market that's bad for the consumer.  In fact I hope Nvidia rise to the challange to give ATI the good fight.   That's what keeps great products rolling out the door and good prices on top of that.  

I find it kinda of ironic that the first time in two years I will be using a different video card than a Geforce, but when it came time for new motherboard, I ended up going with one powered by a Nvidia nForce2 chipset.  Why?  because right now the nForce2 chipset is the best chipset out for an AthlonXP platform.   Why did I pick an AthlonXP instead of Intel?  I like the price, perfomance, package better than what Intel was offering.  Sure Intel has the 3.06ghz Hyperthreading two-headed monster for their top chip, but I wasn't interested in paying 650 bucks for it.  And anything outside of that chip doesn't impress me enough to get an Intel.  So AMD still has my buissness.

As for the people who currently having problems with ATI cards, I dunno what to say to you, my system runs just fine.

In short, try not basing your opinions off of hersay on various products, or getting into a panic fit because of Joe #859499494 has written the-end-of-the-world problem report on his video card in some games forum.  You don't know how well that guy's (or gal's) system is running.  Probably 95% of problems reported stem from people who's system is far from running perfect, regardless if they swear up and down it is.  Seems most people will concentrate on the small percentage of people having problems, but continually ignore that the majority of people are not having the same problem.  

Also try not to keep your focus on just one line of products.  I think a good chunk of 3DFX owners are sorry that they did.





 



 



 

Primus2003

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #52 on: February 15, 2003, 07:14:35 pm »
In my previous computer I used on SFC 1 I admit with win 98.   WHen I had my ati all in wonder it was a great card.  When i got my most recent computer almost 2 years ago, it was due to the fact I was funded  through a little known bursary however they were picky about  areas where I did not have much choice.  I had to go to IBM, which was well how can I put it I am on my 2nd hard drive, 2nd video card and second power supply since I got this.   In less then 2 years.  Someone else I knew got the identicle one she well lets just leave it at in my opinion I will Never deal with IBM again and I will Never recommend it!  But to the point I got an nvidia card in it, I do not like it or its controls I am back to ATI.  It was and remains all of which in my opinion as well as that of a good number of my trech friends, the better product.  

Dash Jones

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #53 on: February 15, 2003, 11:09:20 pm »
Bit touchy aren't we.  Your suggested method of installing drivers is rather insane and I would tell people right now...not advised by ATI, lest you be uninstalling and reinstalling your OS every week.  In order to get the latests updates in the frequency they come out, saying your staying on top of an XP system...would require that in the order you are stating, not to mention the additional times that are required when they release their own updated drivers.  Nvidia doesn't require or suggest it either for their drivers.  It might get you, as you say a clean running system, but there's hardly anyone who actually does that as much as you are suggesting...if we take you literally on your words.

The problems I listed recently were things I experienced on the ATI cards personally, in addition to having a flock of others having the same problems.  Now much of the problems could be attributed to gamemakers focusing more on Nvidia compatibility than ATI...but who really knows?  There are a lot of game makers.  Anyone who says they've never had problems with their card or chipset though, have either never pushed their computer any, or are suspect.  Sure, I'm certain there are some out there...who are incredibly lucky.

So you know I am not an Isolated event with the Simcity 4 phenomenon (which I have downplayed tremendously from some of the people you meet calling bloody murder over it)...from the exact site you put up...

Quote:



SimCity 4 Patch - 8:43 pm EST - MrB
Maxis has released a patch for SimCity 4. Ver 1.0.242.0

This resolves the following issues:




Fixed crash related to conflict between MySim and Transportation Pack.

Fixed crash related to SIS video chipsets.

Fixed several broken links in advisor messages.

Fixed car zots to display properly.

Fixed bug where the catalog was showing the incorrect capacity for the Recycling Center.

Fixed bug where industry development would occur even when commuters could not reach the zone.

Added support for ATI Radeon R300 series that add backing store capability.

Added option to turn off auto-road when zoning behavior by holding the shift-key while zoning.

Added option to change orientation of lots when zoning by holding the alt-key while zoning.

Added whales.

Retuned pollution values for airports and seaports.

Port efficiency is now displayed correctly.

Airport upgrading now works correctly (based on current use).

Freight trains can now drop cargo at ports.

New zone graphics now better indicate the front of lots.


Sadly only the R300 now has it. That leaves the 9000, 8500, 7500 and the 7000 line to add. I'll find out about that. I tried playing it after the patch and it didn't seem like a big difference. But that could be because I haven't played it in awhile. If you noticed a noticeable improvement with the patch feel free to mail me






As you notice, sadly, it didn't do anything for helping me in my problems.  ATI hasn't done anything in their recent updated drivers either.  I'm not making the things up I'm saying, and I can say, that probably, on your perfect running system, in all likelyhood, you'd run into these bugs as well, or at least some of them...unless you configure your system even better than ATI does theirs, or Maxis.

However, don't take this harshly...I'm a tad touchy.  I admit it could be anything, from WinXP (Which has caused me more gaming grief thus far than anyother OS...that includes WinME and 2000, heck, I've seriously considered converting to Linux...then I wake up and remind myself howmany games are made for Linux (though I do love freeciv).  It could be any number of things.  It could even be I'm better or more lucky with Nvidia products than any other productline (Though even I know they have problems at times...like say certain GeForce 2's and SFC 3 at one point, or the Nvidia problem I mentioned some were having with SimCity 4).

I am glad there are people that will vouch for ATI.  They almost always have better specs on their cards when compared to Nvidia in my eyes...which is probably why there are 4 computers with ATI AIW cards in them in the very room I am sitting in right now.  I just found your suggestion of installing all updates after you install the OS, and then, after that, to get a clean running system, you install the drivers...in that order (which suggests that you need to do a clean install of OS to updates everytime you change the system...aka, get an update) a little odd considering how often updates come out...thus telling people, though it may help tremendously at clearing out problems...that I don't actually think ATI, Nvidia, or any other chipset or card maker would actually suggest most people doing that.  Their idea I think is to create a driver that works with everything already working fine and installed without having to do reinstallations.  At least that's my impression considering the ease with which they made putting the new drivers on your machine (click and they go on and write over the old ones...at least most of the time).

The above article however, is showing test results in certain areas in comparison of the Nvidia FX I believe, and they include a comparison of that against the ATI...which turns up some interesting results.  Seeing that I don't think the site is an Nvidia or ATI site, I expect it would be a little less biased than Nvidia or ATI doing those same tests and reporting the results.

It was a little surprise to me considering all I had heard had pointed out to a Noisy card which you could use as a hairdryer and still wouldn't outperform the ATI in any area was the next little thing coming from Nvidia...and in that light, with the results they showed, has put me up to look a little harder at what the FX will do and look like when it comes out.

Both card companies can be good, however I do find it a little odd that ATI is getting a sticky, almost as if they are...well I won't say it.

At least ATI has good tech support overall.  Never had to call Nvidia to find out about their's yet, so I couldn't tell you about that...but ATI's does get an A+ for tech support if that makes anyone feel any better.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 pm by Dash Jones »

Rod O'neal

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #54 on: February 16, 2003, 12:49:29 am »
Don't believe everything you read in reviews either. I used to be involved with Hi-End audio and had the oppertunity to talk to more than one designer of truely esoteric, hi end equiptment. ALL of them told me that if you wanted a good review from some of the really, really respected reviewers you had to give them the equiptment they were reviewing for extended periods. ie, until they were bored with it, which was usually about 6mos. to a year. For some of these manufacturers that would be upwards of 30 or 40 thousand dollars worth of product. If they couldn't do it then the review would be less than favorable. I'm not saying that this is the case here. Just that not all reviewers are as unbiased as they may want you to believe. Be especially aware of reviews that tell you that the product being reviewed is now in their reference system. Rarely did they buy it. Usually the manufacturer gave it to them for/because of the review.

Mavolic

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #55 on: February 16, 2003, 04:00:20 am »
I can completely uninstall the Catalyst drivers and install the lastest ones without having to reinstall Windows each time.   Still runs perfect.

If there is anything to slam about ATI drivers, is that getting them completely uninstalled can be the problem.  In order to do it right, you need  use your search feature and kill off the rest of the clutter left behind.   RegCleaner comes in real handy to clean up your registery.

But after that,  installing the new drivers goes without a hitch.

People tend to want to treat their computers like a  toaster.  No added maintenence deemed neccessary.   You keep your OS going for a year or two,  trust me, your system is far from perfect.  The only computers I see that can keep going for years without a fresh install of the OS tend to be buissness computers that aren't going through a bunch of different driver updates, OS updates, and having such items like video cards and sound cards being replaced every year.   The reason they can last is because they rarely ever have any changes to them.   Now personal computers, that's a whole different story.  They can go through constant changes to numerous to list here.    But let's just say the Windows isn't exactly at it's best  when it comes  to keeping the clutter from interfering with it.   It's that clutter from left over driver uninstalls, various register clutter from long gone apps,  and basic junk that has been installed on the system.  You would be surprised how much faster and stable your computer is after a fresh install of Windows.

Back to my video card:

I have ran the 9700pro on two completely different systems, and both times it runs just about perfect.

I never stated any of their cards never have any problems, but then again I have had  game troubles with Nvidia cards and their drivers so anyone announcing that Nvidia has no problems just hasn't met the game/chipset/processors combos these quirks come up on.  

I have built a new system recently and have the benifit of reformating my hard drives several  times in the past month.  Not because of anything doing with my video card, just checking out each component and testing them out.  Once I get everything in order, I will throw on Windows and keep it  running for months.  But in that time I have yet had any problems getting the 9700pro stable.  If there was a component that was giving me trouble it was my ASUS motherboard, but nothing a bios upgarde couldn't fix.

I can reformat my hard drive, install the OS, get the neccessary updates, and get most of my important apps installed, and even tweak my system a bit in three hours time.   Three hours really isn't a long time to start from a fresh install of WIndows to fully fuctional system in my book.  Heck,  I've seen people spend more time detailing their cars on a Saturday afternoon.

As for games, I have thrown a few on over the past month to give my system a run through.  The current games and apps I have tried hasn't given my any gamestopping problems with my 9700Pro, but then again I don't mind having to tweak a game to get it to run correctly on my systems,  or search for patches and utilities to get around certain problems.  I know in time that most problems will be fixed by a patch from eiither the game company, or the video card company.  Of course most people don't have the patience I do when it comes to computers.  They want it now, perfect, and will run flawlessly on a infinate number of systems.   Even in the end, regardless of what you use,  nothing put out is 100% perfect.  I know ATI has had problems, and still has some problems with their past video cards.   I understand  that for a time that ATI had problems with thier drivers,  that in some cases have never been resolved.   Well, ATI knows that, understands that, and is actively trying to correct those past problems.  It's damned if you do, and damned if you don't with people.  That's the main reason that the 9700Pro is my first ATI video card.  They always had impressive video cards, but their driver support was sorely lacking.   I do my homework when it comes to buying anything.  That's the great thing about the internet, the world's biggest database of knowledge.  If I listen to nothing but the fanboys or the naysayers, would I truely be doing myself a service when buying a video card?   Probably not.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I don't  treat a computer as a houshold appliance.  Maybe it's because I got into computing when the Apple ][e and the Commandore 64, IBM PC were kings.   Computers and OS's weren't built to be "dumb downed" for the masses.  It took a person to actually learn something to new in order to run them.  Not just hit the power switch and be greeted with a happy GUI.  It really wasn't that long ago that mouses were not standard equipment on a computer, nor did you just double click on an icon.  

Since that time I have built  countless number of computers, had to set up and run numerous pieces of hardware, and have to deal with several different OS's.  There  was no Windows, or USB, or plug and pray around when I first started.   The internet was a pipe dream.  Microsoft was more noted for it's Flight Simulator, than being the juggernaut OS leader they are today.  And believe or not, most of us didn't have a hard drive.  We ran everything out of the RAM.  Hard drives back then were insanely expensive.

It's because of that past that I  still look at computers as an ongoing project.   Something that needs to be tended to, not simply stuck on a desk and forgotten about.  To me they were never designed to be placed into the hands of people who didn't have the willpower to actually learn about what they were using.  Instead,  thanks to Microsoft and Apple,  now people expect them to be like that foremetioned toaster.

I keep hearing people say they don't have the time to do a reformat of their hard drives.  Oh but they have enough time to screw around on game message boards, and also play those games.  But nooo, can't do a reinstall  of WIndows.  Sorry if I don't buy into that.  People are lazy, they don't want to do it, but sorry, sometimes it's neccessary.  

It's really not that hard.  All that stuff you can collect on your hardrive can be transfered off that drive onto a partion, or second hard drive, or in my case, both.  

Personally I'm pretty anal when it comes to backing up my stuff.  If I have something on the C: drive that I really want to keep, it isn't too hard to transfer another copyt to another partion and my second hard drive.  I even go extra mile and burn some stuff onto CD's.  I'm just in the habit of never leaving anything important on the C: drive by itself.  I make copies.  Regardless of how much stuff you accumalate, there is always a way to make a copy of it.  The best way is just to purchase another hard drive.

I keep folders for every little thing I download.  The reason I can get my system up to speed from scratch pretty fast is that I  have darn near everything I need stored on my second hard drive.   Once an OS is installed, it nothing more than point and click.  I even have my serial numbers stored in text document, so I can simply cut and past them into the fields.   Every driver I download is filtered off into it's own folder. That folder has three copies to it.  One on my parition, one on my second hard drive, and one on my CD.
It's almost scary how fast I can get my systems up and running, and do most of it using one hand on the mouse.

Game folders and patches can be saved.  If I have any saved games on my system that I want to keep, I simply save the folder they are stored in.   Most games have patches that you can also store.  I try never to rely on the internet as my sole means of getting my patches installed.  If I can download a full version of the patch, driver, or app, then that's what I do.  Saves bunches of time from not having to dowload it.  Especially if your still on dial-up.


If you never make any  atempt to back up your stuff on your C: drive, your just asking for a heartbreaking experince if you hard drive crashes,  or your get a paticulary nasty virus, or because of an install of something, it crashes your Windows partion.  Then what are you going to do?  Guess you'll have to reinstall Windows at some point.  And then of course you'll have to spend an insane amount of time getting it back to the way you want it.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


So ya, I'm a bit touchy about this.  I can understand people if they have had problems with ATI products in the past, and are hesitant to ever purchase their products again.   I would be too probably, but I wouldn't count them out forever.   The people my posts were aimed at are the ones I never stop seeing.  
You know the ones, the people who have never owned any the metioned products, the ones that love to spread the hersay about products when they clearly never did their homework to find out the factual information.  The ones the go strictly on word of mouth, from other people who are as naive about the products as they are.

And then there are the people who never rise above doing nothing else but turn on the computer, and click the icon.  I have had people proudly boast they know nothing about their computers and are intent on keeping it that way.   "I pay people to install new hard drives or CDRW's"   or " I will never reinstall Windows, when I can get someone else to do it".  I lump these nitwits into the same catagory of people who believe a college education is all the learning they need in life.   Believe me,  I have had people say these things to me.  A good chunk of people these days wants other people to do their thinking for them. That's pretty sad if you ask me.

So yeah, I get cranky when ignorance is passed around like it's the word of a god.  

If you have an actual complaint about something based on good information, or hands on experience, I have no problem with that.

But when people start trying to influence other people by nothing more than word-of-mouth, that annoys me.  I'm sorry, but your friend of a friend of a friend story, shouldn't be used to convince somebody that some product is crap.   Try finding out yourself.  It really isn't that hard to do.

You know something, I have never had to call customer service on anything computer related since hooking up to the internet.   If I have a question about something, a little digging is usually all I need to find out what I need.  I'm not saying there will never be a time I would need to call, but that says something about how great the internet really is.   It's just too bad that there are still some people to lazy to go find the info themselves.  It's one thing to be clearly befuddled about something, but how many problems can be resolved with nothing more than typing the info your looking for into a search engine and clicking the search button?  Think about how much less bad information would be passed along if everyone just look ed up some information about whatever subject they aren't clear on? Like these ATI vs. Nvidia threads.

Nowdays, I do my homework on just about every product I buy.  I don't check just one source, I check a multitude of different reviews, analyst breakdowns, reader submitted reviews.  In short everything I can get my little mouse pointer on.  I don't trust one source of information, I gather many sources and come up with my own conclusions.  Then I will buy the products, give'em a test drive.  If they are not up to par with me, then I return it for something different.    But the last thing I do is try to spread false rumours.  I try and give various companies a chance to prove themselves.   There was a time no one would touch AMD chips.  To slow, to hot, to buggy.  But look how far they have come.  If people still relied on the bogus info that is pass around these days, no one would buy the Athlons.   There are still people who believe that info, like it's  in some holy scripture.    

It's the same thing with video cards.   Is ATI ever going to have a chance to shed their past problems?  or are they forever going to be haunted by their past problems?  Take my advice, the LAST thing you want is for ATI  to bite the dust.  You think video cards are expensive now,  just think  of world now without them.  Your going to have to take out a second mortgage on your house to pay for the current Nvidia offering, and do you think they would have the motivation to keep improving their line of cards?
That's what happen to Intel, until AMD gave them a good slap in the face.  It's taken Intel almost three years to soundly  take back the performance crown from AMD, and in that time we have seen some great prices on processors, and in turn on motherboards and memory.  Not to metion some innovative and remarkable products introduced by both Intel and AMD.  All that wouldn't have happen if AMD didn't break out of their shell, run up the battle flag, and take Intel to the limit.  We would most likely still be running processors under 500mhz, we would have no speedy FSB, or nice fat caches running at full clock speed.  Or various specialized instruction set, and of course no Hyper-Threading on the P4 3.06.

Why bother if you don't have any comptition?

And that's why I write these long-winded posts.  If your smart, you'll want ATI to succeed in a big way.  Same goes for just about any product out there.

But bad info passed along doesn't help that cause.

Hey if your fine running what you have,  than that's what is important.  I have my Geforce3 in my second system.  Good card, though had to suffer through some bad Detenator drivers.   If Geforce is your thing than by all means keep with them.

But try not dragging ATI through the mud if you don't really know anything about them.  And I have seen plenty of those on these boards and others that tell me that there are still plenty of people who haven't got their facts straight on these issuses.   All i'm doing is trying to enlighten the crowd so to speak...




P.S. GEE-ZUS! this a long post.  Damit, you people got me writing a novel...grrrrrr










   

LordStar

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #56 on: February 16, 2003, 11:49:24 am »
I work for a college as the System Specialist

  We have 2000+ machines, all but a handfull are gateways with ati radeons 8500's. Tthey are stable mostly until you actually use them for any heavy graphics use even with fresh from scratch installs, which we do to our specs, as soon as the machines arrive.
  The card is just not stable, well more precise the drivers are not stable and these are supposed oem cards which are suppose to be the most stable of the lot. Now take that same machine, yank the card and install a Nvidia ti4200 with Nvidia's newest non beta drivers and boom you have a machine capable of doing complex rendering with no crashes or hangs. Seems to me this says alot about ati's current state of their drivers. 2000+ computers can't be wrong.  

**DONOTDELETE**

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #57 on: February 16, 2003, 12:35:20 pm »
In this case I'd be just as likely to blame Gateway as ATI.
Have you looked closely at the quality of the mainbooards or
what processors are in use? I have found that
ATI + AMD = poor graphics performance in the long run.

Dell / Gateway + ATI = ack! cough, sputter (cheap, cheap, cheap)

When will the consumer ever learn that saving a few dollars
now will inevitably cost them much more later... sigh...

How many times do I have to say it?
NOTHING compares to the quality of ASUS or Gigabyte mainboards
Intel processors, with Adaptec mass storage and MATROX video cards.

Matrox produces superior video cards that are not built around
the latest games, but rather for quality, stability and performance.

Matrox  

Hawkwind

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #58 on: February 16, 2003, 01:14:15 pm »
Well like I say I and others were just expressing a opinion, and in my case it's also a professional one.

People are free to pick and choose, and quite rightly so.

As for your point of ruling them out perminately, well put it this way if a company holds a bad reputation in one area then obviously people are going to shy away from any future offerings.

(Gives a LONG HARD look at TALDREN..)

Once a brand has a poor reputation is very hard to shake off, if you take SFC3 as a example I doubt I'd buy any further products that had Taldrens logo anywhere near it, after SFC2 and 3, that is unless it's redeemed and the product is put into the state it should have been BEFORE release.

But as far as ATI goes, my own experience is yes they are good cards, but I wouldn't install one into any machine where High reliability was a issue or where a client wasn't prepared or was capable for the up's and downs.

That's one area where I'd give Nvidia Top marks for, purely because they put so much into keeping their drivers current and reliable, far more so than most other manufacturers.  Where their focus has been far too much on pumping out the Highest Spec Hardware.

End of the Day if you've got a car that'll do 250 Mph, it's no damn good if the wheels drop off at 20Mph because of poor wheel nuts. lol

And of all the cards etc I've used and installed and all the software I've tested for various houses, as far as problems go one name consistantly comes up and frequently and for the same reasons.

But at the end of the day, if you have one and you like it good for you, and if you don't and are thinking of buying a new card, well you've heard what I and other Tech Heads have said, and hopefully you'll be able to make a more informed choice of purchase, that's going to suit you best.

Enough said.


Oh and Taldren, please take a huge dose of ethics and clean up your QA!

Releasing something this bad and hoping you can fix it after just isn't a smart way to conduct business, it annoys the hell out of your customer base, and sully's your company's name and reputation.

Or to put it in terms I would use, If it came to building a sytem for a client I wasn't 100% satisfied with, I'd rather not build it at all and keep the client.

I'd rather pay an extra £5 for a quality product than £30 for Junk, and while no software is bug free, someone over there is definately pulling our chain, if they thought this was in anyway shape or form fit to go gold.

Have some pride and never let money be the master of invention.


 

LordStar

  • Guest
Re: In responce to comments made about ATI Technologies and their products
« Reply #59 on: February 16, 2003, 01:34:28 pm »
these are all p4's ranging from 1.8's to 2.4's
all have 256meg of memory
as well as the fact that they only act up with the ati's  
oh and as far as the amd and ati thing I have 2 hand built machines at home both are 1800xp +'s one runs a Geforce and the other runs an ati both are identical exept for the vid card and both run fine even though I notice more slow downs in the ati box then the gf box. but no system halting crashes.  

P.S.  Government contracts are unbreakable however we do spec out the systems we buy and although I don't have the spec sheet here in front of me this minute I am fairly certain that the mobo's are all intel's
« Last Edit: February 16, 2003, 01:41:41 pm by LordStar »