Topic: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.  (Read 24506 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline FireSoul

  • Modder of shiplists
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1306
  • mew.
    • http://klingon.lostexiles.net/
OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« on: August 12, 2004, 03:31:27 pm »
Use this thread to post corrections for problems noticed in OP+ 3.4.

I'll start:


Some (useless) ships have disapeared?

  G-APT (Armed Priority Transport) removed.
  G-APX (Armed Priority Transport) removed.
  C-MBG (MB w/ Commando Aug Modules) removed.
  C-MBV (MB w/ Hangar Aug Modules) removed.

Need to reimport them from OP+ 3.3 or something.

-- Luc


Author: OP+ Mod
Maintainer: Coopace
Author: Fests+ for OP
Creator: SFC-OP Mini Updater
Maintainer: SFC-EAW for OP Campaigns
Kitbash: SFC2 models

Offline FireSoul

  • Modder of shiplists
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1306
  • mew.
    • http://klingon.lostexiles.net/
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2004, 09:48:31 pm »
Did some moderator move this thread here?
Why? It has nothing to do with the D2.


Author: OP+ Mod
Maintainer: Coopace
Author: Fests+ for OP
Creator: SFC-OP Mini Updater
Maintainer: SFC-EAW for OP Campaigns
Kitbash: SFC2 models

Offline Dizzy

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6179
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2004, 10:06:07 pm »
Yeah, but I had planned on using those ships on the D2 in 'special missions' Hrmmm. Mb I am a secret admin mb and moved the thread here so I can make a shameless plug for dizzy missions??? Muhahahahaha!

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #3 on: August 17, 2004, 03:03:45 pm »
Not really a Correction, but could you combine the C-Racks on the Z-DWD to one harpoint? 

Oh, and the Casual PFT refits are too cheap  :P
« Last Edit: August 17, 2004, 03:18:56 pm by FPF-DieHard »
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline Hexx

  • Sexy Shoeless Lyran God Of War
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6058
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #4 on: August 17, 2004, 03:35:49 pm »
Not really a Correction, but could you combine the C-Racks on the Z-DWD to one harpoint? 

Oh, and the Casual PFT refits are too cheap  :P

Don't do it FS
I think it's a trick...
Courageously Protesting "Lyran Pelt Day"

Offline FireSoul

  • Modder of shiplists
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1306
  • mew.
    • http://klingon.lostexiles.net/
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #5 on: August 17, 2004, 04:00:25 pm »
Not really a Correction, but could you combine the C-Racks on the Z-DWD to one harpoint? 

Oh, and the Casual PFT refits are too cheap  :P

Don't do it FS
I think it's a trick...

It's not a trick. The casual PFTs *are* cheaper than they should be. However, I don't intend to change how things are done right now since INTs (and PFs) are dumb too. ;)


Author: OP+ Mod
Maintainer: Coopace
Author: Fests+ for OP
Creator: SFC-OP Mini Updater
Maintainer: SFC-EAW for OP Campaigns
Kitbash: SFC2 models

Offline KAT Chuut-Ritt

  • Vice Admiral
  • *
  • Posts: 26161
  • Gender: Male
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #6 on: August 18, 2004, 12:42:54 am »
Yes put the 2 Cracks together in the lowest numbered drone hardpoint like on  the other ships please.

Offline Dizzy

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 6179
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #7 on: August 18, 2004, 06:18:40 am »
Are there any others, chuut?

Offline Age

  • D.Net VIP
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2689
  • Gender: Male
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #8 on: August 27, 2004, 08:21:00 pm »
This what I have in mind for mini installers.This to update the current shiplist and for those wanting just plain combatants ships make an installer.Those that want the combatants as well as the tugs make that an installer.Then is it possible to patch it up with just a new shiplist.This to cut down in the amount of ships in the shiplist and makes it easier for 56kers.I like personable like all the combatants ships in the list but not the tugs.I never see them is the shipyard and don't use them in a skirmish.If you made mini installer or patches that gave them tugs and cgs all separate think how many hints you would have on your site for DLing.

  EG.3.4 Combatants only
       3.4 Combatants with Tugs
       3.4 Combatants with Tug &CGs.
       3.4 Tugs patch
       3.4  CGs patch.
  I know it may seem like a lot of work but think of all the hits that you will have from
  your  site.This a good thing in the modding world.

Offline GDA-S'Cipio

  • Brucimus Maximus
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 5749
  • Gender: Male
  • If I took the bones out, it wouldn't be crunchy.
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #9 on: August 31, 2004, 11:44:09 am »
Yes put the 2 Cracks together in the lowest numbered drone hardpoint like on  the other ships please.

It isn't as important with drones, since they take no power, but I've always been keen to seperate as many weapons as possible.  (Especially photons.)  It gives the captain more options for power and expendature management.

What is your motivation for wanting the racks combined?  Have you noticed a difference in the way the ship takes damage?

-S'Cipio
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on the objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents."  - James Madison (chief author of the Constitution)

-----------------------------------------
Gorn Dragon Alliance member
Gorn Dragon Templar
Coulda' used a little more cowbell
-----------------------------------------


Offline Mog

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 610
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #10 on: August 31, 2004, 12:08:47 pm »
Scip, it's so that they can start a scatterpack, then cancel it, to fill up the C racks from the single firing racks.
Merriment is All

Fear the Meow!

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #11 on: August 31, 2004, 12:28:50 pm »

It isn't as important with drones, since they take no power, but I've always been keen to seperate as many weapons as possible.  (Especially photons.)  It gives the captain more options for power and expendature management.

-S'Cipio

2 Photons per hardpoint is perfect, this is the main reason I prefer the F-DNH to the F-DNHadd.
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline Age

  • D.Net VIP
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2689
  • Gender: Male
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #12 on: August 31, 2004, 01:39:00 pm »
I always compine my racks but only the G racks on Fed. ships.This is so that I can set it to one hot key and I can tell how missles are left.I have it set on 4.

Offline Strat

  • Retired
  • EAW Update Crew
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1368
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #13 on: August 31, 2004, 01:39:19 pm »
I got a NCV on the GW server and noticed I could get INT fighters in it.  I bought some (expensive buggers), but when I launched them in a game, nothing appeared.  

Didn't crash the game or anything, but nothing appeared, and the invisible ships didn't seem to shoot at anything either.  There was also nothing to target.  They showed on the fighter panel as launched, but no ship or anything beyond that appeard.

-Strat

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #14 on: August 31, 2004, 01:41:05 pm »
I got a NCV on the GW server and noticed I could get INT fighters in it.  I bought some (expensive buggers), but when I launched them in a game, nothing appeared.  

Didn't crash the game or anything, but nothing appeared, and the invisible ships didn't seem to shoot at anything either.  There was also nothing to target.  They showed on the fighter panel as launched, but no ship or anything beyond that appeard.

-Strat

This is NOT an OP+ issue.  The INTs are PFs, will only work in GW3, and will only work on the F-NPF PF tender which is actually a Gorn ship. 
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #15 on: September 12, 2004, 07:50:58 pm »
Bump
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline Brezgonne

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 197
  • Gender: Male
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #16 on: September 12, 2004, 08:09:00 pm »
 :-\

Why is the D5XD only listed as 189 BPV when it's correct price is 310?

And why does it still have overloaded phasers when overloads were removed from SFB a long time ago?

And why, if the D5XD is in the shiplist is the Kzinti CMDX not?
----------------




Offline FireSoul

  • Modder of shiplists
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1306
  • mew.
    • http://klingon.lostexiles.net/
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #17 on: September 13, 2004, 10:57:22 am »
:-\

Why is the D5XD only listed as 189 BPV when it's correct price is 310?

I don't actually own the SSD. This data coulda been lost over time.

Quote
And why does it still have overloaded phasers when overloads were removed from SFB a long time ago?
To remain competitive with the Advanced ships. Ideally, that entire portion of the shiplist needs to be fleshed out, but I have no material to do so.

Quote
And why, if the D5XD is in the shiplist is the Kzinti CMDX not?
Because I don't have the CMDX. Oh, thank you for sending it to me. Muahahaha!


Author: OP+ Mod
Maintainer: Coopace
Author: Fests+ for OP
Creator: SFC-OP Mini Updater
Maintainer: SFC-EAW for OP Campaigns
Kitbash: SFC2 models

Offline Age

  • D.Net VIP
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2689
  • Gender: Male
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #18 on: September 13, 2004, 05:49:28 pm »
 FireSoul you didn't answer my question yet it is theyou told me to post in here.It is a few post down Aug.27,04

Offline FireSoul

  • Modder of shiplists
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1306
  • mew.
    • http://klingon.lostexiles.net/
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #19 on: September 13, 2004, 07:15:45 pm »
FireSoul you didn't answer my question yet it is theyou told me to post in here.It is a few post down Aug.27,04

You're right. I didn't.

No, I'm not going to maintain 4 shiplists, or many multiple downloads. That's asking too much of me.


Author: OP+ Mod
Maintainer: Coopace
Author: Fests+ for OP
Creator: SFC-OP Mini Updater
Maintainer: SFC-EAW for OP Campaigns
Kitbash: SFC2 models