Topic: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.  (Read 24914 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline FireSoul

  • Modder of shiplists
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1306
  • mew.
    • http://klingon.lostexiles.net/
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #60 on: October 15, 2004, 09:18:29 pm »
So?  The Ubber-powercurves make them "X."

Oveloading phasers was pulled in SFB years ago and ALL the other SFB X-weapons don't exist either.

hhhhmmmmm, open-source  ;D

It's still much easier for me to ask for your patience, and wait to see what happens with the sourcecode..


Author: OP+ Mod
Maintainer: Coopace
Author: Fests+ for OP
Creator: SFC-OP Mini Updater
Maintainer: SFC-EAW for OP Campaigns
Kitbash: SFC2 models

Offline Kroma BaSyl

  • Romulan Tart
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2276
  • Don't hate me because I'm beautiful.
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #61 on: October 19, 2004, 11:57:14 am »
So?  The Ubber-powercurves make them "X."

Oveloading phasers was pulled in SFB years ago and ALL the other SFB X-weapons don't exist either.

hhhhmmmmm, open-source  ;D

It's still much easier for me to ask for your patience, and wait to see what happens with the sourcecode..

No doubt, as I said it was just wishful thinking ;-)
♥ ♥ ♥  GDA Kroma BaSyl  ♥ ♥ ♥
GCS Prima Ballerina
GCS PHAT Gorn
GCS Queen Kroma


Because this game makes me feel like  a thirteen year old girl trapped in a lizards body.

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #62 on: October 19, 2004, 06:20:56 pm »
Back to the nit picking  ;D

The F-DW looks good at 4.30 IMHO



Model.siz entries should be:

OPPLUS\MODELS\FDW\FDW.MOD   4.30
OPPLUS\MODELS\FDW\FDW_BRK.MOD   4.30
OPPLUS\MODELS\FDWD\FDWD.MOD   4.30
OPPLUS\MODELS\FDWD\FDWD_BRK.MOD   4.30
OPPLUS\MODELS\FDWS\FDWS.MOD   4.25
OPPLUS\MODELS\FDWS\FDWS_BRK.MOD   4.25
OPPLUS\MODELS\FDWV\FDWV.MOD   4.30
OPPLUS\MODELS\FDWV\FDWV_BRK.MOD   4.30
OPPLUS\MODELS\FHDW\FHDW.MOD   4.70
OPPLUS\MODELS\FHDW\FHDW_BRK.MOD   4.70


Next nit to pick , the F-NCL/F-NCA is too small.   Isn't the saucer supposed to be the same size as the one on a Connie?  Right now, the NCA is SMALLER than the DW even with me shrinking it by 1.



Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline Strafer

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 428
  • Gender: Male
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #63 on: October 19, 2004, 08:14:14 pm »
If you wanna compare sizes, use the DW. That engine on the bottom is identical to the DW/HDW multi-engines... That should scale things.
--
Code: [Select]
Lineage II
Server                           Sieghardt                    deviantrealms.com (dead)
Chars       Strafer          L24 Rogue                  L64 Hawkeye
                StrayFar       L64 Tyrant                  L51 Tyrant
                StrawFur      L37 Scavenger            L49 Bounty Hunter
                StraightFour L62 Shillen Elder         L53 Shillen Elder

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #64 on: October 19, 2004, 09:00:52 pm »
If you wanna compare sizes, use the DW. That engine on the bottom is identical to the DW/HDW multi-engines... That should scale things.

Actually, if the F-DW and F-NCA sizes from OP+ 3.4 were flipped, they would look about right.
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #65 on: October 20, 2004, 10:26:37 pm »
Here is what the NCL looks like with an increase in it's size so the Saucer is the same size os the Saucer of a CA.   Below are the Model.siz entries used:


OPPLUS\MODELS\FNCL\FNCL.MOD     7.43
OPPLUS\MODELS\FNCL\FNCL_BRK.MOD   7.43

Warp engines look a little big for 12 pointers, but the saucer is the correct size.

Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline FireSoul

  • Modder of shiplists
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1306
  • mew.
    • http://klingon.lostexiles.net/
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #66 on: October 20, 2004, 11:18:47 pm »
The NCL's saucer is NOT supposed to be as big as a CA's. Sorry DH.
It's the DD's saucer. Could you have mixed the two up?


Author: OP+ Mod
Maintainer: Coopace
Author: Fests+ for OP
Creator: SFC-OP Mini Updater
Maintainer: SFC-EAW for OP Campaigns
Kitbash: SFC2 models

Offline Age

  • D.Net VIP
  • Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 2689
  • Gender: Male
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #67 on: October 20, 2004, 11:26:22 pm »
   It looks ok considering the NCL may have to go on long missions.More NPCs 

    Nice pics though

Offline FireSoul

  • Modder of shiplists
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1306
  • mew.
    • http://klingon.lostexiles.net/
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #68 on: October 20, 2004, 11:48:12 pm »
   It looks ok considering the NCL may have to go on long missions.More NPCs 

    Nice pics though

The NCL is just a War Cruiser. It's a CL with less hull in the saucer. I hate to break it to you, but 'long missions' is not what it was designed for either.


Author: OP+ Mod
Maintainer: Coopace
Author: Fests+ for OP
Creator: SFC-OP Mini Updater
Maintainer: SFC-EAW for OP Campaigns
Kitbash: SFC2 models

Offline KHH Jakle

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 602
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #69 on: October 21, 2004, 09:28:17 am »
The NCL's saucer is NOT supposed to be as big as a CA's. Sorry DH.
It's the DD's saucer. Could you have mixed the two up?

But the Old DD saucer is precisely the same as the Old CA saucer.  That was the failing of the original DD design: It had all the saucer armament of the CA, but only half the power.  Of course the internal arrangement is a little different (in terms of labs, hull, ect) but I believe if you add up all the internals of the DD hull (and hence the NCL hull) on the original SSD, they will be the same.

Jumping on DH's nit pick bandwagon....

Offline FireSoul

  • Modder of shiplists
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1306
  • mew.
    • http://klingon.lostexiles.net/
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #70 on: October 21, 2004, 09:59:26 am »
The NCL's smaller. It has 10 hull boxes while the CA's got 12.
Also, if you look at the NCL/NCA models from a profile, they're thicker. The saucer's radius does not have to be the same.


Author: OP+ Mod
Maintainer: Coopace
Author: Fests+ for OP
Creator: SFC-OP Mini Updater
Maintainer: SFC-EAW for OP Campaigns
Kitbash: SFC2 models

Offline KHH Jakle

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 602
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #71 on: October 21, 2004, 11:42:49 am »
what about the DD? (holds club over rotting horse...)

Offline KBFKrotz

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #72 on: October 21, 2004, 02:38:02 pm »

Lyran:
  Mech Links: Y178
  PowerPack: Y177





 :o Module C1 lists Lyran P-refits as being Y168...that's a scary proposition, CWLs w/30 power and BCs w/38 power until Y177, even the Kzin would have more juice<shudder>

Any thoughts to adding R-BHB, HFA, and SNC from ADB's Starfleet Times "Advanced Romulan Eagle-Class Designs of the General War"http://www.starfleetgames.com/sfb/sft/sft34.htm to next OP+ shiplist release?

Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #73 on: October 21, 2004, 05:27:00 pm »
The NCL's smaller. It has 10 hull boxes while the CA's got 12.
Also, if you look at the NCL/NCA models from a profile, they're thicker. The saucer's radius does not have to be the same.

Smaller yeah, but not as small as they appear in OP+ 3.4  ;D

Did I at least get the DW perspective correct?
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline FireSoul

  • Modder of shiplists
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1306
  • mew.
    • http://klingon.lostexiles.net/
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #74 on: October 25, 2004, 09:03:17 am »
I think you did. I have plugged in some values into the model.siz file that looks ok to me, but that's part of the next release of course.
... when that'll be, who knows. I'm not even 1/2 (maybe 1/3?) through R9 yet because of all the unique and conjectural ship models I have to make. On top of that I have not done any work on the refit dates yet..
But that's okay.. It's gonna be a kickass release.


Author: OP+ Mod
Maintainer: Coopace
Author: Fests+ for OP
Creator: SFC-OP Mini Updater
Maintainer: SFC-EAW for OP Campaigns
Kitbash: SFC2 models

Offline zerosnark

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 104
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #75 on: November 01, 2004, 12:17:59 pm »
The Fed DD, SC, Tug and CA were supposed to have almost identical saucer dimensions. As others have said, only the internal arrangements vary slightly.

Which is bizarre, but this is not the place to discuss.

The NCL, being developed from a DD+ and having the same basic weapons and internal arrangement, would logically have the same sized saucer (ignoring the fact that the shuttle bay is bigger).

As for the hull boxes: I think Hull boxes are more a function structural strength rather than physical size. The DD has less boxes because the the ship is less robust. Goes along with the hideous breakdown rating.


Offline FPF-DieHard

  • DDO Junkie
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 9461
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #76 on: November 03, 2004, 01:13:11 am »
K-D7L should come out before 2275.  Captains Log 26, page 37.   (Sl218.0) "For the Honor of the Flag"

Scenario is in 2271, Klingon forces are lead by a D7L.

Well, this is good enough for me for moving it up on GW4  ;D
Who'd thunk that Star-castling was the root of all evil . . .


Offline Tumulorum Fossor

  • Lt. Junior Grade
  • *
  • Posts: 147
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #77 on: November 08, 2004, 09:14:21 pm »
FireSoul, I apologize if this is not a OP+ issue or you were already aware.

At the "Ship Library" on the Race Selection screen of SFCOP, when one can cycle through ship schematics, the background ship images are missing for several Fed ships (I believe they were freighters).  Sorry: should have written them down.  The icons representing the weapons are there, just the simple line artistic images of the ship hulls are missing.

-TF

Offline FireSoul

  • Modder of shiplists
  • Lt. Commander
  • *
  • Posts: 1306
  • mew.
    • http://klingon.lostexiles.net/
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #78 on: November 09, 2004, 09:39:47 am »
FireSoul, I apologize if this is not a OP+ issue or you were already aware.

At the "Ship Library" on the Race Selection screen of SFCOP, when one can cycle through ship schematics, the background ship images are missing for several Fed ships (I believe they were freighters).  Sorry: should have written them down.  The icons representing the weapons are there, just the simple line artistic images of the ship hulls are missing.

-TF

I used an orion UI for these freighters, hence the problem. I considered it minor since it works during a scenario..


Author: OP+ Mod
Maintainer: Coopace
Author: Fests+ for OP
Creator: SFC-OP Mini Updater
Maintainer: SFC-EAW for OP Campaigns
Kitbash: SFC2 models

Offline CaptJosh

  • Lt.
  • *
  • Posts: 775
  • Gender: Male
Re: OP+ 3.4 Corrections Thread.
« Reply #79 on: November 16, 2004, 07:28:25 pm »
I would note that the line art often no longer matches the actual ship silhouettes with the new models and shiplist. Is there any way to correct this? I'd do some new line art, but I suck at drawing.
CaptJosh

There are only 10 kinds of people in the world;
those who understand binary and those who don't.