Topic: Thank you for the answer Mister Ferrell (Read 19414 times)

TheSatyr · « **Reply #100 on:** February 12, 2003, 12:44:25 pm »

If what Dave posts disturbs some people then i suggest never going to the battlefront.com(Combat mission) forums.

When the devs there get tired of people they rip them to shreds.

Dave is tame by comparison.

David Ferrell · « **Reply #101 on:** February 12, 2003, 01:34:11 pm »

Quote:

If what Dave posts disturbs some people then i suggest never going to the battlefront.com(Combat mission) forums.

When the devs there get tired of people they rip them to shreds.

Dave is tame by comparison.

However, some of things I have said lately were unnecessary. I do apologize for my harshness at times
and I do intend to get away from it all for awhile and recharge.

Thanks,

Dave

Karnak · « **Reply #102 on:** February 12, 2003, 02:09:34 pm »

In my experience, people/organizations are very rarely anywhere near as bad as they are made out to be because the rhetoric can get so thick on the forums.

I remember Taldren providing the EAW 2.0.3.6 patch at the same time as going gold with SFC3. If the company did not care about SFC2 then they still would have left the D2 community hanging with Crash To Desktop on Targeting bugs with the 2.0.3.3 patch.

As for people arguing with each other on the forums. Some of them become good friends after they fight a good few battles on the dyna cuz they never break the sacred rule of boycotting the other in game play. The ones that do really should consider another leisure hobby, IMHO.

LongTooth · « **Reply #104 on:** February 12, 2003, 03:55:15 pm »

NP dave the last 2 weeks have been heated for a lot of us I think we should all sit back and take a brether

SSCF Hooch · « **Reply #105 on:** February 12, 2003, 05:00:16 pm »

Post deleted by SSCF Hooch

Rob Cole · « **Reply #106 on:** February 12, 2003, 05:26:06 pm »

Better be careful Hoochie...

TheSatyr · « **Reply #107 on:** February 12, 2003, 05:35:45 pm »

What part of "no" don't you understand???

Stormbringer · « **Reply #108 on:** February 12, 2003, 05:40:37 pm »

Your sig kind of clashes with your post.

KATChuutRitt · « **Reply #112 on:** February 12, 2003, 11:38:34 pm »

Dave after your break I would like to invite you over to the SFC2.net forums for a discussion on the bannings. I will ask that everyone there extend their utmost courtesy to you (no promises regarding Die Hard though, and perhaps we can generate a meaningful dialogue that is flame free <crosses fingers>,

There may be things that the pro-unbanning lobby has not taken into consideration which you would like to state, and there are likely other questions that this lobby would like a more detailed and more polite explanation for..

I will respect "your house" here by not trying to ressurrect the unban thread, as per your request. So I hope you find it worthwhile to respect mine. In light of the heat of recent debate on this issue, a change of venue might be more productive and help restore better relations between all involved parties.

P.S. I will stick up for your right to be treated civially there, in appreaciation for such an appearance, and on principle as well. Consider yourself my personal guest if you wish, I will do my best to have you treated well there, regardless of any differences of opinion we may have over this issue.

Just start the thread yourself or send me a PM and I will start one for you. Thanks for your consideration.

Alexander1701 · « **Reply #113 on:** February 13, 2003, 12:03:04 am »

Sorry, perhaps I made myself unclear.

I was refering to the post immediately above mine, the one Dave commented about. There's no shame in saying 'This should be in the patch', but there is shame is sullying that kind of thread by using it to insult taldren, or tell them they've sold out. I probably shouldn't have written all that, but it really did offend me that he would attack a game company because they disagree with his personal oppinion on a non-game related matter. I can't really take it down now, given the level of quotation. As I said, I posted on that petition, but its over, and taldren are not evil for ending it.

Alexander

GE-Raven · « **Reply #117 on:** February 13, 2003, 11:04:56 am »

I am saying that saying that you will stop asking for the unbanning of a member and just let the issue drop if only Taldren just relpies to your mile long tantrum, and then waiting one day before going back on your word to "drop" the issue is rude! So don't play the coy, "I am not the one being rude, you are" routine. In so much as you have been posting on a topic you said you would drop after a response (in a thread to thank Dave no less) you have not been holding to your word.

Now then in response to Chuut. This is your exact words, "Dave after your break I would like to invite you over to the SFC2.net forums for a discussion on the bannings." I ask you this. Is this not bringing up the subject on the forum? Is this not what you promised to not do? Could you not have sent this to Dave in person? What is the point in publicly posting this if not to reraise the issue?

I read very well, thank you. However You and Hooch (and others) seemed to have missed this:

Dave said, "They were never un-banned.

They will not be coming back.

Any further threads of this sort will be deleted as a public nuisance.

Thanks,

Dave "

How much more clear cut do you need? He gave you your answer. Now please do us all a favor and honor your word. No new threads, no hi-jacking of threads, drop the issue. Please?

GE-Raven

News:

Topic: Thank you for the answer Mister Ferrell (Read 19414 times) var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};

TheSatyr

David Ferrell

Karnak

Rob Cole

LongTooth

SSCF Hooch

Rob Cole

TheSatyr

Stormbringer

Toasty0

J'inn

SSCF Hooch

KATChuutRitt

Alexander1701

GE-Raven

SSCF Hooch

KATChuutRitt

GE-Raven

Aldaron

Kroma_BaSyl

Topic: Thank you for the answer Mister Ferrell (Read 19414 times)