Topic: mackies projects  (Read 47802 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline FoaS_XC

  • Photorps, Sammiches, woot woot.
  • Global Moderator
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 4571
  • Gender: Male
    • Robinomicon
Re: rebash: einherjer class v.2 (lwo)
« Reply #20 on: January 21, 2011, 07:55:42 am »
Yeah, I like the new version more :)
Robinomicon
"When I was 5 years old, my mom always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down “happy.” They told me I didn’t understand the assignment and I told them they didn’t understand life."

Offline Klingon Fanatic

  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2069
  • Gender: Male
Re: rebash: einherjer class v.2 (lwo)
« Reply #21 on: January 21, 2011, 07:01:00 pm »
Yeah, I like the new version more :)

I do as well.

I have some concerns about the scale of the parts being used.

Are the Ulysses Warp engines really that huge in comparison to the Challenger class (USS Churchill) secondary hulls?

I absolutely LOVE the idea of using the Excelsior saucer. A+ idea there Mackie.

I had a thought about the Abbe torpedo pod, maybe it could be converted into a through deck hangar to augment the Challenger class hangars?

We need an equally cool Klingon, Romulan or other non-Federation monster ship to balance the coolness scale here too Mackie.

Well done!

KF

Qapla'



HoD Radjekk Vor Thruum
IKV Kraag Dorr
SuvwI' Qeh KCC
Commander, Task Force Kraag Dorr's Teeth First Strike Squadron

Offline Kreeargh

  • Retired.
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1476
  • Gender: Male
  • Life is as is worth only what you learn from it!
Re: rebash: einherjer class v.2 (lwo)
« Reply #22 on: January 21, 2011, 10:14:19 pm »
I like them all  :thumbsup: Tos and  :o JJ version please they will fill all era refits . :)
Time for life!

Offline Starforce2

  • Bridge Commander Ambassador
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2827
    • Nightsoft SFC File Dump
Re: rebash: einherjer class v.2 (lwo)
« Reply #23 on: January 21, 2011, 10:26:31 pm »
I love how bad-ass those rollbars look from the sides. And what you've done with the engines on the excelcior version along with the deflectors.

Are you by chance planning the cour de lion as well?

Offline Mackie

  • Puu jok' unhoittaa juurensa, kaatuu.
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1383
  • Gender: Male
  • The tree that forgets its roots, will fall.
    • stupidfusion
Re: rebash: einherjer class v.2 (lwo)
« Reply #24 on: January 22, 2011, 12:05:56 am »
Yeah, I like the new version more :)

I do as well.

I have some concerns about the scale of the parts being used.

Are the Ulysses Warp engines really that huge in comparison to the Challenger class (USS Churchill) secondary hulls?

I absolutely LOVE the idea of using the Excelsior saucer. A+ idea there Mackie.

I had a thought about the Abbe torpedo pod, maybe it could be converted into a through deck hangar to augment the Challenger class hangars?

We need an equally cool Klingon, Romulan or other non-Federation monster ship to balance the coolness scale here too Mackie.

Well done!

KF

Qapla'
the only things on the ship that arent to scale are the pylons (=somewhat customized), I used the scale of the parts that FOAS had provided :S
And no they arent churchill hulls, theyre a new jersey hulls which are about the same size and shape as those of a constitution class refit, maybe a little wider and longer.
Only those pointy things in the middle of the dishes I used are from the churchill :P
I suppose I could easily whip up a through deck carrier version of the pod, too. which also reminds me, i can do a small carrier ship with just the pod.....  and yall know how much i love flying bridges and  torpedo pods :D

I have the foas klinks available to me when i want em, as soon as i get back home to my place to my  computer i'll start trying to bash something out of em :)
I like them all  :thumbsup: Tos and  :o JJ version please they will fill all era refits . :)
For a TOS version I dont have the rights parts for yet and whats a JJ version?
with a little tinkering i could do one more refit of it in the dominion war style, with phaser strips instead of tits and all  ;D
I love how bad-ass those rollbars look from the sides. And what you've done with the engines on the excelcior version along with the deflectors.

Are you by chance planning the cour de lion as well?
thanks, that kinda was the point :)
Ive tried making the cour de lion a number of times but i never could get it right but i guessi could try again since ive never tried it with these parts and its been a few years since the last attempt!
« Last Edit: January 22, 2011, 12:19:43 am by Mackie »
http://www.stupidfusion.com
________________
"Integrity is doing what is right even when the outcome is already known."

Offline Starfox1701

  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1049
Re: rebash: einherjer class v.2 (lwo)
« Reply #25 on: January 22, 2011, 12:23:54 am »
Quote
JJ version

That would Be from the new AR univeres drom the last movie

Offline Mackie

  • Puu jok' unhoittaa juurensa, kaatuu.
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1383
  • Gender: Male
  • The tree that forgets its roots, will fall.
    • stupidfusion
Re: rebash: einherjer class v.2 (lwo)
« Reply #26 on: January 22, 2011, 12:52:05 am »
Quote
JJ version

That would Be from the new AR univeres drom the last movie

oh ;P while i shouldnt be the one to complain since I produce loads of anything-but-canonical style ships, I really didnt like what they did.
I was kind of okay with the ent series but the movie... well it was a good movie in general, i liked it for the entertaintment value but it was a sh*t movie as far as trek is considered.
I wish that the movies at very least could stick to the already established trek canon since theres plenty of lore yet to be explored but no, instead they seem hellbent on reinventing the whole goddamn franchise.

thank god for great fan made serieses and stories...
http://www.stupidfusion.com
________________
"Integrity is doing what is right even when the outcome is already known."

Offline Bernard Guignard

  • Cad Schematics are our Speciality
  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 887
  • Gender: Male
  • Trek Canon!!! I NO believe in TreK Canon!!!.
Re: new kitbash: Shaker class, in LWO format.
« Reply #27 on: January 22, 2011, 06:59:23 am »
Looking forward to the converted file

Offline Mackie

  • Puu jok' unhoittaa juurensa, kaatuu.
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1383
  • Gender: Male
  • The tree that forgets its roots, will fall.
    • stupidfusion
mackies projects
« Reply #28 on: January 22, 2011, 11:16:28 am »
Okay, this will be my last new thread for another bash. -if ill keep dishing these out in the near future this quick ill just open up a "projects thread"...

As for the ship, this isnt very big or well armed.
Its just a large box with the ability to come and go under its own power that carries a rather large number of shuttles/fighters/landing craft... and commandos.
Supposed to be supported by the rest of the fleet, not intented to carry out missions on its own.
I think you get where im going with this :p
 
credits:
parts from abbe: moonraker, khaliban
parts from new jersey: khaliban
parts from excelsior-b: foas
parts from miranda: wz, zambiezan
parts from akyazi: wz
parts from oberth: p81
retextures: foas

lwo: http://www.stupidfusion.com/files/kitbashes_startrek_lwo/?file=68&sort=1



« Last Edit: January 23, 2011, 03:36:25 pm by FoaS_XC »
http://www.stupidfusion.com
________________
"Integrity is doing what is right even when the outcome is already known."

Offline FoaS_XC

  • Photorps, Sammiches, woot woot.
  • Global Moderator
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 4571
  • Gender: Male
    • Robinomicon
Re: here we go again: Karu class "commando carrier" (lwo)
« Reply #29 on: January 22, 2011, 11:36:00 am »
NOICE!!!
Robinomicon
"When I was 5 years old, my mom always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down “happy.” They told me I didn’t understand the assignment and I told them they didn’t understand life."

Offline Mackie

  • Puu jok' unhoittaa juurensa, kaatuu.
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1383
  • Gender: Male
  • The tree that forgets its roots, will fall.
    • stupidfusion
Re: here we go again: Karu class "commando carrier" (lwo)
« Reply #30 on: January 22, 2011, 12:04:44 pm »
I wasnt exactly sure if there would be any ship type in sfc that would be a match for this ship, i made it with bridge commander in mind and was thinking of making it a mothership type vessel which it could be detachable from :)
btw, karu = "strange but kinda cool" in finnish  ;D
I am well aware knowing that is going to kinda ruin this for someone but i just couldnt think of a better name so...  :D
http://www.stupidfusion.com
________________
"Integrity is doing what is right even when the outcome is already known."

Offline Klingon Fanatic

  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2069
  • Gender: Male
Re: here we go again: Karu class "commando carrier" (lwo)
« Reply #31 on: January 22, 2011, 12:30:27 pm »
Nice work Mackie! Very imaginative use of the Oberth engines too. Thanks for the Finnish language lesson too!

Now that hangar pod should find its way on to the latest Abbe class to make an additional light carrier as well.
HoD Radjekk Vor Thruum
IKV Kraag Dorr
SuvwI' Qeh KCC
Commander, Task Force Kraag Dorr's Teeth First Strike Squadron

Offline FoaS_XC

  • Photorps, Sammiches, woot woot.
  • Global Moderator
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 4571
  • Gender: Male
    • Robinomicon
Re: here we go again: Karu class "commando carrier" (lwo)
« Reply #32 on: January 22, 2011, 12:45:54 pm »
So noted, KF :)
Robinomicon
"When I was 5 years old, my mom always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down “happy.” They told me I didn’t understand the assignment and I told them they didn’t understand life."

Offline Bernard Guignard

  • Cad Schematics are our Speciality
  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 887
  • Gender: Male
  • Trek Canon!!! I NO believe in TreK Canon!!!.
Re: here we go again: Karu class "commando carrier" (lwo)
« Reply #33 on: January 22, 2011, 02:04:22 pm »
I'd suggest putting a shuttle in scale next to her to get an idea as to how many shuttles she would carry
Looks like she could carry quite a few.  ;D
 

Offline Norsehound

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 578
  • Gender: Male
Re: here we go again: Karu class "commando carrier" (lwo)
« Reply #34 on: January 22, 2011, 03:23:16 pm »
Looks like some strange cousin of the Sydney class (Jenolen, et all). Very interesting.

Now if only SFC and the like had such places for these vehicles.

Offline Kreeargh

  • Retired.
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1476
  • Gender: Male
  • Life is as is worth only what you learn from it!
Re: new kitbash: Shaker class, in LWO format.
« Reply #35 on: January 22, 2011, 11:38:08 pm »
Beautifull design  :thumbsup:
Time for life!

Offline FoaS_XC

  • Photorps, Sammiches, woot woot.
  • Global Moderator
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 4571
  • Gender: Male
    • Robinomicon
Re: here we go again: Karu class "commando carrier" (lwo)
« Reply #36 on: January 23, 2011, 01:25:12 am »
ACK! i just realized... reminds me of the Defiant!
Robinomicon
"When I was 5 years old, my mom always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down “happy.” They told me I didn’t understand the assignment and I told them they didn’t understand life."

Offline Mackie

  • Puu jok' unhoittaa juurensa, kaatuu.
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1383
  • Gender: Male
  • The tree that forgets its roots, will fall.
    • stupidfusion
mackies projects
« Reply #37 on: January 23, 2011, 12:51:23 pm »
yeah it looks like these just keep on coming for now  :P

minow class police ship... or monitor? -something like that.

credits:
parts from miranda: wz, zambiezan
parts from star league: khaliban, p81
parts from nitocris: wz
parts from okinawa: wz
retextures: foas

lwo: http://www.stupidfusion.com/files/kitbashes_startrek_lwo/?file=86&sort=1



http://www.stupidfusion.com
________________
"Integrity is doing what is right even when the outcome is already known."

Offline FoaS_XC

  • Photorps, Sammiches, woot woot.
  • Global Moderator
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 4571
  • Gender: Male
    • Robinomicon
Re: mackies projects
« Reply #38 on: January 23, 2011, 01:23:36 pm »
Doesn't feel massive enough to be a monitor (at least, I imagine them massive). Would definitely work great as a Police ship, though :)
Robinomicon
"When I was 5 years old, my mom always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down “happy.” They told me I didn’t understand the assignment and I told them they didn’t understand life."

Offline Mackie

  • Puu jok' unhoittaa juurensa, kaatuu.
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1383
  • Gender: Male
  • The tree that forgets its roots, will fall.
    • stupidfusion
Re: mackies projects
« Reply #39 on: January 23, 2011, 01:41:18 pm »
Doesn't feel massive enough to be a monitor (at least, I imagine them massive). Would definitely work great as a Police ship, though :)
yeah well I dont know how these things work out, as in class types  ;D
I suppose that police ship it is since its for patrolling already held systems, dealing with minor issues.
http://www.stupidfusion.com
________________
"Integrity is doing what is right even when the outcome is already known."